Utilization of a Low-Cost Sensor Array for Mobile Methane Monitoring

被引:0
|
作者
Silberstein, Jonathan [1 ]
Wellbrook, Matthew [2 ]
Hannigan, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Mech Engn, 1111 Engn Dr, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Urban Labs, 33 North LaSalle St Suite 1600, Chicago, IL 60602 USA
关键词
low-cost sensors; oil and gas well emissions; mobile monitoring; model calibration; quantification; screening tools; ABANDONED OIL; GAS SENSORS; PERFORMANCE; EMISSIONS; QUANTIFICATION; CALIBRATION; WELLS;
D O I
10.3390/s24020519
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The use of low-cost sensors (LCSs) for the mobile monitoring of oil and gas emissions is an understudied application of low-cost air quality monitoring devices. To assess the efficacy of low-cost sensors as a screening tool for the mobile monitoring of fugitive methane emissions stemming from well sites in eastern Colorado, we colocated an array of low-cost sensors (XPOD) with a reference grade methane monitor (Aeris Ultra) on a mobile monitoring vehicle from 15 August through 27 September 2023. Fitting our low-cost sensor data with a bootstrap and aggregated random forest model, we found a high correlation between the reference and XPOD CH4 concentrations (r = 0.719) and a low experimental error (RMSD = 0.3673 ppm). Other calibration models, including multilinear regression and artificial neural networks (ANN), were either unable to distinguish individual methane spikes above baseline or had a significantly elevated error (RMSDANN = 0.4669 ppm) when compared to the random forest model. Using out-of-bag predictor permutations, we found that sensors that showed the highest correlation with methane displayed the greatest significance in our random forest model. As we reduced the percentage of colocation data employed in the random forest model, errors did not significantly increase until a specific threshold (50 percent of total calibration data). Using a peakfinding algorithm, we found that our model was able to predict 80 percent of methane spikes above 2.5 ppm throughout the duration of our field campaign, with a false response rate of 35 percent.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A low-cost, high-accuracy temperature sensor array
    Hidalgo-Lopez, Jose A.
    Romero-Sanchez, Jorge
    Fernandez-Ramos, Raquel
    Martin-Canales, Jose F.
    Rios-Gomez, Jose F.
    [J]. MEASUREMENT, 2018, 125 : 425 - 431
  • [22] Purely Inertial Navigation with a Low-Cost MEMS Sensor Array
    Blocher, Lukas
    Mayer, Wolfram
    Arena, Marco
    Radovic, Dusan
    Hiller, Tobias
    Gerlach, Joachim
    Bringmann, Oliver
    [J]. 2021 8TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INERTIAL SENSORS AND SYSTEMS (INERTIAL 2021), 2021,
  • [23] A low-cost flexible pH sensor array for wound assessment
    Rahimi, Rahim
    Ochoa, Manuel
    Parupudi, Tejasvi
    Zhao, Xin
    Yazdi, Iman K.
    Dokmeci, Mehmet R.
    Tamayol, Ali
    Khademhosseini, Ali
    Ziaie, Babak
    [J]. SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL, 2016, 229 : 609 - 617
  • [24] TERRAIN PREDICTION WITH A LOW-COST LIDAR SENSOR FOR MOBILE ROBOTS
    Edlinger, R.
    Nuechter, A.
    [J]. 7TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP LOWCOST 3D - SENSORS, ALGORITHMS, APPLICATIONS, 2022, 48-2 (W1): : 81 - 86
  • [25] Effective Utilization of IoT for Low-cost Crop Monitoring and Automation
    Suriyachai, Petcharat
    Pansit, Jakkapong
    [J]. 2018 21ST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON WIRELESS PERSONAL MULTIMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS (WPMC), 2018, : 246 - 251
  • [26] Miniature Low-Cost Carbon Dioxide Sensor for Mobile Devices
    Scholz, Louisa
    Perez, Alvaro Ortiz
    Bierer, Benedikt
    Eaksen, Ponkanok
    Woellenstein, Juergen
    Palzer, Stefan
    [J]. IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2017, 17 (09) : 2889 - 2895
  • [27] A Paper-Based Flexible Tactile Sensor Array for Low-Cost Wearable Human Health Monitoring
    Luo, Weijie
    Sharma, Vikas
    Young, Darrin J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MICROELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEMS, 2020, 29 (05) : 825 - 831
  • [28] A Low-Cost Intelligent Mobile Indoor Environment Monitoring System
    Liu, Peng
    Wang, Mingjie
    Dong, Wenkai
    Jiang, Shengqian
    Wang, Yanli
    Zhu, Quan
    Li, Bing
    Chen, Xin
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATERIALS ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY AND CONTROL, 2016, 67 : 226 - 230
  • [29] Low-Cost Power Monitoring System Using Mobile Handset
    Oh, Seaseung
    Byeon, Gilsung
    Kang, Sang-Hee
    Jang, Gilsoo
    [J]. 2011 IEEE POWER AND ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, 2011,
  • [30] A Mobile and Low-Cost System for Environmental Monitoring: A Case Study
    Velasco, Alejandro
    Ferrero, Renato
    Gandino, Filippo
    Montrucchio, Bartolomeo
    Rebaudengo, Maurizio
    [J]. SENSORS, 2016, 16 (05)