How, and For Whom, Does Higher Education Increase Voting?

被引:9
|
作者
Ahearn, Caitlin E. [1 ]
Brand, Jennie E. [1 ]
Zhou, Xiang [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
College; Voting; Causal mediation; Heterogeneity; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; CIVIC RETURNS; POLITICAL-PARTICIPATION; COLLEGE-EDUCATION; ECONOMIC RETURNS; BIAS FORMULAS; TURNOUT; MARRIAGE; DIVORCE; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1007/s11162-022-09717-4
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The college-educated are more likely to vote than are those with less education. Prior research suggests that the effect of college attendance on voting operates directly, by increasing an individual's interest and engagement in politics through social networks or human capital accumulation. College may also increase voting indirectly by leading to degree attainment and increasing socioeconomic status, thus facilitating political participation. However, few studies have empirically tested these direct and indirect pathways or examined how these effects vary across individuals. To bridge this gap, we employ a nonparametric causal mediation analysis to examine the total, direct, and indirect effects of college attendance on voting and how these effects differ across individuals with different propensities of attending college. Using data from the 1979 and 1997 cohorts of National Longitudinal Surveys of Youth, we find large direct effects of college on self-reported voting and comparably smaller indirect effects that operate through degree completion and socioeconomic attainment. We find the largest impact of college on voting for individuals unlikely to attend, a pattern due primarily to heterogeneity in the direct effect of college. Our findings suggest that civic returns to college are not contingent upon degree completion or socioeconomic returns. An exclusive focus on the economic returns to college can mask the broader societal benefits of expanding higher education to disadvantaged youth.
引用
收藏
页码:574 / 597
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does ranked choice Voting Increase voter turnout and mobilization?
    Dowling, E.
    Tolbert, C.
    Micatka, N.
    Donovan, T.
    ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2024, 90
  • [42] STAFF INCREASE IN HIGHER-EDUCATION
    不详
    SCHOOL AND SOCIETY, 1962, 90 (2203): : 27 - 27
  • [43] How does ideology matter in the spatial model of voting?
    Garrett R. Beeler Asay
    Public Choice, 2008, 135 : 109 - 123
  • [44] How does ideology matter in the spatial model of voting?
    Asay, Garrett R. Beeler
    PUBLIC CHOICE, 2008, 135 (3-4) : 109 - 123
  • [45] Market conditions and worker training: How does it affect and whom?
    Majumdar, Sumon
    LABOUR ECONOMICS, 2007, 14 (01) : 1 - 23
  • [46] Correction: Does artificial intelligence increase learners’ sustainability in higher education: insights from Bangladesh
    Rebaka Sultana
    Mohammad Faruk
    Journal of Data, Information and Management, 2024, 6 (2): : 205 - 205
  • [47] For Whom and How Does Philosophy Matter? A Response to My Interlocutors
    Yancy, George
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHILOSOPHY, 2021, 38 (04) : 581 - 598
  • [48] Which education qualifies the examinator? whom does the endoscope belong to?
    Mössner, J
    LEBER MAGEN DARM, 1999, 29 (05) : 216 - +
  • [49] How Does Common Ground Increase?
    Convertino, Gregorio
    Mentis, Helena M.
    Ting, Alex Y. W.
    Rosson, Mary Beth
    Carroll, John M.
    GROUP'07: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2007 INTERNATIONAL ACM CONFERENCE ON SUPPORTING GROUP WORK, 2007, : 225 - 228
  • [50] Young women and higher education in Peru: how does gender shape their educational trajectories?
    Guerrero, Gabriela
    Rojas, Vanessa
    GENDER AND EDUCATION, 2020, 32 (08) : 1090 - 1108