Optimal Timing of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Saricilar, Erin C. [1 ]
Patel, Kiraati [1 ]
Gatmaitan, Raleene [1 ]
Puttaswamy, Vikram [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal North Shore Hosp, Reserve Rd, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
关键词
Guidelines; TEVAR; Type B aortic dissection; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; GUIDELINES; PREDICTORS; MANAGEMENT; IMMEDIATE; SOCIETY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.02.080
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Type B aortic dissections (TBAD) have a high mortality rate and are challenging to both classify and manage. There is significant evidence supporting the use of early intervention in complicated TBAD with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Currently, there is equipoise regarding the optimal timing for TEVAR in TBAD. This systematic review answers whether early TEVAR in the hyperacute or acute phase of the disease has improved aorta related events in the one year follow up period with no change in mortality rate when compared with TEVAR in the subacute or chronic phase.Data sources: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses literature search guidelines for MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Reviews until 12 April 2021. Inclusion and exclusion criteria targeting the review objective and high quality research were employed by separate authors.Review methods: These studies were then reviewed for suitability, risk of bias, and heterogeneity using the ROBINS-I tool. Results were extracted for the meta-analysis with RevMan using odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals with I2 used to assess heterogeneity.Results: Twenty articles were included. A meta-analysis showed no significant difference between acute phase TEVAR (excluding the hyperacute phase) and subacute or chronic phase TEVAR for the all cause 30 day and one year mortality rates. Aorta related events in the 30 day post-operative period were unaffected by the timing of intervention but had significant improvement in aorta related events in the one year follow up favouring TEVAR in the acute phase compared with subacute or chronic phase. Risk of confounding was high but with low heterogeneity.Conclusion: Without prospective randomised controlled studies, it is evident that there is improved aortic remodelling in long term follow up with intervention in the acute setting from three to 14 days after symptom onset. This suggests that TEVAR in the acute period of TBAD is both safe and beneficial, and can be considered for early stent grafting based on clinical, anatomical and patient factors.
引用
收藏
页码:851 / 860
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimal Timing of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Saricilar, E. C.
    Patel, K.
    Gatmaitan, R.
    Puttaswamy, V
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 78 (02)
  • [2] Response to Re: "Optimal Timing of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"
    Saricilar, Erin C.
    Puttaswamy, Vikram
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 67 (01) : 180 - 181
  • [3] What is the optimal timing for thoracic endovascular aortic repair in uncomplicated Type B aortic dissection?
    Jubouri, Matti
    Bashir, Mohamad
    Tan, Sven Z. C. P.
    Bailey, Damian
    Anderson, Richard
    Nienaber, Christoph A.
    Coselli, Joseph S.
    Williams, Ian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2022, 37 (04) : 993 - 1001
  • [4] Optimal Timing of Pre-emptive Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Network Meta-Analysis
    Naito, Noritsugu
    Takagi, Hisato
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2024,
  • [5] A systematic review and meta-analysis of retrograde type A aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with type B aortic dissection
    Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh, Sadeq
    Halloum, Nancy
    Scali, Salvatore
    Kriege, Marc
    Abualia, Mohannad
    Stamenovic, Davor
    Izzat, Mohammad Bashar
    Bohan, Patrick
    Kloeckner, Roman
    Oezkur, Mehmet
    Dorweiler, Bernhard
    Treede, Hendrik
    El Beyrouti, Hazem
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (15) : E32944
  • [6] Thoracic endovascular aortic repair or best medical therapy for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection? A meta-analysis
    Yang, Jue
    Shi, Yun
    Jiang, Junhao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 63 (03): : 288 - 298
  • [7] Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection
    Sa, Michel Pompeu
    Jacquemyn, Xander
    Sultan, Ibrahim
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 67 (05)
  • [8] Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection
    Czerny, Martin
    Rylski, Bartosz
    Beyersdorf, Friedhelm
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 31 (06) : 606 - 610
  • [9] Acute or Subacute, the Optimal Timing for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yang, Yang
    Zhang, Xi-Hao
    Chen, Zuo-Guan
    Diao, Yong-Peng
    Wu, Zhi-Yuan
    Li, Yong-Jun
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [10] Retrograde Type A Aortic Dissection After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Yanqing
    Zhang, Simeng
    Liu, Lei
    Lu, Qingsheng
    Zhang, Tianyi
    Jing, Zaiping
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2017, 6 (09):