Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment for catalytic fast pyrolysis of mixed plastic waste

被引:24
|
作者
Yadav, Geetanjali [1 ,2 ]
Singh, Avantika [1 ,2 ]
Dutta, Abhijit [1 ]
Uekert, Taylor [2 ,3 ]
DesVeaux, Jason S. [1 ,2 ]
Nicholson, Scott R. [2 ,3 ]
Tan, Eric C. D. [1 ]
Mukarakate, Calvin [1 ]
Schaidle, Joshua A. [1 ]
Wrasman, Cody J. [1 ]
Carpenter, Alberta C. [2 ,3 ]
Baldwin, Robert M. [2 ,4 ]
Roman-Leshkov, Yuriy [2 ,5 ]
Beckham, Gregg T. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Catalyt Carbon Transformat & Scale Up Ctr, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[2] BOTTLE Consortium, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[3] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Strateg Energy Anal Ctr, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[4] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Renewable Resources & Enabling Sci Ctr, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[5] MIT, Dept Chem Engn, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
关键词
HIGH-DENSITY POLYETHYLENE; CONICAL SPOUTED BED; FLUIDIZED-BED; BTX AROMATICS; LIGHT OLEFINS; DEGRADATION; TEMPERATURE; STEAM; FUELS; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1039/d3ee00749a
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Pyrolysis of waste plastics has gained interest as a candidate chemical recycling technology. To examine the potential of this approach, we conducted a techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) of a conceptual catalytic fast pyrolysis (CFP) facility that converts 240 metric tons/day of mixed plastic waste. The modeled base case predicts the minimum selling price (MSP) of a benzene, toluene, and xylenes (BTX) mixture at $1.07 per kg when co-products are sold at their average market prices. We predict that the aromatic product stream can be cost-competitive with virgin BTX mixtures ($0.68/kg) if the mixed waste plastics are available for less than $0.10/kg or if crude oil prices exceed $60/barrel. Moreover, we estimate that CFP-based conversion of waste plastics can reduce the total supply chain energy use by 24% but with a 2.4-fold increase in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions per kilogram of BTX, relative to incumbent manufacturing process. Sensitivity analysis highlights that feedstock cost, co-product selling prices, capital cost for product separations, and operating costs are key cost drivers. Further, we examine three additional CFP processes that differ in product composition, namely naphtha, and a case where the products are rich in either C-2-C-4 olefins or BTX aromatic hydrocarbons. Whereas the MSP of naphtha ($2.18/kg) is similar to 4-fold higher than virgin naphtha, both the olefin-rich and aromatics-rich product cases exhibit a potential reduction in MSP up to 40%, with a 21%-45% reduction in total supply chain energy and 2.2-3.8-fold increase in GHG emissions relative to incumbent manufacturing processes. LCA predicts that the CFP process exhibits lower fossil fuel depletion than virgin manufacturing across all cases as well as lower acidification, ozone depletion, and smog formation for select cases, but high utility and feedstock preparation requirements result in poorer performance across other metrics. Overall, this study highlights important process parameters for improving CFP of mixed waste plastics from economic and environmental perspectives.
引用
收藏
页码:3638 / 3653
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment of mixed plastic waste gasification for production of methanol and hydrogen
    Afzal, Shaik
    Singh, Avantika
    Nicholson, Scott R.
    Uekert, Taylor
    DesVeaux, Jason S.
    Tan, Eric C. D.
    Dutta, Abhijit
    Carpenter, Alberta C.
    Baldwin, Robert M.
    Beckham, Gregg T.
    [J]. GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2023, 25 (13) : 5068 - 5085
  • [2] Conversion of plastic waste into high-value lubricants: techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment
    Cappello, Vincenzo
    Sun, Pingping
    Zang, Guiyan
    Kumar, Shishir
    Hackler, Ryan
    Delgado, Hernan E.
    Elgowainy, Amgad
    Delferro, Massimiliano
    Krause, Theodore
    [J]. GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2022, 24 (16) : 6306 - 6318
  • [3] Techno-economic evaluation of high temperature pyrolysis processes for mixed plastic waste
    Westerhout, RWJ
    Van Koningsbruggen, MP
    Van der Ham, AGJ
    Kuipers, JAM
    Van Swaaij, WPM
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 1998, 76 (A3): : 427 - 439
  • [4] Techno-economic evaluation of high temperature pyrolysis processes for mixed plastic waste
    Westerhout, R.W.J.
    van Koningsbruggen, M.P.
    van der Ham, A.G.J.
    Kuipers, J.A.M.
    van Swaaij, W.P.M.
    [J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 1998, 76 (A3): : 427 - 439
  • [5] Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Assessment of Pyrolysis of Unsegregated Urban Municipal Solid Waste in India
    Chhabra, Vibhuti
    Parashar, Anand
    Shastri, Yogendra
    Bhattacharya, Sankar
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2021, 60 (03) : 1473 - 1482
  • [6] Techno-economic assessment of the pyrolysis of rubber waste
    Laghezza, Maddalena
    Papari, Sadegh
    Fiore, Silvia
    Berruti, Franco
    [J]. ENERGY, 2023, 278
  • [7] Pyrolysis of plastic waste for production of heavy fuel substitute: A techno-economic assessment
    Fivga, Antzela
    Dimitriou, Ioanna
    [J]. ENERGY, 2018, 149 : 865 - 874
  • [8] Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment of a biorefinery utilizing reductive catalytic fractionation
    Bartling, Andrew W.
    Stone, Michael L.
    Hanes, Rebecca J.
    Bhatt, Arpit
    Zhang, Yimin
    Biddy, Mary J.
    Davis, Ryan
    Kruger, Jacob S.
    Thornburg, Nicholas E.
    Luterbacher, Jeremy S.
    Rinaldi, Roberto
    Samec, Joseph S. M.
    Sels, Bert F.
    Roman-Leshkov, Yuriy
    Beckham, Gregg T.
    [J]. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2021, 14 (08) : 4147 - 4168
  • [9] Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment of microwave co-pyrolysis of food waste and low-density polyethylene
    Neha, Shukla
    Ramesh, Kondragunta Prasanna Kumar
    Remya, Neelancherry
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2022, 52
  • [10] Techno-economic assessment of the effect of torrefaction on fast pyrolysis of pine
    Winjobi, Olumide
    Shonnard, David R.
    Bar-Ziv, Ezra
    Zhou, Wen
    [J]. BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2016, 10 (02): : 117 - 128