When and why do artifact emojis lead to backfire effects on consumer response?

被引:1
|
作者
Kim, Claire Heeryung [1 ,4 ]
Forcum, Lura [2 ]
Giebelhausen, Michael [3 ]
机构
[1] Roosevelt Univ, Heller Coll Business, Dept Mkt, Chicago, IL USA
[2] State Policy Network, Arlington, VA USA
[3] Clemson Univ, William O & Ann Powers Coll Business, Dept Mkt, Clemson, SC USA
[4] Roosevelt Univ, Heller Coll Business, Dept Mkt, 430 S Michigan Ave, Chicago, IL 60605 USA
关键词
PERSUASION KNOWLEDGE; EMOTICONS; ONLINE; COMMUNICATION; SKEPTICISM; METAPHORS; PICTURES; EMOTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1002/cb.2323
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In online settings, firms have rapidly adopted emojis in their marketing messages. Thus, marketing research and practice have begun to examine emojis in recent years. However, while prior work has examined the impact of emojis that depict facial expressions and body movements (i.e., kinesic emojis), research into emojis that represent objects (i.e., artifact emojis) is scarce. The present research fills this void by showing that artifact emojis can negatively influence consumer response. Specifically, the authors demonstrate that the presence (vs. absence) of artifact emojis in broadcast marketing messages increases skepticism, as consumers infer the brand has ulterior motives for emoji use. Subsequently, they show decreased response to the brand's broadcast message on multiple marketing outcomes. Moderators that strengthen or weaken the observed effects are also examined: when emojis are less (vs. more) relevant to the text and when artifact emojis substitute (vs. supplement) the word they represent.
引用
收藏
页码:2042 / 2054
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条