Technical Performance Comparison between U-Shaped and Deep Borehole Heat Exchangers

被引:2
|
作者
Alimonti, Claudio [1 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Chem Engn Mat Environm, Via Eudossiana 18, I-00184 Rome, Italy
关键词
geothermal energy; closed-loop systems; deep borehole heat exchanger; U-loop; GEOTHERMAL-ENERGY EXTRACTION; CAMPI FLEGREI; CALDERAS; UNREST; WELL; CO2;
D O I
10.3390/en16031351
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The geothermal industry is fronted by a fundamental decade to grow and become an energy supplier in transitioning to a sustainable energy system. The introduction of Closed-Loop Geothermal energy systems (CLG) can overcome the negative social response and increase the attractiveness of geothermal developments. The present work aims to investigate and compare the performance of CLG systems. For the comparison, the case study of Campi Flegrei was chosen. The maximum depth was fixed at 2000 m, and the two configurations were set up to analyse the performance and evaluate the best operational configuration. Both CLG configurations showed decay in the output temperature of the working fluid during the production time. For a U-shaped design, it is possible to find a working condition that allows constant thermal power over time. The DBHE specific power was always more significant, up to 350 kW/m, compared to the U-shaped, which attained a maximum of 300 W/m (15%). The comparison with Beckers et al. analysis highlights the similarity of our results with their base case. The consideration of the CLG system's length is related to the heat exchange and investment costs. For longer exchangers, there are higher investments and lower specific power.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Analytical model of heat transfer of U-shaped borehole heat exchanger under convolution theory and its optimal heat extraction analysis
    Wang, Xue
    Bao, Lingling
    Jin, Pengfei
    Zhu, Yuliang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES, 2023, 193
  • [42] Simulation of heat transfer performance using middle-deep coaxial borehole heat exchangers by FEFLOW
    Kang Wen-kai
    Liu Feng
    Yang Fei-fan
    Wang Hua-jun
    JOURNAL OF GROUNDWATER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 8 (04): : 315 - 327
  • [43] Numerical research on the heat transfer model and performance of deep borehole heat exchangers combined with geothermal wells
    Ma, Jiuchen
    Yang, Jie
    Yi, Feiyu
    Ren, Jiawei
    Lv, Linhai
    Cui, Afeng
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 214
  • [44] Experimental study on heat transfer performance of double U-shaped buried tube heat exchanger
    Li L.
    Zhang W.
    Xu S.
    Zhao Y.
    Dang D.
    Wang Q.
    Gou L.
    Lei Y.
    Meitiandizhi Yu Kantan/Coal Geology and Exploration, 2023, 51 (04): : 125 - 132
  • [45] U-Tube Diameter Dependence of Heat Output for Borehole Heat Exchangers
    Dai, Chuanshan
    Wang, Shuai
    Qin, Weixing
    PROGRESS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-4, 2012, 170-173 : 2613 - +
  • [46] Thermal performance analysis of multiple borehole heat exchangers
    Gultekin, Ahmet
    Aydin, Murat
    Sisman, Altug
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 122 : 544 - 551
  • [47] AROUSAL AND PERFORMANCE - AN INVERTED U-SHAPED RELATIONSHIP
    APPEL, MA
    HOLROYD, KA
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1980, 17 (03) : 302 - 302
  • [48] Improving the thermal performance of coaxial borehole heat exchangers
    Zanchini, E.
    Lazzari, S.
    Priarone, A.
    ENERGY, 2010, 35 (02) : 657 - 666
  • [49] Feasibility of coaxial deep borehole heat exchangers in southern California
    Chen, Haohua
    Tomac, Ingrid
    Geothermal Energy, 2024, 12 (01)
  • [50] Numerical Analysis of Enhanced Conductive Deep Borehole Heat Exchangers
    Renaud, Theo
    Pan, Lehua
    Doran, Hannah
    Falcone, Gioia
    Verdin, Patrick G.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (12)