Improving the quality of co-evolution intermolecular contact prediction with DisVis

被引:0
|
作者
van Keulen, Siri C. [1 ]
Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Fac Sci Chem, Bijvoet Ctr Biomol Res, Padualaan 8, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
docking; false positive filtering; HADDOCK; intermolecular residue-residue contacts; protein-protein complexes; PROTEIN; DOCKING; SERVER;
D O I
10.1002/prot.26514
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The steep rise in protein sequences and structures has paved the way for bioinformatics approaches to predict residue-residue interactions in protein complexes. Multiple sequence alignments are commonly used in contact predictions to identify co-evolving residues. These contacts, however, often include false positives (FPs), which may impair their use to predict three dimensional structures of biomolecular complexes and affect the accuracy of the generated models. Previously, we have developed DisVis to identify FP in mass spectrometry cross-linking data. DisVis allows to assess the accessible interaction space between two proteins consistent with a set of distance restraints. Here, we investigate if a similar approach could be applied to co-evolution predicted contacts in order to improve their precision prior to using them for modeling. We analyze co-evolution contact predictions with DisVis for a set of 26 protein-protein complexes. The DisVis-reranked and the original co-evolution contacts are then used to model the complexes with our integrative docking software HADDOCK using different filtering scenarios. Our results show that HADDOCK is robust with respect to the precision of the predicted contacts due to the 50% random contact removal during docking and can enhance the quality of docking predictions when combined with DisVis filtering for low precision contact data. DisVis can thus have a beneficial effect on low quality data, but overall HADDOCK can accommodate FP restraints without negatively impacting the quality of the resulting models. Other more precision-sensitive docking protocols might, however, benefit from the increased precision of the predicted contacts after DisVis filtering.
引用
收藏
页码:1407 / 1416
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Co-evolution in negotiation games
    Murakami, Y
    Sato, H
    Namatame, A
    [J]. ICCIMA 2001: FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND MULTIMEDIA APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 241 - 245
  • [32] Cytonuclear integration and co-evolution
    Daniel B. Sloan
    Jessica M. Warren
    Alissa M. Williams
    Zhiqiang Wu
    Salah E. Abdel-Ghany
    Adam J. Chicco
    Justin C. Havird
    [J]. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2018, 19 : 635 - 648
  • [33] Co-evolution of RDF Datasets
    Faisal, Sidra
    Endris, Kemele M.
    Shekarpour, Saeedeh
    Auer, Soeren
    Vidal, Maria-Esther
    [J]. WEB ENGINEERING (ICWE 2016), 2016, 9671 : 225 - 243
  • [34] Co-evolution of robot behaviors
    Daley, R
    Schultz, AC
    Grefenstette, JJ
    [J]. MOBILE ROBOTS XIV, 1999, 3838 : 228 - 239
  • [35] CO-EVOLUTION IN HIV ENZYMES
    Boba, P.
    Weil, P.
    Hoffgaard, F.
    Hamacher, K.
    [J]. BIONFORMATICS 2010: PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS, 2010, : 39 - 47
  • [36] The co-evolution of individual and network
    Lazer, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL SOCIOLOGY, 2001, 25 (01): : 69 - 108
  • [37] Co-evolution, determinism and robustness
    Blair, AD
    Sklar, E
    Funes, P
    [J]. SIMULATED EVOLUTION AND LEARNING, 1999, 1585 : 389 - 396
  • [38] Entrepreneurship and Co-evolution in Tourism
    Valeri, Marco
    Fadlon, Leslie
    [J]. SMART TOURISM AS A DRIVER FOR CULTURE AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, : 49 - 60
  • [39] Co-evolution in an institutionalized environment
    Rodrigues, S
    Child, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2003, 40 (08) : 2137 - 2162
  • [40] WHAT ARE THE MECHANISMS OF CO-EVOLUTION
    SMITH, PK
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1983, 6 (01) : 114 - 115