DNA Methylation and Prospects for Predicting the Therapeutic Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-Negative and Luminal B Breast Cancer

被引:2
|
作者
Sigin, Vladimir O. O. [1 ]
Kalinkin, Alexey I. I. [1 ]
Nikolaeva, Alexandra F. F. [1 ]
Ignatova, Ekaterina O. O. [1 ,2 ]
Kuznetsova, Ekaterina B. B. [1 ,3 ]
Chesnokova, Galina G. G. [1 ]
Litviakov, Nikolai V. V. [4 ]
Tsyganov, Matvey M. M. [4 ]
Ibragimova, Marina K. K. [4 ]
Vinogradov, Ilya I. I. [5 ,6 ]
Vinogradov, Maxim I. I. [5 ]
Vinogradov, Igor Y. Y. [6 ]
Zaletaev, Dmitry V. V. [1 ]
Nemtsova, Marina V. V. [1 ,3 ]
Kutsev, Sergey I. I. [1 ]
Tanas, Alexander S. S. [1 ]
Strelnikov, Vladimir V. V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Res Ctr Med Genet, Moscow 115522, Russia
[2] N N Blokhin Natl Med Res Ctr Oncol, Moscow 115478, Russia
[3] Sechenov Univ, I M Sechenov Moscow State Med Univ 1, Lab Med Genet, Moscow 119992, Russia
[4] Russian Acad Sci, Canc Res Inst, Tomsk Natl Res Med Ctr, Tomsk 634009, Russia
[5] Reg Clin Oncol Dispensary, Ryazan 390011, Russia
[6] Ryazan State Med Univ, Dept Pathol Anat, Ryazan 390026, Russia
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
breast cancer; DNA methylation; RRBS; MSRE-qPCR; predictive markers; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; INVOLVEMENT;
D O I
10.3390/cancers15051630
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Breast cancer (BC) is a group of diseases heterogeneous in morphology, progression, survival, and response to therapy. Although BC is among the most exhaustively studied cancers, there is still a lack of molecular markers to predict its response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Tumor development is determined by alterations not only of its genome, but of its epigenome as well. In order to identify epigenomic markers of BC NACT effectiveness, we have applied genome-wide DNA methylation screening of tumors in cohorts of NACT responders and nonresponders. Combining several of the most informative DNA methylation markers, we suggest tiny diagnostic panels that may be readily implemented in diagnostic laboratories. We also demonstrate that clinical characteristics predictive of NACT response, such as the clinical stage and lymph node status, are independently additive to the epigenetic classifiers and in combination improve prediction. Despite advances in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer (BC), the main cause of deaths is resistance to existing therapies. An approach to improve the effectiveness of therapy in patients with aggressive BC subtypes is neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Yet, the response to NACT for aggressive subtypes is less than 65% according to large clinical trials. An obvious fact is the lack of biomarkers predicting the therapeutic effect of NACT. In a search for epigenetic markers, we performed genome-wide differential methylation screening by XmaI-RRBS in cohorts of NACT responders and nonresponders, for triple-negative (TN) and luminal B tumors. The predictive potential of the most discriminative loci was further assessed in independent cohorts by methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme quantitative PCR (MSRE-qPCR), a promising method for the implementation of DNA methylation markers in diagnostic laboratories. The selected most informative individual markers were combined into panels demonstrating cvAUC = 0.83 (TMEM132D and MYO15B markers panel) for TN tumors and cvAUC = 0.76 (TTC34, LTBR and CLEC14A) for luminal B tumors. The combination of methylation markers with clinical features that correlate with NACT effect (clinical stage for TN and lymph node status for luminal B tumors) produces better classifiers, with cvAUC = 0.87 for TN tumors and cvAUC = 0.83 for luminal B tumors. Thus, clinical characteristics predictive of NACT response are independently additive to the epigenetic classifier and in combination improve prediction.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer patients.
    Nakano, E.
    Hojo, T.
    Masumura, K.
    Kikuyama, M.
    Akashi, S.
    Kinoshita, T.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 69 (02) : 337S - 337S
  • [32] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer
    Goncalves, Anthony
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2016, 103 (06) : S76 - S89
  • [33] Androgen receptor expression and outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer
    Di Leone, A.
    Fragomeni, S. M.
    Scardina, L.
    Ionta, L.
    Mule, A.
    Magno, S.
    Terribile, D.
    Masetti, R.
    Franceschini, G.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 25 (04) : 1910 - 1915
  • [34] Prospects of Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Qiu, Dan
    Zhang, Guijuan
    Yan, Xianxin
    Xiao, Xinqin
    Ma, Xinyi
    Lin, Shujun
    Wu, Jieyan
    Li, Xinyuan
    Wang, Wandi
    Liu, Junchen
    Ma, Yi
    Ma, Min
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 11
  • [35] Residual cancer burden and neoangiogenesis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer
    Miyashita, M.
    Sasano, H.
    Tamaki, K.
    Hirakawa, H.
    Ishida, T.
    Ohuchi, N.
    BREAST, 2017, 32 : S100 - S101
  • [36] Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting rapid relapse in triple-negative breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Ma, Tao
    Liu, Xin-Yu
    Cai, Shuang-Long
    Zhang, Jin
    FRONTIERS IN CELL AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2024, 12
  • [37] Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Immunotherapy Result in Different Tumor Shrinkage Patterns in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Zou, Jiachen
    Zhang, Liulu
    Chen, Yuanqi
    Lin, Yingyi
    Cheng, Minyi
    Zheng, Xingxing
    Zhuang, Xiaosheng
    Wang, Kun
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2024, 27 (01) : 27 - 36
  • [38] DNA methylation markers panel can improve prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in luminal B breast cancer
    Vladimir O. Sigin
    Alexey I. Kalinkin
    Ekaterina B. Kuznetsova
    Olga A. Simonova
    Galina G. Chesnokova
    Nikolai V. Litviakov
    Elena M. Slonimskaya
    Matvey M. Tsyganov
    Marina K. Ibragimova
    Ilya V. Volodin
    Ilya I. Vinogradov
    Maksim I. Vinogradov
    Igor Y. Vinogradov
    Sergey I. Kutsev
    Vladimir V. Strelnikov
    Dmitry V. Zaletaev
    Alexander S. Tanas
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [39] A DNA methylation markers panel for prediction of luminal B breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy response by quantitative PCR
    Nikolaeva, A.
    Sigin, V.
    Kalinkin, A. I.
    Litviakov, N. V.
    Slonimskaya, E.
    Tsyganov, M.
    Kharitonova, A.
    Vinogradov, I.
    Vinogradov, M.
    Strelnikov, V. V.
    Tanas, A. S.
    Vinogradov, I.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 : S386 - S386
  • [40] DNA methylation markers panel can improve prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in luminal B breast cancer
    Sigin, Vladimir O.
    Kalinkin, Alexey, I
    Kuznetsova, Ekaterina B.
    Simonova, Olga A.
    Chesnokova, Galina G.
    Litviakov, Nikolai, V
    Slonimskaya, Elena M.
    Tsyganov, Matvey M.
    Ibragimova, Marina K.
    Volodin, Ilya V.
    Vinogradov, Ilya I.
    Vinogradov, Maksim, I
    Vinogradov, Igor Y.
    Kutsev, Sergey, I
    Strelnikov, Vladimir V.
    Zaletaev, Dmitry, V
    Tanas, Alexander S.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)