Patient decisions regarding cancer gene panel testing: An exploratory study

被引:1
|
作者
Emmet, Margaret M. [1 ]
Chang, Yuchiao [2 ]
Chung, Daniel C. [1 ,3 ]
Caruso, Alyson R. [1 ]
Shannon, Kristen M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Ctr Canc Risk Assessment, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Gen Internal Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Boston, MA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
cancer genetics; decision-making; disparities; genetic testing; multi-gene panel; HEREDITARY BREAST;
D O I
10.1002/jgc4.1824
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
This study examined factors associated with the selection of a specific multi-gene panel test by patients in a cancer genetic counseling clinic. We surveyed patients who received pre-test genetic counseling at the Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Cancer Risk Assessment (CCRA) in 2019 and their genetic counselors to assess demographic and clinical characteristics, patient concerns, and session outcome. Ultimately, 228 eligible participants completed the survey, of whom 85.1% consented to genetic testing. Of those who chose testing, 56.2% selected the largest panel type available, a pan-cancer panel that included both actionable and inactionable genes. White patients were more likely than non-white patients to pursue testing. Among testers, number of testing options offered, participant educational attainment, age, and NCCN Guidelines status were associated with patient choice between four panel options. Some patient concerns, including impact of results on future cancer screening and family dynamics, were also linked to test choice. Several other participant characteristics including income, cancer diagnosis, and family structure did not appear to be predictive of testing choice. Our results confirmed the patient preference for large gene panels and identified a limited number of associations between patient characteristics and concerns and testing choice. We noted however that a significant number of participants did not choose the most commonly selected test, and that test choice is difficult to predict based on clinical and demographic factors. Our results also provide further evidence of well-documented disparities in cancer genetic testing. Study limitations do not allow our findings to be generalized to all cancer genetic counseling patients. Further research is needed to examine how and why patients choose between multiple genetic test options in the cancer setting. This study was one of the first to examine patient choice between a full spectrum of multi-gene panel options.
引用
收藏
页码:1103 / 1112
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] TESTING FOR CANCER GENES - DECISIONS, DECISIONS
    SCHNEIDER, KA
    PATENAUDE, AF
    GARBER, JE
    NATURE MEDICINE, 1995, 1 (04) : 302 - 303
  • [22] Patient decisions regarding prenatal aneuploid fish
    Wray, A
    Landy, H
    Meck, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (06) : S163 - S163
  • [23] Effectiveness of a genetic test panel designed for gynecological cancer: an exploratory study
    Koichi Ida
    Tsutomu Miyamoto
    Shotaro Higuchi
    Hodaka Takeuchi
    Satoshi Yamada
    Motoki Ono
    Hiroshi Nishihara
    Tanri Shiozawa
    Medical Oncology, 2019, 36
  • [24] Effectiveness of a genetic test panel designed for gynecological cancer: an exploratory study
    Ida, Koichi
    Miyamoto, Tsutomu
    Higuchi, Shotaro
    Takeuchi, Hodaka
    Yamada, Satoshi
    Ono, Motoki
    Nishihara, Hiroshi
    Shiozawa, Tanri
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 36 (07)
  • [25] Outcomes of Gene Panel Testing for Sensorineural Hearing Loss in a Diverse Patient Cohort
    Liao, Elizabeth N.
    Taketa, Emily
    Mohamad, Noura, I
    Chan, Dylan K.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (09) : E2233441
  • [26] Gene panel testing for breast cancer should not be used to confirm syndromic gene associations
    Evans, D. Gareth
    Howell, Sacha J.
    Frayling, Ian M.
    Peltonen, Juha
    NPJ GENOMIC MEDICINE, 2018, 3
  • [27] Gene panel testing for breast cancer should not be used to confirm syndromic gene associations
    D. Gareth Evans
    Sacha J. Howell
    Ian M. Frayling
    Juha Peltonen
    npj Genomic Medicine, 3
  • [28] Multi-gene panel testing in an unselected endometrial cancer cohort
    Ring, Kari Lassen
    Bruegl, Amanda S.
    Allen, Brian
    Elkin, Eric P.
    Singh, Nanda
    Hartman, Anne-Renee
    Broaddus, Russell
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [29] Implementation of next generation cancer gene panel testing in a large HMO
    Haque, R.
    Alvarado, M.
    Ahmed, S. A.
    Chung, J.
    Tiller, G. E.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [30] Health care professionals' attitudes toward cancer gene panel testing
    Klugman, Susan
    Schnabel, Freya
    Alim, Ishraq
    Loke, Johnny
    Arun, Banu
    Chun Kim, Jennifer
    Ostrer, Harry
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2021, 27 (05): : 499 - 500