Public university research engagement contradictions in a commercialisation higher education world

被引:10
|
作者
Parker, Lee D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Adam Smith Business Sch, Glasgow, Scotland
[2] RMIT Univ, Dept Accounting, Melbourne, Australia
[3] 100 Gover St, North Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia
关键词
commercialisation; neoliberalism; research engagement; research practice gap; universities; RESEARCH-PRACTICE GAP; ACCOUNTING RESEARCH; PERFORMANCE-MEASUREMENT; BUSINESS SCHOOLS; ACADEMIC WORK; MANAGEMENT; AUSTRALIA; PERFORMATIVITY; ACCOUNTABILITY; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1111/faam.12341
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper aims to critically assess the impact of public university commercialisation on research engagement and practice relevance. Recent decades have seen dramatic changes in university environments, identities and missions, as well as in government and private sector funding and involvement. As increasingly commercialised and corporatised organisations, universities have increasingly mimicked private sector hierarchical organisation structures, professionally managed and subject to performance management via proliferating management control systems. From accumulated prior research, this paper finds university research now primarily conducted for the private rather than public good, researchers being subject to and tailoring their endeavors to conform with proliferating metrics focused university management control systems. External engagement appears as a university impression management strategy, while internally, researchers are still compelled to pursue a contradictory focus on high-status self-referential journal publication venues. This contradictory environment is found to have produced an increasing distance between university research and professional practice and between research and professional communities.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 33
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] World Bank okays public interest in higher education
    Post D.
    Clipper L.
    Enkhbaatar D.
    Manning A.
    Riley T.
    Zaman H.
    Higher Education, 2004, 48 (2) : 213 - 229
  • [42] Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations
    Perkmann, Markus
    Tartari, Valentina
    McKelvey, Maureen
    Autio, Erkko
    Brostrom, Anders
    D'Este, Pablo
    Fini, Riccardo
    Geuna, Aldo
    Grimaldi, Rosa
    Hughes, Alan
    Krabel, Stefan
    Kitson, Michael
    Llerena, Patrick
    Lissoni, Franceso
    Salter, Ammon
    Sobrero, Maurizio
    RESEARCH POLICY, 2013, 42 (02) : 423 - 442
  • [43] Stakeholder Engagement in Higher Education: State of the Art and Research Agenda
    Crocco, Edoardo
    Giacosa, Elisa
    Culasso, Francesca
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2024, 71 : 13457 - 13468
  • [44] Student engagement research in higher education: questioning an academic orthodoxy
    Zepke, Nick
    TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2014, 19 (06) : 697 - 708
  • [45] Public Engagement, Historians and Higher Education: A Retrospective UK Case Study
    Williamson, Fiona
    PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES, 2015, 23 (03): : 567 - 581
  • [46] Assumptions and contradictions shape public engagement on climate change
    Murunga, Michael
    Macleod, Catriona
    Pecl, Gretta
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2024, 14 (02) : 126 - 133
  • [47] Assumptions and contradictions shape public engagement on climate change
    Michael Murunga
    Catriona Macleod
    Gretta Pecl
    Nature Climate Change, 2024, 14 : 126 - 133
  • [48] HIGHER EDUCATION Turmoil imperils research university in Andes
    Mega, Emiliano Rodriguez
    SCIENCE, 2017, 357 (6349) : 340 - 341
  • [49] The research commercialisation agenda: a concerning development for public health research
    Wardle, Jon L.
    Baum, Fran E.
    Fisher, Matthew
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 43 (05) : 407 - 409
  • [50] BLACK STUDENTS IN THE PUBLIC UNIVERSITY: TENSIONS AND CHALLENGES IN HIGHER EDUCATION
    Zonta, Graziele Aline
    Zanella, Andrea Vieira
    REVISTA PRAXIS EDUCACIONAL, 2020, 16 (41): : 591 - 613