Measurement Properties of Patient Reported Outcome Scales: A Systematic Review

被引:3
|
作者
Stallwood, Emma [1 ]
Elsman, Ellen B. M. [1 ]
Monsour, Andrea [1 ]
Baba, Ami [1 ]
Butcher, Nancy J. J. [1 ,2 ]
Offringa, Martin [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Sick Children Res Inst, Child Hlth Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychiat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Hosp Sick Children, Div Neonatol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Hosp Sick Children, Peter Gilgan Ctr Res & Learning, 686 Bay St,11th Floor, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
NIH TOOLBOX(R); ITEM BANK; HEALTH; COSMIN; CONSENSUS; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1542/peds.2023-061489
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
CONTEXTRecently a standard set for overall pediatric health outcomes in routine care was developed, which includes patient (or proxy) reported outcome measures (PROMs) for global health, cognitive functioning, and self-efficacy. OBJECTIVESTo determine whether the following PROMs have sufficient measurement properties to be used in pediatric routine care: PROMIS Pediatric and Parent Proxy Scale - Global Health 7+2, PROMIS Parent Proxy Short Form - Cognitive Function 7a, and NIH Toolbox Self-Efficacy CAT Ages 13 to 17. DATA SOURCESEmbase, Psych INFO, and Web of Science were searched from year of inception of each PROM to May 25, 2020; Medline to October 24, 2022. STUDY SELECTIONEnglish, full-text peer-reviewed articles that evaluated measurement properties of included PROMs were eligible. DATA EXTRACTIONThe COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews was used to appraise eligible studies and synthesize the overall evidence. RESULTSScreening >4000 titles yielded 4 to 6 eligible empirical studies for each PROM. The PROMIS instruments had sufficient content validity with low-quality evidence and at least low-quality evidence for sufficient structural validity and internal consistency. The NIH Toolbox lacked essential evidence for content validity. LIMITATIONSAssessments of measurement properties were based on information reported in the included studies; underreporting might have led to less favorable ratings. CONCLUSIONSThe PROMIS instruments assessed in this review measure their intended construct for their targeted age group; clinicians can use these PROMs in pediatric routine care. Additional studies evaluating measurement properties, including content validity, are needed for the NIH Toolbox before it should be recommended for use in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Patient-reported outcome measures for diabetes self-care: A systematic review of measurement properties
    Lee, Jiyeon
    Lee, Eun-Hyun
    Chae, Duckhee
    Kim, Chun-Ja
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2020, 105
  • [32] REVIEW OF TERMINOLOGY OF MEASUREMENT PROPERTIES FOR PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES
    Rabenda, V.
    Leclercq, V.
    Reginster, J. Y.
    Bruyere, O.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 29 : S494 - S494
  • [33] Patient-reported outcome measurement implementation in cancer survivors: a systematic review
    Singhal, Surbhi
    Dickerson, James
    Glover, Michael J.
    Roy, Mohana
    Chiu, Michelle
    Ellis-Caleo, Timothy
    Hui, Gavin
    Tamayo, Carla
    Loecher, Nele
    Wong, Hong-Nei
    Heathcote, Lauren C.
    Schapira, Lidia
    JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2024, 18 (02) : 223 - 244
  • [34] Patient-reported outcome measurement implementation in cancer survivors: a systematic review
    Surbhi Singhal
    James Dickerson
    Michael J. Glover
    Mohana Roy
    Michelle Chiu
    Timothy Ellis-Caleo
    Gavin Hui
    Carla Tamayo
    Nele Loecher
    Hong-nei Wong
    Lauren C. Heathcote
    Lidia Schapira
    Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2024, 18 : 223 - 244
  • [35] Patient-reported outcome measures for facial skin cancer: a systematic review and evaluation of the quality of their measurement properties
    Dobbs, T. D.
    Samarendra, H.
    Hughes, S.
    Hutchings, H. A.
    Whitaker, I.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2019, 180 (05) : 1018 - 1029
  • [36] Patient-reported outcome instruments that evaluate adherence behaviours in adults with asthma: a systematic review of measurement properties
    Gagne, Myriam
    Boulet, Louis-Philippe
    Perez, Norma
    Moisan, Jocelyne
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 84 (09) : 1928 - 1940
  • [37] Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Medication Adherence in Cardiovascular Disease: A COSMIN Systematic Review
    Tegegn, Henok G.
    Wark, Stuart
    Tursan d'Espaignet, Edouard
    Spark, M. Joy
    CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2022, 42 (11) : 879 - 908
  • [38] A systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures used in gout: an evaluation of their content and measurement properties
    Carly A. Janssen
    Martijn A. H. Oude Voshaar
    Peter M. ten Klooster
    Tim L. Th. A. Jansen
    Harald E. Vonkeman
    Mart A. F. J. van de Laar
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 17
  • [39] SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF MEASUREMENT PROPERTIES OF PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: A GRAPPA-OMERACT INITIATIVE
    Hojgaard, P.
    Klokker, L.
    Orbai, A-M.
    Holmsted, K.
    Bartels, E. M.
    Leung, Y. Y.
    Goel, N.
    de Wit, M.
    Gladman, D.
    Mease, P.
    Dreyer, L.
    Kristensen, L. E.
    FitzGerald, O.
    Tillett, W.
    Gossec, L.
    Helliwell, P.
    Strand, V.
    Ogdie, A.
    Terwee, C.
    Christensen, R.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2017, 76 : 1332 - 1332
  • [40] A systematic review of measurement properties of patient reported outcome measures in psoriatic arthritis: A GRAPPA-OMERACT initiative
    Hojgaard, Pil
    Klokker, Louise
    Orbai, Ana -Maria
    Holmsted, Kim
    Bartels, Else M.
    Leung, Ying Ying
    Goel, Niti
    de Wit, Maarten
    Gladman, Dafna D.
    Mease, Philip
    Dreyer, Lene
    Kristensen, Lars E.
    FitzGerald, Oliver
    Tillett, William
    Gossec, Laure
    Helliwell, Philip
    Strand, Vibeke
    Ogdie, Alexis
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    Christensen, Robin
    SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2018, 47 (05) : 654 - 665