Economic sustainability of energy conservation policy: improved panel data evidence

被引:4
|
作者
Petrovic, Predrag [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Social Sci, Kraljice Natalije Str 45, Belgrade, Serbia
关键词
Energy consumption; Real per capita GDP; Energy conservation policy; Non-stationarity; Cointegration; Granger non-causality; CROSS-SECTIONAL DEPENDENCE; LAGRANGE MULTIPLIER TEST; GROWTH NEXUS EVIDENCE; CO2; EMISSIONS; ERROR-CORRECTION; CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP; AMERICA EVIDENCE; UNIT ROOTS; CONSUMPTION; COUNTRIES;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-021-02104-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper examines the nature of the economic activity-energy use nexus for 82 countries and the period from 1971 to 2014. Compared to all other papers, the current study is based on a significantly larger number of observations and was carried out by using new and advanced non-stationary panel data econometric techniques that overcame most of the existing methodical failures. The findings of the Granger non-causality test quite robustly lead to the conclusion that there is bi-directional causality both in the short and the long run. Finally, the obtained estimation results suggest that the increase of energy consumption by 1% results in an increase of GDP per capita between 0.54 and 0.56%. Also, the increase of GDP by 1% results in an increase in energy consumption between 0.47 and 0.48%. Governments cannot simply apply energy conservation policy by reducing total consumption of fossil fuels without negatively affecting economic activity and generating of spiral of mutual effects with positive ecological and very negative economic consequences. It is therefore necessary to make significant efforts to modernize the energy sector and to stimulate companies to invest in new energy-efficient production technologies relying on alternative environmentally friendly energy sources.
引用
收藏
页码:1473 / 1491
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The institutions of economic freedom and entrepreneurship:: evidence from panel data
    Nystrom, Kristina
    PUBLIC CHOICE, 2008, 136 (3-4) : 269 - 282
  • [32] THE INTRODUCTION OF THE EURO AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: SOME PANEL DATA EVIDENCE
    Conti, Maurizio
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2014, 17 (02) : 199 - 211
  • [33] Does renewable energy affect economic growth? Evidence from panel data estimation of BRIC countries
    Venkatraja, B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2020, 27 (02): : 107 - 113
  • [34] Impact of Energy Conservation and Emissions Reduction Policy Means Coordination on Economic Growth: Quantitative Evidence from China
    Zhang, Guoxing
    Zhang, Zhenhua
    Gao, Xiulin
    Yu, Lean
    Wang, Shouyang
    Wang, Yingluo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (05)
  • [35] Motivation crowding by economic incentives in conservation policy: A review of the empirical evidence
    Rode, Julian
    Gomez-Baggethun, Erik
    Krause, Torsten
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 117 : 270 - 282
  • [36] The actual heating energy conservation in China: Evidence and policy implications
    Lin, Jing
    Lin, Boqiang
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2019, 190 : 195 - 201
  • [37] Conservation, evidence and policy
    Adams, William M.
    Sandbrook, Chris
    ORYX, 2013, 47 (03) : 329 - 335
  • [38] The sustainability of fiscal policy: evidence from a panel of six South-Mediterranean countries
    Ehrhart, Christophe
    Llorca, Matthieu
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2008, 15 (10) : 797 - 803
  • [39] Strategies for energy conservation and sustainability
    Jovicic, S.
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2024, 558
  • [40] Strategies for Improving the Sustainability of Data Centers via Energy Mix, Energy Conservation, and Circular Energy
    Manganelli, Matteo
    Soldati, Alessandro
    Martirano, Luigi
    Ramakrishna, Seeram
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (11)