Fisheries local action groups, small-scale fisheries and territorial development

被引:2
|
作者
Phillipson, Jeremy [1 ]
Salmi, Pekka [2 ]
Linke, Sebastian [3 ]
Svels, Kristina [2 ]
Budzich-Tabor, Urszula [4 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Ctr Rural Econ, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, England
[2] Nat Resources Inst Finland, Turku, Finland
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Sch Global Studies, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] FAMENET European Fisheries & Aquaculture Monitorin, Brussels, Belgium
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
blue growth; community-led local development (CLLD); FLAG; LEADER; small-scale fisheries; territorial development; RURAL-DEVELOPMENT; LEADER;
D O I
10.1111/soru.12478
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
In comparison to the wealth of critical evaluation of LEADER (i.e., Liaison entre actions de developpement de l'economie rurale), there has been no consolidated attempt to reflect on the contribution of Fisheries Local Action Groups (FLAGs), now entering their third EU programming period. Set up in the image of LEADER, and a novel governance instrument within the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), FLAGs aim to activate local responses that build resilience and adaptability within the fisheries sector and wider communities. In addition to introducing the accompanying articles that make up this special issue of Sociologia Ruralis, our article gives an account of the emergence of community-led local development (CLLD) in fisheries and the attributes that have characterised the application of the LEADER approach within a fisheries-territorial development context. In many cases, FLAGs have led to improved relationships between the small-scale fishing sector and wider local social and economic networks, helping the sector reimagine its role within local economies. Yet outcomes vary as the FLAG approach has been applied across different cultural and institutional settings. There are indications that the system is becoming enveloped by wider priorities of coastal development and blue growth. Yet FLAGs may well provide a successful test case for widening participation in the CFP and upscaling integration of the fishing industry within local and regional economies. For CLLD in general, they are a reminder of the value of a differentiated CLLD approach tailored to different sectoral-territorial contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 414
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Thinking big on small-scale fisheries
    Chuenpagdee, Ratana
    ECOSYSTEM APPROACHES TO FISHERIES: A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE, 2011, : 226 - 240
  • [22] Transforming the governance of small-scale fisheries
    Chuenpagdee, Ratana
    Jentoft, Svein
    MARITIME STUDIES, 2018, 17 (01) : 101 - 115
  • [23] Rethinking small-scale fisheries compliance
    Hauck, Maria
    MARINE POLICY, 2008, 32 (04) : 635 - 642
  • [24] A NOTE ABOUT SMALL-SCALE FISHERIES
    CLAIREAUX, H
    DISCOVERY AND INNOVATION, 1992, 4 (01): : 30 - 32
  • [25] SMALL-SCALE COASTAL FISHERIES AND COMANAGEMENT
    KUPERAN, K
    ABDULLAH, NMR
    MARINE POLICY, 1994, 18 (04) : 306 - 313
  • [26] Managing small-scale fisheries in Colombia
    Saavedra-Díaz L.M.
    Pomeroy R.
    Rosenberg A.A.
    Maritime Studies, 15 (1)
  • [27] Aligning the sustainable development goals to the small-scale fisheries guidelines: A case for EU fisheries governance
    Said, Alicia
    Chuenpagdee, Ratana
    MARINE POLICY, 2019, 107
  • [28] Fisheries Improvement Projects and small-scale fisheries: The need for a modified approach
    Barr, Rhona
    Bruner, Aaron
    Edwards, Scott
    MARINE POLICY, 2019, 105 : 109 - 115
  • [29] Sustainable development outcomes of livelihood diversification in small-scale fisheries
    Roscher, Matthew B.
    Allison, Edward H.
    Mills, David J.
    Eriksson, Hampus
    Hellebrandt, Denis
    Andrew, Neil L.
    FISH AND FISHERIES, 2022, 23 (04) : 910 - 925
  • [30] SOCIOECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS IN SMALL-SCALE MARINE FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT
    YAP, CL
    AGRICULTURAL ADMINISTRATION, 1980, 8 (01): : 65 - 77