Biomechanical Analysis of Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages With Various Elastic Moduli in Osteoporotic and Non-osteoporotic Lumbar Spine: A Finite Element Analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Zou, Da [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yue, Lihao [4 ]
Fan, Zheyu [4 ]
Zhao, Yi [4 ]
Leng, Huijie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sun, Zhuoran [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Weishi [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ Third Hosp, Orthopaed Dept, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Educ, Engn Res Ctr Bone & Joint Precis Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Key Lab Spinal Dis Res, Orthopaed Dept, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Univ, Orthopaed Dept, Hlth Sci Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Peking Univ Third Hosp, Orthopaed Dept, 49 North Garden Rd, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
osteoporosis; cage; finite element analysis; elastic modulus; endplate; BONE-MINERAL DENSITY; INTERVERTEBRAL CAGES; DISC DEGENERATION; CORTICAL SHELL; SUBSIDENCE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1177/21925682231166612
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study design Finite element analysis (FEA). Objective This study aimed to explore the effects of cage elastic modulus (Cage-E) on the endplate stress in different bone conditions: osteoporosis (OP) and non-osteoporosis (non-OP). We also explored the correlation between endplate thickness and endplate stress. Method The FEA models of L4-L5 with lumbar interbody fusion were designed to access the effects of Cage-E on the endplate stress in different bone conditions. Two groups of the Young's moduli of bony structure were assigned to simulate the conditions of OP and non-OP, and the bony endplates were analyzed in 2 kinds of thicknesses: .5 mm and 1.0 mm, with the insertion of cages with different Young's moduli including .5, 1.5, 3, 5, 10, and 20 GPa. After model validation, an axial compressive load of 400 N and a flexion/extension moment of 7.5Nm was performed on the superior surface of L4 vertebral body in order to analyze the distribution of stress. Result The maximum Von Mises stress in the endplates increased by up to 100% in the OP model compared with non-OP model under the same condition of cage-E and endplate thickness. In both OP and non-OP models, the maximum endplate stress decreased as the cage-E decreased, but the maximum stress in the lumbar posterior fixation increased as the cage-E decreased. Thinner endplate thickness was associated with increased endplate stress. Conclusion The endplate stress is higher in osteoporotic bone than non-osteoporotic bone, which explains part of the mechanism of OP-related cage subsidence. It is reasonable to reduce the endplate stress by reducing the cage-E, but we should balance the risk of fixation failure. Endplate thickness is also important when evaluating the cage subsidence risk.
引用
收藏
页码:2053 / 2061
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biomechanical effects of metastasis in the osteoporotic lumbar spine: A Finite Element Analysis
    Giuseppe Salvatore
    Alessandra Berton
    Hugo Giambini
    Mauro Ciuffreda
    Pino Florio
    Umile Giuseppe Longo
    Vincenzo Denaro
    Andrew Thoreson
    Kai-Nan An
    [J]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 19
  • [2] Biomechanical effects of metastasis in the osteoporotic lumbar spine: A Finite Element Analysis
    Salvatore, Giuseppe
    Berton, Alessandra
    Giambini, Hugo
    Ciuffreda, Mauro
    Florio, Pino
    Longo, Umile Giuseppe
    Denaro, Vincenzo
    Thoreson, Andrew
    An, Kai-Nan
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2018, 19
  • [3] Biomechanical analysis of lumbar interbody fusion cages with various lordotic angles: a finite element study
    Zhang, Zhenjun
    Fogel, Guy R.
    Liao, Zhenhua
    Sun, Yitao
    Liu, Weiqiang
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 21 (03) : 247 - 254
  • [4] Biomechanical assessment of different transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion constructs in normal and osteoporotic condition: a finite element analysis
    Liu, Chen
    Zhao, Mengmeng
    Zhang, Wencan
    Wang, Chongyi
    Hu, Bingtao
    Wang, Kaibin
    Xu, Wanlong
    Li, Le
    Si, Haipeng
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 24 (06): : 1121 - 1131
  • [5] Biomechanical Comparison of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion by Finite Element Analysis
    Xu, Hao
    Tang, Hao
    Guan, Xuemei
    Jiang, Fugui
    Xu, Neng
    Ju, Wen
    Zhu, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Xiaojian
    Zhang, Qiulin
    Li, Ming
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 72 : 21 - 26
  • [6] Biomechanical Analysis of Porous Additive Manufactured Cages for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis
    Zhang, Zhenjun
    Li, Hui
    Fogel, Guy R.
    Liao, Zhenhua
    Li, Yang
    Liu, Weiqiang
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 111 : E581 - E591
  • [7] Does Cage Position Affect the Risk of Cage Subsidence After Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Osteoporotic Lumbar Spine: A Finite Element Analysis
    Qin, Yichuan
    Zhao, Bin
    Yuan, Jie
    Xu, Chaojian
    Su, Junqiang
    Hao, Jiaqi
    Lv, Jie
    Wang, Yongfeng
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 161 : E220 - E228
  • [8] Biomechanical role of cement augmentation in the vibration characteristics of the osteoporotic lumbar spine after lumbar interbody fusion
    Wang, Qing-Dong
    Guo, Li-Xin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 33 (06)
  • [9] Biomechanical role of cement augmentation in the vibration characteristics of the osteoporotic lumbar spine after lumbar interbody fusion
    Qing-Dong Wang
    Li-Xin Guo
    [J]. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 33
  • [10] Biomechanical analysis of cages for posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Fantigrossi, Alfonso
    Galbusera, Fabio
    Raimondi, Manuela Teresa
    Sassi, Marco
    Fornari, Maurizio
    [J]. MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2007, 29 (01) : 101 - 109