Single Digit Index Finger Amputation-To Replant or Not?

被引:0
|
作者
Thibedeau, Marshall [1 ]
Ramji, Maleka [2 ]
McKenzie, Madeleine [3 ]
Yeung, Justin [2 ]
Nickerson, Duncan Alexander [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Sect Plast Surg, Suite 200,2004-14 St NW, Calgary, AB T2M 3N3, Canada
[3] Concordia Univ, Dept Biol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
amputation; traumatic; Canada; finger injuries; replantation; revision amputation; surveys and questionnaires; UNITED-STATES; CHILDREN; REVASCULARIZATION; SURVIVAL; SURGERY; SUCCESS; RATES; COST;
D O I
10.1177/22925503211024753
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Single index finger replantation is often listed as a contraindication due to its hindrance of hand function when replanted. Recent studies demonstrate comparable subjective and global functional outcomes for index flexor zone II finger replants versus revision amputations. We therefore sought to identify current opinions of plastic surgery trainees and staff treating single index finger zone II amputations including influential patient and injury characteristics. Methods: With the approval of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgery, a 17-question survey was sent via email to all listed members on 3 separate occasions. Participation was voluntary and survey responses were compiled and analyzed using SPSS statistical software. Results: Survey response rate was 38.5%. When asked whether the surgeon would replant a single index digit, flexor zone II, sharp amputation, 55.3% of respondents chose "yes," while 44.7% responded "no." Staff (51.5%) were less likely to replant a single index digit amputation. Likelihood of replant dropped substantially in crush (12.4%) and avulsion (17.1%) injury. Smoking was the most likely patient characteristic to change a surgeon's decision (61.9%). Poor range of motion (77.5%) and patient satisfaction (72.5%) were the most frequently listed reasons not to replant. Conclusion: Among Canadian plastic surgeons, there exists disagreement in how single index flexor zone II amputations should be managed. In review of the literature, these notions and previous teaching around replants highlight many inherent surgeon biases with regard to the merit and value of single digit replantation.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 52
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PERFORMING AMPUTATION OF THE BOVINE DIGIT
    WEAVER, AD
    VETERINARY MEDICINE, 1991, 86 (12) : 1230 - 1233
  • [22] ALTERNATIVES TO DIGIT AMPUTATION IN CATTLE
    BAXTER, GM
    BROOME, TA
    LAKRITZ, J
    PARKS, AH
    WALLACE, CE
    COMPENDIUM ON CONTINUING EDUCATION FOR THE PRACTICING VETERINARIAN, 1991, 13 (06): : 1022 - &
  • [23] Replant your own index finger? A survey of plastic surgeons and hand therapists in Southeast England
    Sainsbury, David
    Cavale, Naveen
    Jones, Martin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2008, 31 (03) : 153 - 153
  • [24] Replant your own index finger? A survey of plastic surgeons and hand therapists in Southeast England
    David Sainsbury
    Naveen Cavale
    Martin Jones
    European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2008, 31 (3) : 153 - 153
  • [25] AMPUTATION OF THE LITTLE FINGER
    HOGH, J
    HOOPER, G
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 1988, 107 (05) : 269 - 272
  • [26] Notification on the amputation of a finger
    zur Verth, M
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1939, 65 : 1795 - 1797
  • [27] WHEN TO REPLANT A FINGERTIP AFTER ITS COMPLETE AMPUTATION
    ELSAHY, NI
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1977, 60 (01) : 14 - 21
  • [28] Double Fillet Flaps from a Single Digit for Adjacent Finger Salvage
    Berner, Juan Enrique
    Pickford, Mark
    JOURNAL OF HAND AND MICROSURGERY, 2020, 12 (01) : 67 - 68
  • [29] Reoperation After Combined Injury of the Index Finger: Repair Versus Immediate Amputation
    Wilkens, Suzanne C.
    Claessen, Femke M. A. P.
    Ogink, Paul T.
    Moradi, Ali
    Ring, David
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2016, 41 (03): : 436 - +
  • [30] EQUINE COLIC AND AMPUTATION OF BOVINE DIGIT
    DAVIES, JV
    KING, JN
    VETERINARY RECORD, 1987, 120 (18) : 443 - 444