Evaluation of healthcare professionals' understanding of fluoroquinolones' safety profile, usage, and boxed warnings in Pakistan

被引:0
|
作者
Abbas, Muhammad [1 ]
Kashmiri, Kashif [1 ]
Rehman, Inayat Ur [1 ]
Ali, Zahid [2 ]
Rahman, Aziz Ur [3 ]
Khalil, Asad [4 ]
Ming, Long Chiau [5 ]
Shafique, Muhammad [6 ]
Khan, Tahir Mehmood [7 ]
机构
[1] Abdul Wali Khan Univ Mardan, Dept Pharm, Mardan, Pakistan
[2] Univ Peshawar, Dept Pharm, Peshawar, Pakistan
[3] North West Gen Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Urol, Peshawar, Pakistan
[4] Lady Reading Hosp, Dept Med, Peshawar, Pakistan
[5] Sunway Univ, Jalan Univ, Sch Med & Life Sci, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia
[6] Shaqra Univ, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Shaqra, Saudi Arabia
[7] Univ Vet & Anim Sci, Inst Pharmaceut Sci, Lahore, Pakistan
关键词
Health care professionals; Fluoroquinolones; Box warning; Pakistan; ANTIBIOTIC USE; MEDICATIONS; ASSOCIATION; RISK;
D O I
10.1186/s40545-023-00674-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Fluoroquinolones (FQs) is a distinct class of antibiotics which are prescribed and used quite fre-quently worldwide, despite the box warnings (BW ) issued by Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Literature has shown in spite of BWs related to FQs there is minimal impact on health care professionals (HCPs) prescribing habits, potentially attributing towards limited and insufficient awareness. In Pakistan, FQs are mostly prescribed antibiotics for microbial treatments, therefore the purpose of this study was to determine the level of knowledge about the safety profile, use, and BW of FQs among HCPs working in Pakistan.MethodsA cross-sectional study was undertaken among the HCPs of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Paki-stan from October 2022 to December 2022. A validated questionnaire was used to assess the knowledge of HCPs regarding FQs, its safety profile and BW. A random convenient sample technique was used while recruiting HCPs in this study. As the HCPs comprised physicians, dentists, pharmacist and nurses, all were approached in person and the study objective was fully elaborated and explained to them. The statistic test like: one-way ANOVA, independent-t test, multivariate logistic regression were used keeping the p-value < 0.05 as statistically significant.Results A total of n= 250 HCPs were approached, of which n= 186 HCPs completed the questionnaire with a response rate of 74.4%. FQs prescribing pattern was only assessed among the prescribers, i.e., physicians and dentists (39/186). The mean knowledge score for indications was 5.29 +/- 3.05, while for the adverse effects was 7.70 +/- 2.61. The highest score for knowledge for indications and adverse effect score was achieved by physicians followed by dentist. The mean knowledge score for the BW was 3.46 +/- 2.93 and among the HCPs for the BW of FQs, 20.4% of the HCPs had appropriate knowledge score (score >= 50%). The knowledge score was significantly higher in males (p = 0.039), dentists (p= 0.001), HCPs having master/specialization level of education (p = 0.003), HCPs work-ing in government sector hospitals (p= 0.010) and secondary care hospitals (p= 0.001) while the multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that HCPs working in primary care hospital (OR: 6.2) and secondary care hospital (OR: 20.3) were associated with the tendency to achieve 50% or above knowledge score.<br />Conclusion Findings of this study reveals the unsatisfactory knowledge of HCPs regarding the safety profile, use, and BW of FQs putting patients at heightened risks of FQs associated AEs. Therefore, it is crucial to implement a national antimicrobial stewardship program, seminars and lectures aimed at continuously updating the knowledge of HCPs, regardless of their specialties, and effectively restrict the misuse of antimicrobial and disseminate FDA BWs in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [21] Assessment of the understanding and awareness of bioethics among healthcare professionals in all public and private hospitals of Haripur district, Pakistan: a multicentre cross-sectional study
    Ateeb, Muhammad
    ul Haq, Ijaz
    Zakki, Shahbaz Ahmad
    Altaf, Ehtisham
    Junaid, Muhammad
    Ali, Mustafa
    Rehman, Atif Ur
    Wajid, Daniyal
    Fareed, Abdullah
    Mehmood, Asad
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (08):
  • [22] The impact of UK Medicines Information services on patient care, clinical outcomes and medicines safety: an evaluation of healthcare professionals' opinions
    Innes, Alison J.
    Bramley, Diane M.
    Wills, Simon
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2014, 21 (04): : 222 - 228
  • [23] Evaluation by Healthcare professionals of patient's understanding and ease of use of a novel pen device for the self-administration of follitropin beta.
    Butler, A
    Orr, R
    Moffitt, D
    Rodrigues, H
    Mahony, M
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 83 : S22 - S23
  • [24] Understanding the implementation of 'Making Every Contact Count' (MECC) delivered by healthcare professionals in a mental health hospital: protocol for a pragmatic formative process evaluation
    Rodrigues, Angela M.
    Kemp, Emma
    Aquino, Maria Raisa Jessica
    Wilson, Rob
    Vasiljevic, Milica
    McBride, Kate
    Robson, Craig
    Loraine, Mish
    Harland, Jill
    Haighton, Catherine
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2023, 11 (01):
  • [25] Safety concerns reported by consumers, manufacturers and healthcare professionals: A detailed evaluation of opioid-related adverse drug reactions in theFDAdatabase over 15 years
    Andreaggi, Christian A.
    Novak, Emily A.
    Mirabile, Mitchell E.
    Sampathkumar, Shivani
    Gray, Matthew P.
    He, Meiqi
    Kane-Gill, Sandra L.
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 29 (12) : 1627 - 1635