Abortion training in US obstetrics and gynecology residency programs in a post-Dobbs era

被引:2
|
作者
Vinekar, Kavita [1 ]
Karlapudi, Aishwarya [2 ]
Bauer, Callie Cox [3 ]
Steinauer, Jody [4 ]
Rible, Radhika [2 ]
Brown, Katherine [4 ]
Turk, Jema K. [4 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 833 Chestnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 10833 Conte Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Aurora Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 12th St, Milwaukee, WI 53233 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, 2356 Sutter St, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
关键词
Resident abortion training; Abortion policy; Dobbs; Obstetrics and gynecology; Graduate medical education; CARE; PHYSICIANS; MINORITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110291
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires all obstetrics and gynecology residents have access to abortion training. The impact of Dobbs on training remains unknown. We aimed to describe residency programs affected by abortion bans and those lacking abortion training despite permissive state policies. We considered demographic data to understand the impacts on residents underrepresented in medicine. Study design: We used residency databases and websites to abstract data. We identified programs offering routine abortion training as either those with Ryan Programs or those with website or email acknowledgment of training. We defined states with abortion bans as those with either complete or 6-week bans as of December 2022. We used chi 2 and Student's t tests in descriptive analyses and performed a logistic regression to adjust for demographic and program-specific variables. Results: Of 286 residency programs included, 140 (49%) offered routine abortion training prior to Dobbs. As of December 2022, 19 of these (14%) had lost the ability to provide routine in-state abortion training. Of 223 residency programs in states with legal abortion, 102 (46%) programs lacked routine abortion training. These sites were more likely to be community or community-university programs, with graduates more likely to practice as generalists. Resident race/ethnicity did not differ between residents in states with legal abortion vs abortion bans. Conclusions: Nearly half of obstetrics and gynecology residency programs in states with legal abortion do not appear to provide routine abortion training. Further work is needed to understand this paucity of training and maximize access in legislatively permissible environments. Implications: Following Dobbs, 14% of residency programs lost in-state abortion training. Notably, in states with legal abortion, 46% of programs lack routine abortion training despite permissive legislation. This presents a window of opportunity for expansion of abortion training, particularly at community and community-university hybrid residency sites. (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Abortion Training in US Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs
    Steinauer, Jody
    Turk, Jema
    Pomerantz, Tali
    Koenemann, Katheryn
    Simonson, Kristin
    Landy, Uta
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 130 : 44S - 45S
  • [2] Abortion training in US obstetrics and gynecology residency programs
    Steinauer, Jody E.
    Turk, Jema K.
    Pomerantz, Tali
    Simonson, Kristin
    Learman, Lee A.
    Landy, Uta
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 219 (01) : 86.e1 - 86.e6
  • [3] Abortion training in US obstetrics and gynecology residency programs, 1998
    Almeling, R
    Tews, L
    Dudley, S
    FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 2000, 32 (06): : 268 - +
  • [4] Abortion training in Canadian obstetrics and gynecology residency programs
    Liauw, J.
    Dineley, B.
    Gerster, K.
    Hill, N.
    Costescu, D.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2016, 94 (05) : 478 - 482
  • [5] Abortion training in Canadian obstetrics and gynecology residency programs
    Roy, Genevieve
    Parvataneni, Ram
    Friedman, Brooke
    Eastwood, Katherine
    Darney, Phillip D.
    Steinauer, Jody
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 108 (02): : 309 - 314
  • [6] Abortion training in United States obstetrics and gynecology residency programs
    Eastwood, Katherine L.
    Kacmar, Jennifer E.
    Steinauer, Jody
    Weitzen, Sherry
    Boardman, Lori A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 108 (02): : 303 - 308
  • [7] TRAINING IN INDUCED-ABORTION BY OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY RESIDENCY PROGRAMS
    LINDHEIM, BL
    COTTERILL, MA
    FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1978, 10 (01): : 24 - 28
  • [8] Restrictions affecting abortion training in obstetrics and gynecology residency programs
    Turk, J.
    Simonson, K.
    Landy, U.
    Steinauer, J.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2018, 98 (04) : 372 - 373
  • [9] ABORTION TRAINING IN UNITED-STATES OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY RESIDENCY PROGRAMS
    DARNEY, PD
    LANDY, U
    MACPHERSON, S
    SWEET, RL
    FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1987, 19 (04): : 158 - 162
  • [10] Sources of support for and resistance to abortion training in obstetrics and gynecology residency programs
    Turk, Jema K.
    Landy, Uta
    Chien, Jessie
    Steinauer, Jody E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 221 (02) : 156.e1 - 156.e6