A graftless maxillary sinus lifting approach with simultaneous dental implant placement: a prospective clinical study

被引:1
|
作者
Albadani, Mohammed M. [1 ]
Elayah, Sadam Ahmed [1 ]
Al-Wesabi, Mohammed Ali [2 ]
Al-Aroomi, Omar A. [1 ]
Al Qadasy, Nadia E. [3 ]
Saleh, Hussein [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiblah Univ Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Ibb, Yemen
[2] Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Dent, Aden, Yemen
[3] Ibn Al Nafis Univ Med Sci, Fac Dent, Sanaa, Yemen
关键词
Dental implants; Residual alveolar bone; Maxillary sinus lifting; Simultaneous implantation; Sinus floor elevation; Graftless minimally invasive surgery; FLOOR ELEVATION; MEMBRANE ELEVATION; CRESTAL APPROACH; BONE-FORMATION; AUGMENTATION; MULTICENTER; MORBIDITY; STABILITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-024-03949-9
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose This study aimed to introduce a graftless sinus lifting approach with simultaneous dental implant placement in the alveolus of the posterior maxilla and compare this approach's outcomes in freshly extracted sockets versus healed sockets. Materials and methods A prospective study was conducted on 60 patients aged between 27 and 59 years old, requiring dental implants in the posterior maxilla, and diagnosed with reduced vertical bone height (30 with freshly extracted sockets (group A) and the remaining 30 with healed sockets (group B). Before the sinus lifting approach, a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was taken, followed by another CBCT at least one-year post-sinus lifting (range: 12-36 months). Biological and mechanical complications were assessed, and the primary implant stability was measured using the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ). Parametric data were analyzed using an independent t-test for intergroup comparisons, with significance set at P < 0.05. Results No significant differences were found among groups concerning gender, placement side, and follow-up. All dental implants demonstrated high survival rates with no observed biological or mechanical complications. Moreover, the primary implant stability was satisfactory, and there was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.38). In terms of new intrasinus bone formation, both groups exhibited satisfactory and successful outcomes, with increased new bone formation in group A. However, there was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.26). Regarding the vertical sinus floor elevation without new bone formation, group B showed (0.11 +/- 0.64) mm of intrasinus implant height without bone formation, while group A showed an increment of bone formation above the intrasinus implant (0.22 +/- 0.33) mm, with no statistically significant difference between both groups (P = 0.30). Conclusion Our approach proves to be predictable, low-cost, and efficient option for sinus lift procedures, demonstrating high survival rates with acceptable primary implant stability. Moreover, it yields satisfactory outcomes in terms of new intrasinus bone formation, both in freshly extracted and healed sockets. Consequently, our approach holds promise as a reliable procedure for sinus lifting with simultaneous dental implant placement.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dental Implant Migration in Grafted Maxillary Sinus
    Galindo-Moreno, Pablo
    Padial-Molina, Miguel
    Sanchez-Fernandez, Elena
    Hernandez-Cortes, Pedro
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    O'Valle, Francisco
    [J]. IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2011, 20 (06) : 400 - 405
  • [32] Late displacement of a dental implant into maxillary sinus
    Tavares, Rodrigo Nunes
    Nogueira, Alexandre Simoes
    da Silva Sampieri, Marcelo Bonifacio
    Bezerra, Marcelo Ferraro
    Goncales, Eduardo Sanches
    [J]. BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2014, 80 (04) : 359 - 361
  • [33] TOPICAL ALENDRONATE ENHANCE THE HEALING OF MAXILLARY SINUS LIFTING FOR DENTAL IMPLANTATION IN OSTEOPOROTIC WOMEN: CLINICAL STUDY
    Adarnli, S.
    Bassit, G.
    Koshaji, N.
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 27 : S128 - S128
  • [34] Maxillary sinus osteitis secondary to a dental implant
    Mirante, Joseph P.
    Christmas, Dewey A.
    Yanagisawa, Eiji
    [J]. ENT-EAR NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL, 2008, 87 (12) : 670 - 671
  • [35] TOPICAL ALENDRONATE ENHANCE THE HEALING OF MAXILLARY SINUS LIFTING FOR DENTAL IMPLANTATION IN OSTEOPOPROTIC WOMEN: CLINICAL STUDY
    Adarnli, S.
    Bassit, G.
    Kochaji, N.
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 26 : S432 - S433
  • [36] Modified maxillary sinus floor elevation via a mini-lateral window with simultaneous placement of dental implants: a clinical and radiographical study
    Zhu, Liqin
    He, Liangru
    Wang, Qun
    Chen, Xiaoyi
    Xu, Junhua
    Wang, Huiming
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 10 (06): : 9314 - 9321
  • [37] Onlay Bone Augmentation and Bilateral Open Sinus Lifting With Simultaneous Implant Placement in a Cherubic Patient
    Khojasteh, Arash
    Sadr, Seyed Jalil
    Saboury, Aboulfazl
    Shidfar, Shireen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 25 (02) : E193 - E196
  • [38] Localized management of sinus floor with simultaneous implant placement: A clinical report
    Bruschi, GB
    Scipioni, A
    Calesini, G
    Bruschi, E
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 1998, 13 (02) : 219 - 226
  • [39] Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation Using Bovine Bone Grafts With Simultaneous Implant Placement: A 5-Year Prospective Follow-Up Study
    Ozkan, Yasar
    Akoglu, Burcin
    Kulak-Ozkan, Yasemin
    [J]. IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2011, 20 (06) : 455 - 459
  • [40] Rabbit maxillary sinus augmentation model with simultaneous implant placement: differential responses to the graft materials
    Kim, Young-Sung
    Kim, Su-Hwan
    Kim, Kyoung-Hwa
    Jhin, Min-Ju
    Kim, Won-Kyung
    Lee, Young-Kyoo
    Seol, Yang-Jo
    Lee, Yong-Moo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL AND IMPLANT SCIENCE, 2012, 42 (06): : 204 - 211