Design Thinking and Ethical Frameworks for Artificial Intelligence: A Look at Multi-Stakeholder Engagement

被引:0
|
作者
Rojas, Maria Lorena Florez [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
来源
DESAFIOS | 2023年 / 35卷 / 01期
关键词
Artificial Intelligence strategy; multi-stakeholder; design thinking; Colombia; Canada;
D O I
10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/desafios/a.12183
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Stakeholder engagement should respect the principles that guarantee effectiveness and be timely, inclusive, transparent and iterative. However, the creation and implementation of regula- tory frameworks on innovative topics is sometimes biased by a dominant party in the discussion. This article demonstrates how the design thinking approach, mainly in its co-creation phase, is potentially conducive to the creation and implementation of so-called Artificial Intelligence (Ai) strategies, due to its emphasis on respect for human dignity and other fundamental attributes such as empathy, although it has several challenges for its implementation. This approach is based on a deductive methodology through the process of creation and socialization of Ai strategies that were developed in Canada and Colombia. This article seeks to incentivize technological and regulatory innovation through design thinking so it can be considered an integral part of the actual convening of multiple stakeholders in order to facilitate the creation of a proactive digital ethics program that prevents existing concerns related to large-scale Ai adoption.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 31
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A multi-stakeholder engagement framework for knowledge management in ICT4D
    Thomas, Manoj A.
    Li, Yan
    Sistenich, Vera
    Diango, Ken Ngoy
    Kabongo, Diulu
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 74 (12) : 1384 - 1400
  • [32] Identifying barriers to Implementation of New Care Models, a Multi-Stakeholder Engagement Study
    Carroll, Aine
    Twomey, Valerie
    White, Barry
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2018, 18
  • [33] Building Trust in Multi-stakeholder Partnerships: Critical Emotional Incidents and Practices of Engagement
    Sloan, Pamela
    Oliver, David
    ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2013, 34 (12) : 1835 - 1868
  • [34] NEW THINKING ON TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS TOWARDS A MULTI-STAKEHOLDER APPROACH
    Tamo, Atabongawung
    NETHERLANDS QUARTERLY OF HUMAN RIGHTS, 2016, 34 (02) : 147 - 173
  • [35] Designing Regulatory Frameworks for Access to Genetic Resources: A Multi-Stakeholder Multi-Criteria Approach
    Sirakaya, Aysegul
    De Brucker, Klaas
    Vanagt, Thomas
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2020, 11
  • [36] Developing mHealth Apps with Researchers: Multi-Stakeholder Design Considerations
    Craven, Michael P.
    Lang, Alexandra R.
    Martin, Jennifer L.
    DESIGN, USER EXPERIENCE, AND USABILITY: USER EXPERIENCE DESIGN FOR EVERYDAY LIFE APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES, PT III, 2014, 8519 : 15 - 24
  • [37] Mapping UK frameworks for ethical artificial intelligence applied to dermatology
    Shah, Syed Fazal Hussein
    Matin, Rubeta N.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2023, 188
  • [38] Value modelling for multi-stakeholder and multi-objective optimisation in engineering design
    Papageorgiou, Evangelos
    Eres, Murat Hakki
    Scanlan, James
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2016, 27 (10) : 697 - 724
  • [39] The role of sustainability knowledge-action platforms in advancing multi-stakeholder engagement on sustainability
    Mcintosh, Oliver Bream
    Burnett, Amy
    Feldman, Ira
    Lamphere, Jenna A.
    Reuter, Thomas A.
    Vital, Emmanuelle
    DATA & POLICY, 2023, 5
  • [40] Multi-Stakeholder Innovation in Smart City Discourse: Quadruple Helix Thinking in the Age of "Platforms"
    Borghys, Koen
    van der Graaf, Shenja
    Walravens, Nils
    Van Compernolle, Mathias
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE CITIES, 2020, 2