A Pilot Study Comparing Sensation in Buried Versus Nonburied Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps

被引:2
|
作者
Lu Wang, Marcos [1 ]
Qin, Nancy [1 ]
Chadab, Tara M. [2 ]
Chen, Yunchan [1 ]
Huang, Hao [2 ]
Ellison, Angela [1 ]
Otterburn, David M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Weill Cornell Med, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, New York, NY USA
[2] NewYork Presbyterian Hosp, New York, NY USA
[3] Weill Cornell Med, 525 E 68th St,Payson7-708, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
breast reconstruction; neurotization; nerve graft; sensation; NIPPLE-SPARING MASTECTOMY; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; TRAM FLAP; SENSIBILITY; IMPROVES; NEUROTIZATION; SENSITIVITY; OUTCOMES; RETURN;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000003530
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundNeurotized deep inferior epigastic perforator (DIEP) flaps have been shown to improve sensory recovery after mastectomy and reconstruction. With the recent trend toward nipple-sparing mastectomies, sensation likely originates within the buried DIEP flap and then innervates the breast skin. In contrast, for patients undergoing skin-sparing mastectomies, the DIEP flap skin is preserved, brought up to the surface, and directly innervated. In this study, we aim to evaluate inner breast region sensation between patients whose DIEP flap is buried and whose DIEP flap skin is brought to the surface.MethodsSeventy patients who underwent mastectomy with immediate reconstruction using the DIEP flap were prospectively identified. Of these, 60 patients underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy with buried DIEP flap reconstruction while 10 patients underwent skin-sparing mastectomy with nonburied DIEP flap reconstruction. Patients in both cohorts received nerve grafting using the 70 x 1-2-mm Avance Nerve Graft in identical fashion. Sensitivity evaluation was performed in five inner breast regions (corresponding to the nonburied DIEP flap area).ResultsIn the buried DIEP cohort, at 6 months postoperatively, there was a statistically significant difference in inner breast region sensitivity measurements compared with baseline levels (P < 0.001). In contrast, in the nonburied DIEP cohort, at 6 months postoperatively, sensation in the inner breast region was comparable with preoperative baseline levels (P = 0.236). At 24 months postoperatively, inner breast region sensitivity measurements in both cohorts were comparable with preoperative baseline measurements (P > 0.05).ConclusionsNeurotized DIEP flap skin raised directly to the surface confers earlier sensory recovery than buried DIEP flaps. In patients who undergo skin-sparing mastectomies with nonburied DIEP flap reconstruction, they can expect significantly better sensation in the inner regions of the breast at 6 months postoperatively. In patients who undergo nipple-sparing mastectomies with buried DIEP flap reconstruction, they can expect sensation in the inner breast to return to preoperative baseline levels at a later time point-beginning as early as 24 months postoperatively.
引用
收藏
页码:S574 / S577
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimising the preoperative planning of deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for breast reconstruction
    Casares Santiago, Miguel
    Garcia-Tutor, Emilio
    Rodriguez Caravaca, Gil
    del Cerro Gonzalez, Julian
    Marie Klein, Lea
    Alonso-Burgos, Alberto
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (09) : 2097 - 2108
  • [32] Deconstructing the Reconstruction: Evaluation of Process and Efficiency in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps
    Haddock, Nicholas T.
    Teotia, Sumeet S.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 145 (04) : 717E - 724E
  • [33] Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction:experience with 43 flaps
    YAN Xiaoqing YANG Hongyan ZHAO Yuming YOU Lei XU Jun Division of Plastic Surgery Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Beijing China Division of Plastic Surgery Haidian Hospital Beijing China
    Chinese Medical Journal, 2007, 120 (05) : 380 - 384
  • [34] Photoplethysmography in postoperative monitoring of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flaps
    Kyriacou, P. A.
    Zaman, T.
    Pal, S. K.
    PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2020, 41 (12)
  • [35] Deconstructing the Reconstruction: Evaluation of Process and Efficiency in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps
    Daar, David A.
    Salibian, Ara A.
    Frey, Jordan D.
    Karp, Nolan S.
    Choi, Mihye
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 147 (03) : 559E - 560E
  • [36] Defining Transfusion Criteria After Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flaps
    Chen, Brian
    Lamb, Tara
    Van Wyk, Johan
    Orminski, Krysta
    Suydam, Erin
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2024, 138 : 31 - 32
  • [37] Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator free flaps in head and neck reconstruction
    Zhang, Bin
    Li, De-zhi
    Xu, Zhen-gang
    Tang, Ping-zhang
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 45 (02) : 116 - 120
  • [38] Conjoint Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flaps: Case Series of Two Patients with Subfascial Communication of the Deep Inferior Epigastric Vein
    Reddy, Gangadasu S.
    Kagen, Alex
    Samson, William
    Sultan, Mark
    Dayan, Joseph
    Smith, Mark L.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 134 (02)
  • [39] THE PERFORATOR ANGIOSOME: A NEW CONCEPT IN THE DESIGN OF DEEP INFERIOR EPIGASTRIC ARTERY PERFORATOR FLAPS FOR BREAST RECONSTRUCTION
    Rozen, Warren M.
    Ashton, Mark W.
    Le Roux, Cara Michelle
    Pan, Wei-Ren
    Corlett, Russell J.
    MICROSURGERY, 2010, 30 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [40] Fat necrosis in free rectus abdominis and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps - Reply
    Kroll, SS
    Reece, GP
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 107 (06) : 1611 - 1612