Development and content validity of a questionnaire to assess knowledge about delirium

被引:0
|
作者
Zilezinski, Max [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Lohrmann, Renee [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hauss, Armin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Bergjan, Manuela [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Charitepl 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Charitepl 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[3] Humboldt Univ, Charitepl 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[4] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Berlin Inst Hlth, Geschaftsbereich Pflegedirekt Pflegewissensch, Charitepl 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[5] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Univ Med Halle Saale, AG Versorgungsforsch & Pflege Krankenhaus, Dept Innere Med,Med Fak, Halle, Saale, Germany
[6] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Med Fak, Dorothea Erxleben Lernzentrum Halle DELH, Projekt FORMAT, Halle, Saale, Germany
来源
关键词
Delirium; Evaluation; Education; Nursing; Content validity index; NURSES KNOWLEDGE; RISK-FACTORS; CARE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s00391-022-02015-9
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background Delirium is a neuropsychiatric syndrome that can have serious consequences and is often overlooked by healthcare professionals. The level of knowledge about delirium is often insufficient among nursing and medical staff. At the current time there is no suitable questionnaire to record the level of knowledge in German-speaking countries. Aim Development of a questionnaire and evaluation of content validity. Methods Following a literature search to identify current best practice, several questionnaires were identified. An already published questionnaire with the dimensions of basic knowledge of delirium and risk factors has been translated, adapted and extended by the dimension of nonpharmacological delirium prevention. Delirium experts assessed the relevance of the questionnaire items in two rounds of reviews. Content validity was calculated using the Content Validity Index (CVI) at item (I-CVI) and scale (S-CVI) level. Additionally, the modified Kappa (k*) was calculated using a lower 95% confidence interval (CI). Results The original 30-item questionnaire was expanded to include 18 delirium prevention items. After the first round of scoring 30 out of 48 items showed good to excellent I-CVI scores. Considering the comments, 6 items were discarded and 12 were adapted in terms of language and content. In the final version of the questionnaire 41 items with excellent scores remained. The total scale score increased from 0.88 in the first version to 1.0 in the final version. Nurses were identified as the target group, potentially also therapists and medical personnel. Conclusion The delirium knowledge questionnaire is content-valid.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 138
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Questionnaire-Based Study to Assess the Knowledge of Parents about Caries Preventive Measures
    Almutairi, Manal A.
    BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 14 (03): : 1154 - 1159
  • [42] THE DEVELOPMENT OF SCALES TO ASSESS KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES ABOUT GENITAL HERPES
    BRUCE, KEM
    MCLAUGHLIN, J
    JOURNAL OF SEX RESEARCH, 1986, 22 (01) : 73 - 84
  • [43] Content Validity of an Acupuncture Sensation Questionnaire
    Kim, Yunju
    Park, Jongbae
    Lee, Hyejung
    Bang, Heejung
    Park, Hi-Joon
    JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2008, 14 (08) : 957 - 963
  • [44] The development, reliability and validity of a questionnaire to assess the impact of dry eyes on everyday life (IDEEL)
    Abetz, L
    Venkataraman, K
    Mertzanis, P
    Chalmers, R
    Begley, C
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2003, 44 : U431 - U431
  • [45] Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess the doctors and nurses knowledge of acute oxygen therapy
    Desalu, Olufemi O.
    Aladesanmi, Adeniyi O.
    Ojuawo, Olutobi B.
    Opeyemi, Christopher M.
    Ibraheem, Rasheedah M.
    Suleiman, Zakari A.
    Oyedepo, Olanrewaju O.
    Adesina, Kikelomo T.
    Oloyede, Taofeek
    Sanya, Emmanuel O.
    Salami, A. K.
    Adeoti, Adekunle O.
    Onyedum, C. C.
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (02):
  • [46] Development and reliability of a questionnaire to assess clinical dietitians' practices and knowledge of food safety
    Maia Leite, Luisa Helena
    Waissmann, William
    Veggi, Aleandra Bento
    REVISTA DE NUTRICAO-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2007, 20 (04): : 397 - 404
  • [47] Development of a questionnaire to assess worker knowledge, attitudes and perceptions underlying dermal exposure
    Geer, Laura A.
    Curbow, Barbara A.
    Anna, Daniel H.
    Lees, Peter S. J.
    Buckley, Timothy J.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2006, 32 (03) : 209 - 218
  • [48] The Japanese version of the questionnaire about the process of recovery: development and validity and reliability testing
    Akiko Kanehara
    Risa Kotake
    Yuki Miyamoto
    Yousuke Kumakura
    Kentaro Morita
    Tomoko Ishiura
    Kimiko Shimizu
    Yumiko Fujieda
    Shuntaro Ando
    Shinsuke Kondo
    Kiyoto Kasai
    BMC Psychiatry, 17
  • [49] The Danish Psychosocial Work Environment Questionnaire (DPQ): Development, content, reliability and validity
    Clausen, Thomas
    Madsen, Ida E. H.
    Christensen, Karl Bang
    Bjorner, Jakob B.
    Poulsen, Otto M.
    Maltesen, Thomas
    Borg, Vilhelm
    Rugulies, Reiner
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2019, 45 (04) : 356 - 369
  • [50] Development of the cancer therapy satisfaction questionnaire: Item generation and content validity testing
    Abetz, L
    Coombs, JH
    Keininger, DL
    Earle, CC
    Wade, C
    Bury-Maynard, D
    Copley-Merriman, K
    Hsu, MA
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2005, 8 : S41 - S53