Quantum 3D FFT in Tomography

被引:0
|
作者
Koukiou, Georgia [1 ]
Anastassopoulos, Vassilis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Patras, Phys Dept, Elect Lab, Patras 26504, Greece
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 06期
关键词
Quantum Fourier Transform; quantum circuits; tomography; radon transform; quantum 3D back projection; ALGORITHMS;
D O I
10.3390/app13064009
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The Radon transform constitutes the conventional tool for tomosynthesis, i.e., the composition of cross-sections of an object from its projections. It is actually a version of the Fourier Transform, which is accompanied by the appropriate digital high pass filters for correct distribution of energy among the reconstructed frequency components. The Radon transform and its inverse are employed in their 2D and 3D versions, respectively, and the whole procedure is verified by the a priori known cross-sections to be reconstructed (known fandom). Usually, 3D medical image cubes, which are to be reconstructed, require powerful computational tools since the 2D projections are of high-resolution containing millions of pixels. Although the 3D FFT is very fast, the large number of projections will result in a 3D spectrum of very large dimensions. Inverting this spectrum with the inverse 3D FFT is extremely time consuming. In this work, the implementation of the 2D Radon transform using the 2D Quantum Fourier Transform is analytically presented. Simultaneously, its inverse version is realized by means of the Quantum inverse 3D FFT. For this purpose, a review of the necessary quantum computational units is presented for the implementation of the quantum 3D FFT and simultaneously simple examples of tomosynthesis are given by means of the quantum version of the 2D Radon transform and its inverse 3D counterpart. The whole procedure of the quantum tomosynthesis is analytically described.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of Glenoid Dimensions Between 3D Computed Tomography and 3D Printing
    Yiannakopoulos, Christos
    Vlastos, Iakovos
    Koutserimpas, Christos
    Gianzina, Elina
    Dellis, Spilios
    Kalinterakis, Georgios
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [22] IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ETAR METHOD FOR 3D INHOMOGENEITY CORRECTION USING FFT
    YU, CX
    WONG, JW
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 20 (03) : 627 - 632
  • [23] Performance measurements of the 3D FFT on the Blue Gene/L supercomputer
    Eleftheriou, M
    Fitch, B
    Rayshubskiy, A
    Ward, TJC
    Germain, R
    [J]. EURO-PAR 2005 PARALLEL PROCESSING, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3648 : 795 - 803
  • [24] 3D quantum Hall effect
    Hai-Zhou Lu
    [J]. National Science Review, 2019, 6 (02) : 208 - 210
  • [25] Quantum gases trapped in 3D
    不详
    [J]. PHYSICS WORLD, 2006, 19 (06) : 4 - 4
  • [26] 3D Integration for Quantum Computing
    Ishihara, Ryoichi
    [J]. 2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL 3D SYSTEMS INTEGRATION CONFERENCE, 3DIC, 2023,
  • [27] Compact 3D quantum memory
    Xie, Edwar
    Deppe, Frank
    Renger, Michael
    Repp, Daniel
    Eder, Peter
    Fischer, Michael
    Goetz, Jan
    Pogorzalek, Stefan
    Fedorov, Kirill G.
    Marx, Achim
    Gross, Rudolf
    [J]. APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 2018, 112 (20)
  • [28] 3D topological quantum computing
    Asselmeyer-Maluga, Torsten
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUANTUM INFORMATION, 2021, 19 (04)
  • [29] 3D quantum ghost imaging
    Pitsch, Carsten
    Walter, Dominik
    Gasparini, Leonardo
    Buersing, Helge
    Eichhorn, Marc
    [J]. APPLIED OPTICS, 2023, 62 (23) : 6275 - 6281
  • [30] 3D quantum Hall effect
    Lu, Hai-Zhou
    [J]. NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2019, 6 (02) : 208 - U46