Public university research engagement contradictions in a commercialisation higher education world
被引:10
|
作者:
Parker, Lee D.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Glasgow, Adam Smith Business Sch, Glasgow, Scotland
RMIT Univ, Dept Accounting, Melbourne, Australia
100 Gover St, North Adelaide, SA 5006, AustraliaUniv Glasgow, Adam Smith Business Sch, Glasgow, Scotland
Parker, Lee D.
[1
,2
,3
]
机构:
[1] Univ Glasgow, Adam Smith Business Sch, Glasgow, Scotland
[2] RMIT Univ, Dept Accounting, Melbourne, Australia
[3] 100 Gover St, North Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia
commercialisation;
neoliberalism;
research engagement;
research practice gap;
universities;
RESEARCH-PRACTICE GAP;
ACCOUNTING RESEARCH;
PERFORMANCE-MEASUREMENT;
BUSINESS SCHOOLS;
ACADEMIC WORK;
MANAGEMENT;
AUSTRALIA;
PERFORMATIVITY;
ACCOUNTABILITY;
RESPONSES;
D O I:
10.1111/faam.12341
中图分类号:
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号:
0202 ;
摘要:
This paper aims to critically assess the impact of public university commercialisation on research engagement and practice relevance. Recent decades have seen dramatic changes in university environments, identities and missions, as well as in government and private sector funding and involvement. As increasingly commercialised and corporatised organisations, universities have increasingly mimicked private sector hierarchical organisation structures, professionally managed and subject to performance management via proliferating management control systems. From accumulated prior research, this paper finds university research now primarily conducted for the private rather than public good, researchers being subject to and tailoring their endeavors to conform with proliferating metrics focused university management control systems. External engagement appears as a university impression management strategy, while internally, researchers are still compelled to pursue a contradictory focus on high-status self-referential journal publication venues. This contradictory environment is found to have produced an increasing distance between university research and professional practice and between research and professional communities.