Development and content validity of a questionnaire to assess knowledge about delirium

被引:0
|
作者
Zilezinski, Max [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Lohrmann, Renee [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hauss, Armin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Bergjan, Manuela [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Charitepl 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Charitepl 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[3] Humboldt Univ, Charitepl 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[4] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Berlin Inst Hlth, Geschaftsbereich Pflegedirekt Pflegewissensch, Charitepl 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[5] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Univ Med Halle Saale, AG Versorgungsforsch & Pflege Krankenhaus, Dept Innere Med,Med Fak, Halle, Saale, Germany
[6] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Med Fak, Dorothea Erxleben Lernzentrum Halle DELH, Projekt FORMAT, Halle, Saale, Germany
来源
关键词
Delirium; Evaluation; Education; Nursing; Content validity index; NURSES KNOWLEDGE; RISK-FACTORS; CARE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s00391-022-02015-9
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background Delirium is a neuropsychiatric syndrome that can have serious consequences and is often overlooked by healthcare professionals. The level of knowledge about delirium is often insufficient among nursing and medical staff. At the current time there is no suitable questionnaire to record the level of knowledge in German-speaking countries. Aim Development of a questionnaire and evaluation of content validity. Methods Following a literature search to identify current best practice, several questionnaires were identified. An already published questionnaire with the dimensions of basic knowledge of delirium and risk factors has been translated, adapted and extended by the dimension of nonpharmacological delirium prevention. Delirium experts assessed the relevance of the questionnaire items in two rounds of reviews. Content validity was calculated using the Content Validity Index (CVI) at item (I-CVI) and scale (S-CVI) level. Additionally, the modified Kappa (k*) was calculated using a lower 95% confidence interval (CI). Results The original 30-item questionnaire was expanded to include 18 delirium prevention items. After the first round of scoring 30 out of 48 items showed good to excellent I-CVI scores. Considering the comments, 6 items were discarded and 12 were adapted in terms of language and content. In the final version of the questionnaire 41 items with excellent scores remained. The total scale score increased from 0.88 in the first version to 1.0 in the final version. Nurses were identified as the target group, potentially also therapists and medical personnel. Conclusion The delirium knowledge questionnaire is content-valid.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 138
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Weiterentwicklung und Inhaltsvalidierung eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung des Wissens über das DelirDevelopment and content validity of a questionnaire to assess knowledge about delirium
    Max Zilezinski
    Renée Lohrmann
    Armin Hauß
    Manuela Bergjan
    Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2023, 56 (2) : 132 - 138
  • [2] Development of a Questionnaire to Assess Knowledge and Perceptions about Edible Insects
    Guine, Raquel P. F.
    Florenca, Sofia G.
    Costa, Cristina A.
    Correia, Paula M. R.
    Ferreira, Manuela
    Duarte, Joao
    Cardoso, Ana P.
    Campos, Sofia
    Anjos, Ofelia
    INSECTS, 2022, 13 (01)
  • [3] Development of a questionnaire (OPQ) to assess patient's knowledge about osteoporosis
    Pande, KC
    de Takats, D
    Kanis, JA
    Edwards, V
    Slade, P
    McCloskey, EV
    MATURITAS, 2000, 37 (02) : 75 - 81
  • [4] CONTENT VALIDITY OF A QUESTIONNAIRE THAT ASSESS THE LEVEL OF KNOWLEDGE THAT TEACHERS HAVE REGARDING THE ATTENTION DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER
    Soroa, Marian
    Balluerka, Nekane
    Gorostiaga, Arantxa
    INTED2012: INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2012, : 5642 - 5650
  • [5] Validation of a questionnaire to assess the knowledge of the patients about their medicines
    Garcia-Delgado, P.
    Gastelurrutia, M. A.
    Baena, M., I
    Martinez-Martinez, F.
    PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE, 2009, 31 (04): : 494 - 494
  • [6] Development and Content Validity of the Bilateral Vestibulopathy Questionnaire
    van Stiphout, Lisa
    Hossein, Israt
    Kimman, Merel
    Whitney, Susan L.
    Ayiotis, Andrianna
    Strupp, Michael
    Guinand, Nils
    Perez Fornos, Angelica
    Widdershoven, Josine
    Ramos-Macias, Angel
    Van Rompaey, Vincent
    van de Berg, Raymond
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [7] Development and Validity of a Questionnaire on Dyslipidemia Dietary Knowledge
    Liang, Na
    Zhao, Qiuli
    He, Yuhua
    Li, Jingshu
    Yang, Li
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 2019
  • [8] Teachers' content knowledge about oral language: measure development and evidence of initial validity
    Piasta, Shayne B.
    Bridges, Mindy Sittner
    Park, Somin
    Nelson-Strouts, Kelley
    Hikida, Michiko
    READING AND WRITING, 2022, 35 (09) : 2131 - 2153
  • [9] Teachers’ content knowledge about oral language: measure development and evidence of initial validity
    Shayne B. Piasta
    Mindy Sittner Bridges
    Somin Park
    Kelley Nelson-Strouts
    Michiko Hikida
    Reading and Writing, 2022, 35 : 2131 - 2153
  • [10] DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A QUESTIONNAIRE TO ASSESS KNOWLEDGE IN RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
    Vega Falcon, Vladimir
    Leyva Vazquez, Maikel Yelandi
    Batista Hernandez, Noel
    REVISTA CONRADO, 2023, 19 : 51 - 60