Robust Multiobjective Decision Making in the Acquisition of Energy Assets

被引:0
|
作者
Bambirra, Rafael [1 ,2 ]
Schiavo, Lais [3 ]
Lima, Marina [3 ]
Miranda, Giovanna [3 ]
Reis, Iolanda [4 ]
Cassemiro, Michael [4 ]
Andrade, Antonio [4 ]
Laender, Fernanda [4 ]
Silva, Rafael [5 ]
Vieira, Douglas [3 ]
Ekel, Petr [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais UFMG, Programa Posgrad Engn Eletr, BR-31270901 Belo Horizonte, Brazil
[2] ASOTECH, BR-30380002 Belo Horizonte, Brazil
[3] ENACOM, BR-31275100 Belo Horizonte, Brazil
[4] Alianca Energia, BR-30170050 Belo Horizonte, Brazil
[5] VALE, BR-34000000 Nova Lima, Brazil
[6] Pontificia Univ Catolica Minas Gerais PUC MG, Programa Posgrad Informat, BR-30535901 Belo Horizonte, Brazil
关键词
energy investments; energy trade; risk management; long-term planning; multicriteria decision making; RENEWABLE ENERGY; PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION; RISK-MANAGEMENT; ALLOCATION; INVESTOR; MARKET;
D O I
10.3390/en16166089
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In asset management for energy portfolios, quantitative methodologies are typically employed. In Brazil, the NEWAVE computational model is universally used to generate scenarios of hydraulic production and future prices, which result in revenue distributions. These distributions are then used to estimate the portfolio's revenue and assess its risk. Although this is a well-established analysis, it has some shortcomings that are not always considered. The validity of the revenue series constructed by NEWAVE, especially in long-term analysis, is a real problem for agents concerning the acquisition of assets such as power plants. Another issue is the disregard for other objectives that are important for the operationality of the management task and are often ignored, such as operational risk. To address these limitations, this work combines the areas of multicriteria decision making under uncertainty and risk management and presents a methodology for evaluating the acquisition of long-term energy assets, as well as a practical application of the proposed method. Investment alternatives are evaluated in multiple developed scenarios, so it is possible to measure how robust a given option is. By analyzing several scenarios simultaneously, a larger region of uncertainties can be covered, and therefore, decision making becomes more secure. The proposed methodology includes six objectives, designed to address a wider range of stakeholder needs. This approach is applied to an illustrative portfolio, producing results that allow for a more comprehensive understanding of decision attributes. Therefore, this work not only addresses the current limitations in the field but also adds an original contribution by considering simultaneously several scenarios and integrating multiple objectives in a robust and secure decision-making framework.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Decision making graphical tool for multiobjective optimization problems
    Blasco, X.
    Herrero, J. M.
    Sanchis, J.
    Martinez, M.
    [J]. BIO-INSPIRED MODELING OF COGNITIVE TASKS, PT 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4527 : 568 - +
  • [42] Multi-energy microgrid robust energy management with a novel decision-making strategy
    Chen, Tengpeng
    Cao, Yuhao
    Qing, Xinlin
    Zhang, Jingrui
    Sun, Yuhao
    Amaratunga, Gehan A. J.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2022, 239
  • [43] Robust municipal decision making? A pilot study of applying robust decision making in three Swedish municipalities
    Wester, Misse
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 65 (04) : 745 - 758
  • [44] Data Acquisition System for Energy Quality Monitoring in Decision-Making Network Nodes
    Grigorescu, Sorin Dan
    Cepisca, Costin
    Jula, Nicolae
    Popoviciu, Nicolae
    [J]. RECENT ADVANCES IN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2010, : 101 - +
  • [45] Holistic Design of Energy Pile Bridge Deicing System With Ontology-Based Multiobjective Decision Making
    Zhang, Peng
    Cui, Chunyi
    Li, Chaoji
    Zhang, Cheng
    Liu, Hailong
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MATERIALS, 2021, 8
  • [46] Robust Decision Making: Coping with Uncertainty
    Lempert, Robert J.
    Popper, Steven W.
    Bankes, Steven C.
    [J]. FUTURIST, 2010, 44 (01) : 47 - 48
  • [47] Robust Decision Making in a Nonlinear World
    Dougherty, Michael R.
    Thomas, Rick P.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2012, 119 (02) : 321 - 344
  • [48] Robust decision making for engineering design
    Ullman, DG
    [J]. ENGINEERING DESIGN CONFERENCE 2000: DESIGN FOR EXCELLENCE, 2000, : 39 - 50
  • [49] Supporting Strategic Decision-Making for Selection of Software Assets
    Wohlin, Claes
    Wnuk, Krzysztof
    Smite, Darja
    Franke, Ulrik
    Badampudi, Deepika
    Cicchetti, Antonio
    [J]. SOFTWARE BUSINESS, (ICSOB 2016), 2016, 240 : 1 - 15
  • [50] Community health decision-making through the assets mapping
    Pou-Marti, Narcis
    Oliveras-Casadella, Silvia
    Batlle-Amat, Pau
    del Acebo Pena, Xavier
    Estrada-Ocon, Maria
    Juvinya-Canal, Dolors
    [J]. GACETA SANITARIA, 2022, 36 (04) : 392 - 395