Optimal Timing of Pre-emptive Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Network Meta-Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Naito, Noritsugu [1 ,2 ]
Takagi, Hisato [1 ]
机构
[1] Shizuoka Med Ctr, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Shizuoka, Japan
[2] Shizuoka Med Ctr, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, 762-1 Nagasawa,Shimizu Cho, Shizuoka 4118611, Japan
关键词
uncomplicated type B aortic dissection; endovascular surgery; network meta-analysis; INTERNATIONAL REGISTRY; STENT-GRAFT; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; MANAGEMENT; SURVIVAL; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1177/15266028241245282
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This network meta-analysis compares outcomes of optimal medical therapy (OMT) and pre-emptive thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection at different phases of chronicity. Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through November 2023. Pooled short-term outcomes (short-term mortality, perioperative complications) and long-term outcomes (all-cause mortality, aortic-related mortality, aortic re-intervention rates) were calculated. Results: Systematic review identified 17 studies (2 randomized controlled trials, 3 propensity score matching, and 2 inverse probability weighting). Subacute-phase intervention had lower short-term mortality than the acute-phase (hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval [CI]]=0.60 [0.38-0.94], p=0.027). No significant differences were observed in aortic rupture and paraplegia. Acute-phase TEVAR had a higher stroke incidence than subacute-phase intervention (HR [95% CI]=2.63 [1.36-5.09], p=0.042), chronic (HR [95% CI]=2.5 [1.03-6.2], p=0.043), and OMT (HR [95% CI]=1.57 [1.12-2.18], p=0.008). Acute-phase TEVAR had higher long-term all-cause mortality than subacute-phase intervention (HR [95% CI]=1.34 [1.03-1.74], p=0.03). Optimal medical therapy had elevated long-term all-cause mortality compared with subacute-phase TEVAR (HR [95% CI]=1.67 [1.25-2.33], p<0.001) and increased long-term aortic-related mortality vs acute-phase (HR [95% CI]=2.08 [1.31-3.31], p=0.002) and subacute-phase (HR [95% CI]=2.6 [1.62-4.18], p<0.01) interventions. No significant differences were observed in aortic re-intervention rates. Conclusions: Pre-emptive TEVAR may offer lower all-cause mortality and aortic-related mortality than OMT. Considering lower short-term mortality, perioperative stroke rate, and long-term mortality, our findings support pre-emptive TEVAR during the subacute phase. Clinical Impact The optimal timing of pre-emptive thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection remains uncertain. This network meta-analysis suggests that the subacute phase (14-90 days from symptom onset) emerges as the optimal timing for pre-emptive TEVAR. This window is associated with lower rates of short-term complications and higher long-term survival rates compared with alternative strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimal Timing of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Saricilar, E. C.
    Patel, K.
    Gatmaitan, R.
    Puttaswamy, V
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 78 (02)
  • [2] Optimal Timing of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Saricilar, Erin C.
    Patel, Kiraati
    Gatmaitan, Raleene
    Puttaswamy, Vikram
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 65 (06) : 851 - 860
  • [3] What is the optimal timing for thoracic endovascular aortic repair in uncomplicated Type B aortic dissection?
    Jubouri, Matti
    Bashir, Mohamad
    Tan, Sven Z. C. P.
    Bailey, Damian
    Anderson, Richard
    Nienaber, Christoph A.
    Coselli, Joseph S.
    Williams, Ian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2022, 37 (04) : 993 - 1001
  • [4] Entry Site Is Associated With Aortic Enlargement After Pre-emptive Endovascular Repair for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection
    Cho, Tomoki
    Uchida, Keiji
    Yasuda, Shota
    Izubuchi, Ryo
    Kaneko, Shotaro
    Matsumoto, Atsushi
    Ikematsu, Makoto
    Kakuta, Sho
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2023,
  • [5] Thoracic endovascular aortic repair or best medical therapy for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection? A meta-analysis
    Yang, Jue
    Shi, Yun
    Jiang, Junhao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 63 (03): : 288 - 298
  • [6] Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection
    Sa, Michel Pompeu
    Jacquemyn, Xander
    Sultan, Ibrahim
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 67 (05)
  • [7] Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection
    Czerny, Martin
    Rylski, Bartosz
    Beyersdorf, Friedhelm
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 31 (06) : 606 - 610
  • [8] Response to Re: "Optimal Timing of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"
    Saricilar, Erin C.
    Puttaswamy, Vikram
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 67 (01) : 180 - 181
  • [9] Timing of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection and the association with complications
    Torrent, Daniel J.
    McFarland, Graeme E.
    Wang, Grace
    Malas, Mahmoud
    Pearce, Benjamin J.
    Aucoin, Victoria
    Neal, Dan
    Spangler, Emily L.
    Novak, Zdenek
    Scali, Salvatore T.
    Beck, Adam W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 73 (03) : 826 - 835
  • [10] Timing of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Uncomplicated Acute Type B Aortic Dissection and Association With Complications
    Torrent, Daniel
    Wang, Grace J.
    Malas, Mahmoud B.
    Pearce, Benjamin J.
    Spangler, Emily L.
    Novak, Zdenek
    Beck, Adam W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 67 (06) : E186 - E186