US college students' perspectives on contraception and abortion post-Dobbs: the influence of socioeconomic privilege and gender inequity

被引:0
|
作者
Mann, Emily S. [1 ,2 ]
McLennan, Jessica A. [3 ]
Broussard, Kathleen [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Carolina, Arnold Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Promot, Columbia, SC USA
[2] Univ South Carolina, Coll Arts & Sci, Dept Womens & Gender Studies, Columbia, SC USA
[3] Univ South Carolina, South Carolina Honors Coll, Columbia, SC USA
[4] Univ South Carolina, Coll Arts & Sci, Dept Sociol, Columbia, SC USA
关键词
contraception; abortion; college students; reproductive health; United States; UNITED-STATES; BARRIERS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2023.1274154
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This study examined college students' perspectives about contraception and abortion in the context of the United States Supreme Court's decision to eliminate the constitutional right to abortion in June 2022. Individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted between October 2022 and February 2023 with a convenience sample of 20 college students, ages 18-22, attending a public university in the southeastern United States. Qualitative data analysis revealed three main themes. First, most participants conveyed fear, dismay, and anger about the decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization to overturn Roe v. Wade and a few expressed concerns about potential restrictions on contraception. Second, women participants felt heightened pressure to continue or initiate use of a highly effective contraceptive method, with some lamenting inequitable experiences of the gendered contraceptive burden in their relationships with men. Third, when asked what they would do if they or their partner became pregnant while in college, most asserted they would seek abortion. Notably, participants assumed their socioeconomic advantages would ensure their or their partner's access to abortion, regardless of growing restrictions. The findings illustrate that among a group of relatively privileged young adults, the Dobbs decision simultaneously compelled their increased vigilance regarding contraceptive use and conferred the perception that they would not be personally impacted should they need an abortion.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Self-Managed Abortion and Criminalization in the Post-Dobbs US
    Gerdts, Caitlin
    Sunderlin, Kylee
    Cardenas-Pena, Nancy
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (07)
  • [2] Abortion training in US obstetrics and gynecology residency programs in a post-Dobbs era
    Vinekar, Kavita
    Karlapudi, Aishwarya
    Bauer, Callie Cox
    Steinauer, Jody
    Rible, Radhika
    Brown, Katherine
    Turk, Jema K.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2024, 130
  • [3] US Obstetrician-Gynecologists' Perceived Impacts of Post-Dobbs v Jackson State Abortion Bans
    Sabbath, Erika L.
    McKetchnie, Samantha M.
    Arora, Kavita S.
    Buchbinder, Mara
    [J]. OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2024, 79 (07) : 389 - 391
  • [4] US Obstetrician-Gynecologists' Perceived Impacts of Post-Dobbs v Jackson State Abortion Bans
    Sabbath, Erika L.
    Mcketchnie, Samantha M.
    Arora, Kavita S.
    Buchbinder, Mara
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (01) : E2352109
  • [5] GENDER AND SOCIAL SUPPORT INFLUENCE HEALTH BEHAVIOR AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS IN KOREA AND THE US
    Suh, Sooyeon
    Emery, Charles F.
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2007, 33 : S82 - S82
  • [6] The influence of sex, gender, self-discrepancies, and self-awareness on anger and verbal aggressiveness among US college students
    Kinney, TA
    Smith, BA
    Donzella, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 141 (02): : 245 - 275