Design Thinking and Ethical Frameworks for Artificial Intelligence: A Look at Multi-Stakeholder Engagement

被引:0
|
作者
Rojas, Maria Lorena Florez [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
来源
DESAFIOS | 2023年 / 35卷 / 01期
关键词
Artificial Intelligence strategy; multi-stakeholder; design thinking; Colombia; Canada;
D O I
10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/desafios/a.12183
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Stakeholder engagement should respect the principles that guarantee effectiveness and be timely, inclusive, transparent and iterative. However, the creation and implementation of regula- tory frameworks on innovative topics is sometimes biased by a dominant party in the discussion. This article demonstrates how the design thinking approach, mainly in its co-creation phase, is potentially conducive to the creation and implementation of so-called Artificial Intelligence (Ai) strategies, due to its emphasis on respect for human dignity and other fundamental attributes such as empathy, although it has several challenges for its implementation. This approach is based on a deductive methodology through the process of creation and socialization of Ai strategies that were developed in Canada and Colombia. This article seeks to incentivize technological and regulatory innovation through design thinking so it can be considered an integral part of the actual convening of multiple stakeholders in order to facilitate the creation of a proactive digital ethics program that prevents existing concerns related to large-scale Ai adoption.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 31
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-stakeholder engagement
    Blenkus, M. Gabrijelcic
    Kronegger, L.
    Pushkarev, N.
    Robnik, M.
    Sotlar, I.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 30
  • [2] Ethical and legal considerations influencing human involvement in the implementation of artificial intelligence in a clinical pathway: A multi-stakeholder perspective
    Hill, Elizabeth Redrup
    Mitchell, Colin
    Brigden, Tanya
    Hall, Alison
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN DIGITAL HEALTH, 2023, 5
  • [3] Ethical aspects of multi-stakeholder recommendation systems
    Milano, Silvia
    Taddeo, Mariarosaria
    Floridi, Luciano
    [J]. INFORMATION SOCIETY, 2021, 37 (01): : 35 - 45
  • [4] Multi-stakeholder engagement in health services research
    Ladeji, E. Olayinka
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2018, 7 (06) : 517 - 521
  • [5] Multi-stakeholder engagement for sustainable bridge delivery
    Zhang, Chao
    Canning, Lee
    Dubois, Leonie
    Vipham, Marc
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENGINEERING SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, 164 (03) : 197 - 211
  • [6] Fundamental Principles of Managing Multi-stakeholder Engagement
    Peterson, H. Christopher
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FOOD AND AGRIBUSINESS MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2013, 16 (0A): : 11 - 21
  • [7] Marketing's role in multi-stakeholder engagement
    Aksoy, Lerzan
    Banda, Sandhya
    Harmeling, Colleen
    Keiningham, Timothy L.
    Pansari, Anita
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING, 2022, 39 (02) : 445 - 461
  • [8] Multi-stakeholder preferences for the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A systematic review and thematic analysis
    Vo, Vinh
    Chen, Gang
    Aquino, Yves St James
    Carter, Stacy M.
    Do, Quynh Nga
    Woode, Maame Esi
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2023, 338
  • [9] Artificial Intelligence and Ethical Frameworks in Pediatrics
    Liu, Kai
    [J]. JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2024, 178 (06) : 626 - 627
  • [10] Letters to stakeholders: An emerging phenomenon of multi-stakeholder engagement
    Civera, Chiara
    Cortese, Damiano
    Dmytriyev, Sergiy
    Freeman, R. Edward
    [J]. BUSINESS ETHICS THE ENVIRONMENT & RESPONSIBILITY, 2023,