Toward Trusted IoT by General Proof-of-Work

被引:1
|
作者
Hsueh, Chih-Wen [1 ]
Chin, Chi-Ting [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Informat Engn, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
[2] Ming Chuan Univ, Dept Risk Management & Insurance, Taipei 11103, Taiwan
关键词
IoT; blockchain; finality; consensus; PoW; PoPT; PowerTimestamp; synchronization; energy; metaverse; TIME;
D O I
10.3390/s23010015
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Internet of Things (IoT) is used to describe devices with sensors that connect and exchange data with other devices or systems on the Internet or other communication networks. Actually, the data not only represent the concrete things connected but also describe the abstract matters related. Therefore, it is expected to support trust on IoT since blockchain was invented so that trusted IoT could be possible or, recently, even metaverse could be imaginable. However, IoT systems are usually composed of a lot of device nodes with limited computing power. The built-in unsolved performance and energy-consumption problems in blockchain become more critical in IoT. The other problems such as finality, privacy, or scalability introduce even more complexity so that trusted IoT is still far from realization, let alone the metaverse. With general Proof of Work (GPoW), the energy consumption of Bitcoin can be reduced to less than 1 billionth and proof of PowerTimestamp (PoPT) can be constructed so that a global even ordering can be reached to conduct synchronization on distributed systems in real-time. Therefore, trusted IoT is possible. We reintroduce GPoW with more mathematic proofs so that PoPT can be optimal and describe how PoPT can be realized with simulation results, mining examples and synchronization scenario toward trusted IoT.
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Workflow Management on Proof-of-Work Blockchains: Implications and Recommendations
    Evermann J.
    Kim H.
    [J]. SN Computer Science, 2021, 2 (1)
  • [42] Proof-of-Work cryptocurrency mining: a statistical approach to fairness
    Li, Sheng-Nan
    Yang, Zhao
    Tessone, Claudio J.
    [J]. 2020 IEEE/CIC INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS IN CHINA (ICCC WORKSHOPS), 2020, : 156 - 161
  • [43] Empirical risk analysis of mining a Proof-of-Work blockchain
    Albrecher, Hansjorg
    Finger, Dina
    Goffard, Pierre-O.
    [J]. DECISIONS IN ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2024,
  • [44] On the trade-offs of Proof-of-Work algorithms in blockchains
    Chin, Zi Hau
    Yap, Timothy Tzen Vun
    Tan, Ian K. T.
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (ICCST 2019), 2020, 603 : 575 - 584
  • [45] On the Use of Proof-of-Work in Permissioned Blockchains: Security and Fairness
    Malakhov, Ivan
    Marin, Andrea
    Rossi, Sabina
    Smuseva, Daria
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 1305 - 1316
  • [46] Using Useful Tasks for Proof-of-Work for Blockchain Systems
    D. M. Murin
    V. N. Knyazev
    [J]. Automatic Control and Computer Sciences, 2020, 54 : 594 - 600
  • [47] Approaches to Overpower Proof-of-Work Blockchains Despite Minority
    Baniata, Hamza
    Kertesz, Attila
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 2952 - 2967
  • [48] Bitcoin: a new proof-of-work system with reduced variance
    Bazzanella, Danilo
    Gangemi, Andrea
    [J]. FINANCIAL INNOVATION, 2023, 9 (01)
  • [49] Using Useful Tasks for Proof-of-Work for Blockchain Systems
    Murin, D. M.
    Knyazev, V. N.
    [J]. AUTOMATIC CONTROL AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2020, 54 (07) : 594 - 600
  • [50] Attack Incentive and Security of Exchanging Tokens on Proof-of-Work Blockchain
    Abe, Ryosuke
    Nakamura, Keita
    Teramoto, Kentaro
    Takahashi, Misato
    [J]. ASIAN INTERNET ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (AINTEC 2018), 2015, : 32 - 37