Bayesian approaches to include real-world data in clinical studies

被引:4
|
作者
Muller, P. [1 ]
Chandra, N. K. [2 ]
Sarkar, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Stat & Data Sci, 2317 Speedway D9800, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Texas Dallas, Dept Math Sci, 800 W Campbell Rd, Richardson, TX 75080 USA
关键词
common atoms mixture model; propensity scores; real-world data; PROPENSITY SCORE; REGRESSION; DISTRIBUTIONS; TRIALS; ARM;
D O I
10.1098/rsta.2022.0158
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Randomized clinical trials have been the mainstay of clinical research, but are prohibitively expensive and subject to increasingly difficult patient recruitment. Recently, there is a movement to use real-world data (RWD) from electronic health records, patient registries, claims data and other sources in lieu of or supplementing controlled clinical trials. This process of combining information from diverse sources calls for inference under a Bayesian paradigm. We review some of the currently used methods and a novel non-parametric Bayesian (BNP) method. Carrying out the desired adjustment for differences in patient populations is naturally done with BNP priors that facilitate understanding of and adjustment for population heterogeneities across different data sources. We discuss the particular problem of using RWD to create a synthetic control arm to supplement single-arm treatment only studies. At the core of the proposed approach is the model-based adjustment to achieve equivalent patient populations in the current study and the (adjusted) RWD. This is implemented using common atoms mixture models. The structure of such models greatly simplifies inference. The adjustment for differences in the populations can be reduced to ratios of weights in such mixtures.This article is part of the theme issue 'Bayesian inference: challenges, perspectives, and prospects'.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 474
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Do real world studies include real world patients in MS?
    Rojas, J. I.
    Patrucco, L.
    Cristiano, E.
    Sanchez, F.
    [J]. MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2019, 25 : 526 - 526
  • [22] PERICOACH® CLINICAL STUDY AND REAL-WORLD DATA INSIGHTS
    Cornelius, C.
    Monsour, M.
    Noursalehi, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 30 : S332 - S332
  • [23] USING REAL-WORLD DATA TO INFORM SMARTER CLINICAL TRIALS AND PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES
    Mehta, S.
    Mountford, W. K.
    McDonald, M. R.
    Stolper, R.
    Zakar, J.
    Lobeck, F.
    Christian, J. B.
    Lang, K.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (05) : A345 - A345
  • [24] A novel approach to augment single-arm clinical studies with real-world data
    Sachdeva, Archie
    Tiwari, Ram C.
    Guha, Subharup
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2022, 32 (01) : 141 - 157
  • [25] Data Science Methods for Real-World Evidence Generation in Real-World Data
    Liu, Fang
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOMEDICAL DATA SCIENCE, 2024, 7 : 201 - 224
  • [26] Strategies to Turn Real-world Data Into Real-world Knowledge
    Hong, Julian C.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (10)
  • [27] Deriving Real-World Insights From Real-World Data
    Baker, Stuart G.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 170 (09) : 664 - 665
  • [28] Real-world experiences with generating real-world evidence: Case Studies from PCORI's pragmatic clinical Studies program
    Neuman, Mark D.
    Kappelman, Michael D.
    Israel, Elliot
    Ellenberg, Susan S.
    Girman, Cindy
    Robb, Jess
    Rabinowitz, Allie
    Trontell, Anne
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2020, 98
  • [29] Assessing Real-World Data Quality: The Application of Patient Registry Quality Criteria to Real-World Data and Real-World Evidence
    Gliklich, Richard E.
    Leavy, Michelle B.
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2020, 54 (02) : 303 - 307
  • [30] Assessing Real-World Data Quality: The Application of Patient Registry Quality Criteria to Real-World Data and Real-World Evidence
    Richard E. Gliklich
    Michelle B. Leavy
    [J]. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2020, 54 : 303 - 307