Introducing an efficiency index to evaluate eVTOL designs

被引:15
|
作者
Bridgelall, Raj [1 ]
Askarzadeh, Taraneh [1 ]
Tolliver, Denver D. [2 ]
机构
[1] North Dakota State Univ, Coll Business, Transportat Logist & Finance, POB 6050, Fargo, ND 58108 USA
[2] North Dakota State Univ, Upper Great Plains Transportat Inst, POB 6050, Fargo, ND 58108 USA
关键词
Advanced air mobility; Aerodynamic efficiency; Multilinear regression; Regional air mobility; Smart cities; Urban air mobility; VEHICLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122539
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The evolution of electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft as part of the Advanced Air Mobility initiative will affect our society and the environment in fundamental ways. Technological forecasting suggests that commercial services are fast emerging to transform urban and regional air mobility for people and cargo. However, the complexities of diverse design choices pose a challenge for potential adopters or service providers because there are no objective and simple means to compare designs based on the available set of performance specifications. This analysis defines an aeronautically informed propulsion efficiency index (PEX) to compare the performance of eVTOL designs. Range, payload ratio, and aspect ratio are the minimum set of independent parameters needed to compute a PEX that can distinguish among eVTOL designs. The distribution of the PEX and the range are lognormal in the design space. There is no association between PEX values and the mainstream eVTOL architecture types or the aircraft weight class. A multilinear regression showed that the three independent parameters explained >90 % of the PEX distribution in the present design space.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Simulations to evaluate HIV vaccine trial designs
    Adams, AL
    Barth-Jones, DC
    Chick, SE
    Koopman, JS
    SIMULATION, 1998, 71 (04) : 228 - 241
  • [22] Using discrepancy to evaluate fractional factorial designs
    Liu, MQ
    MONTE CARLO AND QUASI-MONTE CARLO METHODS 2000, 2002, : 357 - 368
  • [23] Computational Modeling to Evaluate Helical Electrode Designs
    Cowley, Anthony W.
    Szlavik, Robert B.
    2011 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2011, : 2029 - 2032
  • [24] Using FRAM to evaluate ship designs and regulations
    Smith, D.
    Veitch, B.
    Khan, F.
    Taylor, R.
    MARINE DESIGN XIII, VOLS 1 & 2, 2018, : 677 - 683
  • [25] COUNTER-TIMERS EVALUATE DIGITAL DESIGNS
    BARKER, D
    ELECTRONIC DESIGN, 1992, 40 (18) : 84 - &
  • [26] Use data acquisition to evaluate cable designs
    Kelly, K
    ELECTRONIC DESIGN, 1997, 45 (13) : 94 - &
  • [27] Employing simulation to evaluate designs: The APEX approach
    Freed, MA
    Shafto, MG
    Remington, RW
    ENGINEERING FOR HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 1999, 22 : 207 - 223
  • [28] Introducing adaptive mechatronic designs in bulk handling industry
    van Kol, Tessa, V
    Jovanova, Jovana
    Mohajeri, M. Javad
    Schott, Dingena L.
    2021 IEEE/ASME INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED INTELLIGENT MECHATRONICS (AIM), 2021, : 1095 - 1100
  • [29] PARTIALLY EFFICIENCY BALANCED DESIGNS
    PURI, PD
    NIGAM, AK
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS PART A-THEORY AND METHODS, 1977, 6 (08): : 753 - 771
  • [30] EFFICIENCY-BALANCED DESIGNS
    WILLIAMS, ER
    BIOMETRIKA, 1975, 62 (03) : 686 - 689