Muscle recovery after total hip arthroplasty: prospective MRI comparison of anterior and posterior approaches

被引:3
|
作者
Robinson, Jonathan [1 ]
Bas, Marcel [2 ]
Deyer, Timothy [3 ]
Cooper, H. John [4 ]
Hepinstall, Mathew [5 ]
Ranawat, Amar [6 ]
Rodriguez, Jose A. [6 ]
机构
[1] BronxCare Hlth Syst, 199 Mt Eden Ave 4th Floor, Bronx, NY 10457 USA
[2] Lenox Hill Hosp, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Cornell Med, New York, NY USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[5] New York Univ Langone Hlth, New York, NY USA
[6] Hosp Special Surg, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
Anterior approach; MRI; muscle atrophy; muscle volume; posterior approach; total hip arthroplasty; total hip replacement; OSTEOLYSIS; DISLOCATION; STRENGTH; ATROPHY; VOLUME; CT;
D O I
10.1177/11207000221114456
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The direct anterior approach (DAA) and the posterior approach (PA) are 2 common total hip arthroplasty (THA) exposures. This prospective study quantitatively compared changes in periarticular muscle volume after DAA and PA THA. Materials: 19 patients undergoing THA were recruited prospectively from the practices of 3 fellowship-trained hip surgeons. Each surgeon performed a single approach, DAA or PA. Enrolled patients underwent a preoperative MRI of the affected hip and two subsequent postoperative MRIs at around 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Clinical evaluations were done by Harris Hip Score at each follow-up interval. Results: MRIs or 10 DAA and 9 PA patients were analysed. Groups did not differ significantly with regard to BMI, age, or preoperative muscle volume. 1 DAA patient suffered a periprosthetic fracture and was excluded from the study. DAA hips showed significant atrophy in the obturator internus (-37.3%) muscle at early follow-up, with persistent atrophy of this muscle at the final follow-up. PA hips showed significant atrophy in the obturator internus (-46.8%) and externus (-16.0%), piriformis (-8.12%), and quadratus femoris muscles (-13.1%) at early follow-up, with persistent atrophy of these muscles at final follow-up. Loss of anterior capsular integrity was present at final follow-up in 2/10 DAA hips while loss of posterior capsular integrity was present in 5/9 PA hips. There was no difference in clinical outcomes. Discussion: This study demonstrates that DAA showed less persistent muscular atrophy than PA. Regardless of surgical approach, a muscle whose tendon is detached from its insertion is likely to demonstrate persistent atrophy 6 months following THA. Although the study was not powered to compare clinical outcomes, it should be noted that no significant difference in patient outcomes was observed.
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 619
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Current Approaches
    Krismer, Martin
    EUROPEAN INSTRUCTIONAL LECTURES, VOL 9, 2009, 2009, 9 : 163 - 175
  • [22] A COMPARISON OF THE ANTEROLATERAL, TRANSTROCHANTERIC, AND POSTERIOR SURGICAL APPROACHES IN PRIMARY TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY
    VICAR, AJ
    COLEMAN, CR
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1984, (188) : 152 - 159
  • [23] Anterior muscle sparing approach for total hip arthroplasty
    Moskal, Joseph T.
    Capps, Susan G.
    Scanelli, John A.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2013, 4 (01): : 12 - 18
  • [24] A Comparison of Radiographic Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty Between the Posterior Approach and Direct Anterior Approach With Intraoperative Fluoroscopy
    Lin, Timothy J.
    Bendich, Ilya
    Ha, Alex S.
    Keeney, Benjamin J.
    Moschetti, Wayne E.
    Tomek, Ivan M.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (02): : 616 - 623
  • [25] Changes in serum creatine kinase and C-reactive protein after posterior and direct anterior approaches in total hip arthroplasty
    Maezawa, Katsuhiko
    Nozawa, Masahiko
    Gomi, Motoshi
    Sugimoto, Munehiko
    Maruyama, Yuichiro
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 32 (05) : 591 - 595
  • [26] The Accuracy of Digital Templating for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is There a Difference Between Direct Anterior and Posterior Approaches?
    Shemesh, Shai S.
    Robinson, Jonathan
    Keswani, Aakash
    Bronson, Michael J.
    Moucha, Calin S.
    Chen, Darwin
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (06): : 1884 - 1889
  • [27] Direct anterior versus posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a multicentre, prospective, randomized clinical trial
    Moerenhout, Kevin
    Derome, Pascale
    Laflamme, G. Yves
    Leduc, Stephane
    Gaspard, Henry S.
    Benoit, Benoit
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 63 (05) : E412 - E417
  • [28] Recovery and outcomes of direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty
    Barry, Jeffrey J.
    Masonis, John L.
    Mason, J. Bohannon
    ANNALS OF JOINT, 2018, 3 (06):
  • [29] Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes After Direct Anterior Versus Mini Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Hamilton, David A.
    Mcnamara, Colin A.
    Wininger, Austin E.
    Sullivan, Thomas C.
    Lambert, Bradley S.
    Incavo, Stephen J.
    Park, Kwan J.
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2025, 32
  • [30] Comparison of complications after transtrochanteric and posterolateral approaches for primary total hip arthroplasty
    Schinsky, MF
    Nercessian, OA
    Arons, RR
    Macaulay, W
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2003, 18 (04): : 430 - 434