Complete Revascularization Strategies in Women and Men With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Multivessel Disease

被引:1
|
作者
Elscot, Jacob J. [1 ]
Kakar, Hala [1 ]
Dekker, Wijnand K. den [1 ]
Bennett, Johan [2 ]
Sabate, Manel [3 ]
Esposito, Giovanni [4 ]
Daemen, Joost [1 ]
Boersma, Eric [1 ]
Mieghem, Nicolas M. Van [1 ]
Diletti, Roberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC Cardiovasc Inst, Thorax Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Cardiovasc Inst, Intervent Cardiol Dept, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Adv Biomed Sci, Naples, Italy
来源
关键词
acute coronary syndrome; gender; multivessel PCI; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; CLINICAL-TRIALS; SEX-DIFFERENCES; INTERVENTION; OUTCOMES; LESION; PARTICIPATION; STEMI;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.12.044
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This prespecified substudy of the randomized Percutaneous Complete Revascularization Strategies Using Sirolimus Eluting Biodegradable Polymer Coated Stents in Patients Presenting With Acute Coronary Syndromes and Multivessel Disease (BIOVASC) trial aimed to compare immediate complete revascularization (ICR) and staged complete revascularization (SCR) in patients with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel disease, stratified by gender. The primary end point consisted of a composite of all -cause mortality, myocardial infarction, unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization, and cerebrovascular events at 1 -year follow-up. The secondary end points included the individual components of the primary composite and major bleedings. We used Cox regression models to relate randomized treatment with study end points. We evaluated the multiplicative and additive interactions between gender and randomized treatment. The BIOVASC trial enrolled 338 women and 1,187 men. Women were older than men (median age 71.6 vs 63.7 years, p <0.001) and had a higher prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (10.1% vs 5.6%, p = 0.003), renal insufficiency (7.7% vs 4.4%, p = 0.015), and hypertension (60.4% vs 51.7%, p = 0.005). In women, the composite primary outcome occurred in 7.3% versus 12.9% (hazard ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.26 to 1.08) in patients randomly allocated to ICR and SCR, respectively, and in men in 7.7% versus 8.4% (hazard ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 1.34), with no evidence of a differential effect (interaction p(multiplicative) = 0.20, p(additive) = 0.87). No evidence of heterogeneity between women and men was found when comparing ICR with SCR in terms of the secondary outcomes. In conclusion, no differential treatment effect was found when comparing ICR versus SCR in women or men presenting with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel disease. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
引用
下载
收藏
页码:25 / 32
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Complete Versus Incomplete Coronary Revascularization of Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
    Sandoval Y.
    Brilakis E.S.
    Canoniero M.
    Yannopoulos D.
    Garcia S.
    Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2015, 17 (3)
  • [22] Outcomes of Women and Men With Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated With and Without Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization
    Udell, Jacob A.
    Koh, Maria
    Qiu, Feng
    Austin, Peter C.
    Wijeysundera, Harindra C.
    Bagai, Akshay
    Yan, Andrew T.
    Goodman, Shaun G.
    Tu, Jack V.
    Ko, Dennis T.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2017, 6 (01):
  • [23] Complete Revascularization in Patients With STEMI and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Is It Beneficial?
    Voudris, Konstantinos V.
    Feldman, Dmitriy N.
    CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 23 (02)
  • [24] Complete Revascularization in Patients With STEMI and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Is It Beneficial?
    Konstantinos V. Voudris
    Dmitriy N. Feldman
    Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2021, 23 (2)
  • [25] Complete Revascularization in Acute and Chronic Coronary Syndrome
    Ilardi, Federica
    Ferrone, Marco
    Avvedimento, Marisa
    Servillo, Giuseppe
    Gargiulo, Giuseppe
    CARDIOLOGY CLINICS, 2020, 38 (04) : 491 - 505
  • [26] Complete revascularization in patients with multivessel disease
    Gregory B. Lim
    Nature Reviews Cardiology, 2015, 12 (10) : 560 - 560
  • [27] Revascularization Strategies in Patients Presenting With NonST- Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes and Multivessel Coronary Disease
    Elscot, Jacob
    Scarparo, Paola
    Kakar, Hala
    Forero, Maria Tovar
    Cummins, Paul
    den Dekker, Wijnand
    Wilschut, Jeroen
    Kardys, Isabella
    Daemen, Joost
    Zijlstra, Felix
    van Mieghem, Nicolas
    Diletti, Roberto
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 80 (12) : B4 - B5
  • [28] Impact of complete revascularization for acute myocardial infarction with multivessel coronary artery disease in diabetes mellitus patients
    Kang, J.
    Park, K. W.
    Rhee, T. M.
    Lee, H. S.
    Ki, Y. J.
    Han, J. K.
    Yang, H. M.
    Kang, H. J.
    Koo, B. K.
    Kim, H. S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 : 1482 - 1482
  • [29] Complete versus culprit-vessel only revascularization for patients with acute coronary syndromes and multivessel disease
    Ferreira, J.
    Monteiro, S.
    Baptista, R.
    Goncalves, F.
    Monteiro, P.
    Goncalves, L.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 40 : 1892 - 1892
  • [30] Timing of revascularization in acute coronary syndrome with multivessel disease: Do we need to hurry up??
    Mangieri, Antonio
    Gitto, Mauro
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2024, 60 : 9 - 10