The effects of scaling strategies on the scaling of social impact: Evidence from Chinese social enterprises

被引:4
|
作者
Bi, Xiang-Yang [1 ]
Yu, Xiao-Min [2 ]
机构
[1] Minzu Univ China, Sch Ethnol & Sociol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Social Dev & Publ Policy, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT & LEADERSHIP | 2023年 / 33卷 / 03期
关键词
China; nonprofit organizations; scaling; social enterprises; social impact; CIVIL-SOCIETY; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; PERFORMANCE; SUSTAINABILITY; ORGANIZATIONS; PERCEPTIONS; FRAMEWORK; MODELS; SECTOR;
D O I
10.1002/nml.21531
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Conventional nonprofit organizations (NPOs) and social enterprises (SEs) face constant challenges when scaling their social impacts, especially in societies undergoing transformation, such as China, where NPO and SE ecosystems are still nascent. Whereas previous studies have identified various scaling approaches for SEs, empirical investigations of the linkages between scaling strategies and scaling performance are lacking. To address this gap, we conducted a quantitative study of 293 Chinese SEs to examine how the four types of scaling strategies brought about different scaling performances and how the results varied upon organizational form. Our results revealed that three of these scaling strategies, namely knowledge dissemination, organizational growth, and contractual partnerships, contributed positively and significantly to scaling performance, whereas capacity building had a positive but not statistically significant effect. Our results also indicated that the positive contributions of organizational growth and knowledge dissemination to scaling performance were reinforced in SEs organized as nonprofits. Moreover, the results indicated that SEs that deployed combined and diversified scaling strategies demonstrated better scaling performance than those that deployed just one strategy. Our findings have important managerial implications for practitioners within the SE community, and especially providing a scientific basis for the managers of nonprofit SEs to select appropriate scaling strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 560
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Scaling Up Social Problems: Strategies for Solving Social Work's Grand Challenges
    Rodriguez, Maria Y.
    Ostrow, Laysha
    Kemp, Susan P.
    RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2017, 27 (02) : 139 - 149
  • [32] Implicit Social Scaling from an Institutional Perspective
    Giulio D’Epifanio
    Social Indicators Research, 2009, 94 : 203 - 212
  • [33] Implicit Social Scaling from an Institutional Perspective
    D'Epifanio, Giulio
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2009, 94 (02) : 203 - 212
  • [34] Perceived impacts of social enterprises in scaling effective refractive error coverage in Kenya
    Muma, Shadrack Lusi
    Naidoo, Kovin Shunmugam
    Hansraj, Rekha
    SOCIAL ENTERPRISE JOURNAL, 2024, 20 (01) : 91 - 110
  • [35] Enabling Effective Social Impact: Towards a Model for Impact Scaling Agreements
    Aschari-Lincoln, Jessica
    Jacobs, Claus D.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (12)
  • [36] Social Auto-Scaling
    Smith, Peter
    Gonzalez-Velez, Horacio
    Caton, Simon
    2018 26TH EUROMICRO INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PARALLEL, DISTRIBUTED, AND NETWORK-BASED PROCESSING (PDP 2018), 2018, : 186 - 195
  • [37] Scaling issues in the social sciences
    Evans, TP
    Ostrom, E
    Gibson, C
    SCALING IN INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT, 2003, : 75 - 106
  • [38] Quantitative Scaling of Social Innovations
    Omonov, Zhoomart K.
    Veretennikova, Anna Yu.
    MONTENEGRIN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2016, 12 (04) : 77 - 86
  • [39] The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Implementation on Enterprises' Financial Performance-Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies
    Li, Xudong
    Esfahbodi, Ali
    Zhang, Yufeng
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (05)
  • [40] Knowledge base for social capital's role in scaling social impact: A bibliometric analysis
    Mohiuddin, Md. Fazla
    Yasin, Ida Md.
    Latiff, Ahmed R. A.
    BUSINESS ETHICS THE ENVIRONMENT & RESPONSIBILITY, 2023, 32 (02): : 742 - 772