Robust Multiobjective Decision Making in the Acquisition of Energy Assets

被引:0
|
作者
Bambirra, Rafael [1 ,2 ]
Schiavo, Lais [3 ]
Lima, Marina [3 ]
Miranda, Giovanna [3 ]
Reis, Iolanda [4 ]
Cassemiro, Michael [4 ]
Andrade, Antonio [4 ]
Laender, Fernanda [4 ]
Silva, Rafael [5 ]
Vieira, Douglas [3 ]
Ekel, Petr [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais UFMG, Programa Posgrad Engn Eletr, BR-31270901 Belo Horizonte, Brazil
[2] ASOTECH, BR-30380002 Belo Horizonte, Brazil
[3] ENACOM, BR-31275100 Belo Horizonte, Brazil
[4] Alianca Energia, BR-30170050 Belo Horizonte, Brazil
[5] VALE, BR-34000000 Nova Lima, Brazil
[6] Pontificia Univ Catolica Minas Gerais PUC MG, Programa Posgrad Informat, BR-30535901 Belo Horizonte, Brazil
关键词
energy investments; energy trade; risk management; long-term planning; multicriteria decision making; RENEWABLE ENERGY; PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION; RISK-MANAGEMENT; ALLOCATION; INVESTOR; MARKET;
D O I
10.3390/en16166089
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In asset management for energy portfolios, quantitative methodologies are typically employed. In Brazil, the NEWAVE computational model is universally used to generate scenarios of hydraulic production and future prices, which result in revenue distributions. These distributions are then used to estimate the portfolio's revenue and assess its risk. Although this is a well-established analysis, it has some shortcomings that are not always considered. The validity of the revenue series constructed by NEWAVE, especially in long-term analysis, is a real problem for agents concerning the acquisition of assets such as power plants. Another issue is the disregard for other objectives that are important for the operationality of the management task and are often ignored, such as operational risk. To address these limitations, this work combines the areas of multicriteria decision making under uncertainty and risk management and presents a methodology for evaluating the acquisition of long-term energy assets, as well as a practical application of the proposed method. Investment alternatives are evaluated in multiple developed scenarios, so it is possible to measure how robust a given option is. By analyzing several scenarios simultaneously, a larger region of uncertainties can be covered, and therefore, decision making becomes more secure. The proposed methodology includes six objectives, designed to address a wider range of stakeholder needs. This approach is applied to an illustrative portfolio, producing results that allow for a more comprehensive understanding of decision attributes. Therefore, this work not only addresses the current limitations in the field but also adds an original contribution by considering simultaneously several scenarios and integrating multiple objectives in a robust and secure decision-making framework.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Equality Constraints in Multiobjective Robust Design Optimization: Decision Making Problem
    Rangavajhala, S.
    Mullur, A. A.
    Messac, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2009, 140 (02) : 315 - 337
  • [2] Equality Constraints in Multiobjective Robust Design Optimization: Decision Making Problem
    S. Rangavajhala
    A. A. Mullur
    A. Messac
    [J]. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 2009, 140 : 315 - 337
  • [3] Multiobjective Decision Making: the Combined Approach
    Feng JunwenSoft-Science Research Institute
    [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 1992, (02) : 57 - 65
  • [4] An interactive approach for multiobjective decision making
    Köksalan, M
    Karasakal, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2006, 57 (05) : 532 - 540
  • [5] Strategic decision making multiobjective decision analysis with spreadsheets
    Klein, JH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1998, 49 (01) : 96 - 97
  • [6] MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION-MAKING APPROACH TO ENERGY SUPPLY MIX DECISIONS IN TAIWAN
    TZENG, GH
    SHIAU, TA
    TENG, JY
    [J]. ENERGY SOURCES, 1994, 16 (03): : 301 - 316
  • [7] Heritage Assets: Decision Making in the Real World
    Goatley, Peter
    Pindham, Nina
    [J]. HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT-POLICY & PRACTICE, 2019, 10 (3-4): : 308 - 327
  • [8] Fuzzy preference relations and multiobjective decision making
    Ekel, P
    Martins, C
    Campos, C
    Neto, FS
    Palhares, R
    [J]. Soft Computing as Transdisciplinary Science and Technology, 2005, : 83 - 92
  • [9] Finding Efficient Solutions for Multiobjective Decision Making
    LI Bo(Section of MathematicsShandong Inst. of Bldg. Materials Jinan
    [J]. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 1996, (02) : 190 - 192
  • [10] Applications of intelligent multiobjective fuzzy decision making
    Ruspini, EH
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE: SOFT COMPUTING AND FUZZY-NEURO INTEGRATION WITH APPLICATIONS, 1998, 162 : 514 - 520