Estimation of Excitation Current of a Synchronous Machine Using Machine Learning Methods

被引:2
|
作者
Glucina, Matko [1 ]
Andelic, Nikola [2 ]
Lorencin, Ivan [2 ]
Car, Zlatan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rijeka, Trg Brace Mazuranica 10, Rijeka 51000, Croatia
[2] Univ Rijeka, Fac Engn, Vukovarska 58, Rijeka 51000, Croatia
关键词
artificial intelligence algorithms; excitation current; regression algorithms; synchronous machine; MAGNET TEMPERATURE ESTIMATION; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; MOTORS; OPTIMIZATION; EFFICIENCY; IDENTIFICATION; REPRESENTATION; REGRESSION; DRIVE;
D O I
10.3390/computers12010001
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
A synchronous machine is an electro-mechanical converter consisting of a stator and a rotor. The stator is the stationary part of a synchronous machine that is made of phase-shifted armature windings in which voltage is generated and the rotor is the rotating part made using permanent magnets or electromagnets. The excitation current is a significant parameter of the synchronous machine, and it is of immense importance to continuously monitor possible value changes to ensure the smooth and high-quality operation of the synchronous machine itself. The purpose of this paper is to estimate the excitation current on a publicly available dataset, using the following input parameters: I-y: load current; PF: power factor; e: power factor error; and d(f): changing of excitation current of synchronous machine, using artificial intelligence algorithms. The algorithms used in this research were: k-nearest neighbors, linear, random forest, ridge, stochastic gradient descent, support vector regressor, multi-layer perceptron, and extreme gradient boost regressor, where the worst result was elasticnet, with R-2 = -0.0001, MSE = 0.0297, and MAPE = 0.1442; the best results were provided by extreme boosting regressor, with (R-2) over bar = 0.9963, (MSE) over bar = 0.0001, and (MAPE) over bar = 0.0057, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evapotranspiration Estimation Using Machine Learning Methods
    Treder, Waldemar
    Klamkowski, Krzysztof
    Wójcik, Katarzyna
    Tryngiel-Gać, Anna
    [J]. Journal of Horticultural Research, 2023, 31 (02) : 35 - 44
  • [2] Software effort estimation using machine learning methods
    Baskeles, Bilge
    Turhan, Burak
    Bener, Ayse
    [J]. 2007 22ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2007, : 208 - 213
  • [3] Machine Learning Methods for Demand Estimation
    Bajari, Patrick
    Nekipelov, Denis
    Ryan, Stephen P.
    Yang, Miaoyu
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 105 (05): : 481 - 485
  • [4] Wound Rotor Synchronous Machine Current Estimation Using a Linear Luenberger Observer
    Eull, Michael
    Parker, Max
    Preindl, Matthias
    [J]. 2022 IEEE/AIAA TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION CONFERENCE AND ELECTRIC AIRCRAFT TECHNOLOGIES SYMPOSIUM (ITEC+EATS 2022), 2022, : 427 - 432
  • [5] Stator Current Control Method of Brushless Harmonic Excitation Synchronous Machine
    Sun, Lizhi
    Yao, Fei
    Gao, Xiaolong
    [J]. 2014 IEEE TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION CONFERENCE AND EXPO (ITEC) ASIA-PACIFIC 2014, 2014,
  • [6] NOVEL FORM OF SYNCHRONOUS MACHINE EXCITATION
    WILLIAMSON, AC
    CHALMERS, BJ
    [J]. ELECTRIC MACHINES AND ELECTROMECHANICS, 1977, 1 (04): : 365 - 376
  • [7] Invertibility of hybrid excitation synchronous machine
    Kang Hui-jun
    Xie Qi-yue
    Yang Ru-shan
    [J]. Proceedings of 2006 Chinese Control and Decision Conference, 2006, : 1313 - 1316
  • [8] Risk estimation and risk prediction using machine-learning methods
    Kruppa, Jochen
    Ziegler, Andreas
    Koenig, Inke R.
    [J]. HUMAN GENETICS, 2012, 131 (10) : 1639 - 1654
  • [9] Estimation of models for cumulative infiltration of soil using machine learning methods
    Angelaki, Anastasia
    Singh Nain, Somvir
    Singh, Varun
    Sihag, Parveen
    [J]. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2021, 27 (02) : 162 - 169
  • [10] Risk estimation and risk prediction using machine-learning methods
    Jochen Kruppa
    Andreas Ziegler
    Inke R. König
    [J]. Human Genetics, 2012, 131 : 1639 - 1654