共 50 条
MANAGEMENT OF MELOIDOGYNE ARENARIA IN PEANUT PRODUCTION USING RESISTANCE OR NEMATICIDES
被引:0
|作者:
Grabau, Z. J.
[1
]
Ruiz, R. Sandoval
[1
]
Liu, C.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Florida, Entomol & Nematol Dept, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Biochem Mol Biol Entomol & Plant Pathol, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
来源:
关键词:
Arachis hypogaea;
free-living nematode;
management;
nematicide;
Meloidogyne arenaria;
Mesocriconema spp;
peanut;
peanut root-knot nematode;
resistance;
ring nematode;
ROOT-KNOT NEMATODE;
FOLIAR APPLICATIONS;
SCLEROTIUM-ROLFSII;
SOIL ECOLOGY;
REGISTRATION;
CORN;
ROTATIONS;
POPULATIONS;
BAHIAGRASS;
CULTIVARS;
D O I:
暂无
中图分类号:
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号:
071002 ;
摘要:
Peanut cultivars resistant to Meloidogyne arenaria (peanut root -knot nematode, PRKN), a major plantparasitic nematode in peanut production, are available, but assessment of modern resistant cultivars relative to nematicide application is needed. In field trials in 2021 and 2022, the PRKN-resistant cultivar TifNVHigh O/L [TifNV] was compared with a PRKN-susceptible cultivar in combination with no nematicide [UTC], fluopyram or aldicarb nematicide treatments. TifNV significantly increased peanut yield 39% and 125% relative to UTC in 2021 and 2022, respectively. TifNV also managed PRKN abundances and symptoms, including significantly reducing root system galling at harvest 80% and 99.5% relative to UTC in 2021 and 2022, respectively. Nematicide treatments did not improve yield or consistently manage PRKN abundances or root system galling. Total free-living nematode soil abundances at harvest were significantly reduced by TifNV, with 47% and 49% decrease relative to UTC in 2021 and 2022, respectively. Aldicarb and fluopyram had inconsistent negative impacts on free-living nematodes. In summary, the resistant cultivar TifNV-High O/L was highly effective and better than fluopyram or aldicarb application for managing PRKN and maintaining yield in an environment with severe PRKN pressure.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文