Interpregnancy Interval Effect on Perinatal Outcome- A Prospective Observational Study

被引:1
|
作者
Bera, Moumita [1 ]
Chaudhury, Nilanjana [1 ]
Samanta, Subrata [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] RG Kar Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
[2] 152-A,Gopal Lal Tagore Rd, Kolkata 700108, West Bengal, India
关键词
Birth spacing; Contraceptive use; Preterm delivery; BIRTH; HEALTH; INFANT; RISK;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2023/57940.17706
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Spacing of birth is an important parameter affecting maternal and foetal health. Optimal birth spacing provides multiple benefits for both mother and her child. Both short and long Inter-Pregnancy Intervals (IPI) is associated with multiple adverse perinatal outcomes. Therefore, IPI is viewed as a potential modifiable risk factor for adverse foetal-maternal outcome.Aim: To study the association of IPIs with adverse maternal and foetal outcomes.Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India for a period of 18 months from January 2019 to June 2020. All multigravida women with atleast three antenatal check-ups were included in the study. The subjects were divided in two groups: group A consisted of 86 subjects, who had <2 year IPI and group B consisted of 87 subjects, who had >= 2 year IPI. These were compared on the basis of following socio-demographic characteristics: maternal age, Body Mass Index (BMI), contraceptive use, socio-economic status. Foetal outcome was assessed by gestational age at delivery, birth weight, Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity and Respiration (APGAR) score, need for Neonatal Intensive Care Unit/Sick Neonatal Care Unit (NICU/SNCU) admission and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Data were collected and statistically analysed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 19.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Chi-square test was used for categorical data and students t-test was used for continuous data. Statistical significance in all evaluations was defined as p-value <0.05.Results: Contraception use were significantly less in women with short IPI (p=0.001). The incidence of anaemia (p=0.026), scar dehiscence in postcaesarean pregnancies (p=0.031) and Post Partum Haemorrhage (PPH) (p=0.041) were also higher in mothers with short IPI. In this group incidence of low-birth -weight baby (p=0.039), preterm birth (p=0.041) and need for care of babies in NICU (p=0.043) were also higher and was statistically significant.Conclusion: Lack of contraceptive use significantly increases the risk of short IPI which increases the risk of preterm delivery, maternal anaemia PPH and scar rupture in post-CS pregnancy and therefore, has a serious impact on maternal morbidity. Low birth weight and NICU/SNCU admission being more in group A was a drain on the health expenditure.
引用
收藏
页码:QC1 / QC4
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Relationship Between Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Perinatal Outcomes.
    Yee, Lynn M.
    Truong, Yen N.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    Cheng, Yvonne W.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2015, 22 : 352A - 353A
  • [22] Interpregnancy interval after vacuum delivery and subsequent perinatal outcomes
    Bachar, Gal
    Farago, Naama
    Weissman, Amir
    Khatib, Nizar
    Ginsberg, Yuval
    Vitner, Dana
    Beloosesky, Ron
    Weiner, Zeev
    Zipori, Yaniv
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2024, 167 (02) : 753 - 757
  • [23] Impact of the interpregnancy interval after cesarean delivery on subsequent perinatal risks: a retrospective study
    Yumi Nakamura
    Hiroyuki Tsuda
    Yoshiki Masahashi
    Takuto Nakamura
    Miho Suzuki
    Nobuhiko Fukuhara
    Yumiko Ito
    Atsuko Tezuka
    Tomoko Ando
    Kimio Mizuno
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2023, 308 : 479 - 485
  • [24] In vitro fertilization, interpregnancy interval, and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes
    Palmsten, Kristin
    Homer, Michael V.
    Zhang, Yujia
    Crawford, Sara
    Kirby, Russell S.
    Copeland, Glenn
    Chambers, Christina D.
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    Su, H. Irene
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 109 (05) : 840 - +
  • [25] Impact of interpregnancy interval on the subsequent risk of adverse perinatal outcomes
    Ekin, Atalay
    Gezer, Cenk
    Taner, Cuneyt Eftal
    Ozeren, Mehmet
    Mat, Emre
    Solmaz, Ulas
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2015, 41 (11) : 1744 - 1751
  • [26] A nomogram for predicting adverse perinatal outcome with fetal growth restriction: a prospective observational study
    Zhao, Ying
    Xu, Lei
    An, Ping
    Zhou, Jizi
    Zhu, Jie
    Liu, Shuangping
    Zhou, Qiongjie
    Li, Xiaotian
    Xiong, Yu
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [27] Interpregnancy Weight Change and Risk for Adverse Perinatal Outcome
    Bogaerts, Annick
    Van den Bergh, Bea R. H.
    Ameye, Lieveke
    Witters, Ingrid
    Martens, Evelyne
    Timmerman, Dirk
    Devlieger, Roland
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 122 (05): : 999 - 1009
  • [28] ABDOMINAL INJURY AND ITS OUTCOME- A PROSPECTIVE STUDY IN A TERTIARY HEALTH CARE CENTER
    Singh, U. C.
    Jina, Abhishek
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2019, 8 (18): : 1428 - 1432
  • [29] Observational Study to determine the relationship between inter-twin delivery time interval and perinatal outcome
    Quek, Y. S.
    Ravichandran, N.
    Woon, S. Y.
    Kaliammah, M. K.
    Shantala, V
    Ravichandran, J.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 119 : 13 - 13
  • [30] Risk factors and perinatal consequences of short interpregnancy interval: A retrospective case-control study
    Vandenbroucke, L.
    Lavoue, V.
    Voltzenlogel, M. -C.
    Le Guellec, M.
    Lassel, L.
    Isly, H.
    Poulain, P.
    Morcel, K.
    JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION, 2013, 42 (02): : 166 - 173