Performance Evaluation of TWIST Welding Using Machine Learning Assisted Evolutionary Algorithms

被引:6
|
作者
Kumar, Dhiraj [1 ]
Ganguly, Samriddhi [1 ]
Acherjee, Bappa [2 ]
Kuar, Arunanshu Shekhar [1 ]
机构
[1] Jadavpur Univ, Dept Prod Engn, Kolkata 700032, India
[2] Birla Inst Technol, Dept Prod & Ind Engn, Ranchi 835215, India
关键词
Laser transmission welding; TWIST; Artificial neural network; Evolutionary algorithm; Machine learning; Multi-objective optimization; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; GENETIC ALGORITHM; OPTIMIZATION; PREDICTION; PARAMETERS; ATTRIBUTES; POLYMERS; GEOMETRY; TOOL; GA;
D O I
10.1007/s13369-023-08238-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The Transmission welding using incremental scanning technique (TWIST) combines linear feed with an oscillating laser beam to enhance weld quality and expand the process window. However, TWIST welding is influenced by nonlinear process variables, and achieving multiple objectives concurrently is challenging due to conflicting performance attributes. In industrial practice, time constraints and project specifications limit the effectiveness of methodologies tailored to specific workpiece materials or single performance optimization. The present study employs an artificial neural network (ANN) to establish a correlation between TWIST welding parameters and desired performance attributes. Various ANN model architectures are evaluated, with the 5-11-6-2 architecture achieving the highest accuracy (correlation coefficient of 0.998). For multi-objective optimization, the non-dominated sorted genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) and non-dominated sorted teaching learning-based optimization (NSTLBO) algorithm are employed, utilizing the ANN model's fitness function as the objective. The newly developed two-step model provides operators with the flexibility to prioritize factors based on project requirements, resulting in improved outcomes. Comparative analysis of the algorithms using seven metrics demonstrates that NSGA-II outperforms NSTLBO in solution prediction, albeit with slightly increased computing time. NSGA-II offers a broader range of Pareto optimum solutions compared to NSTLBO, which converges narrowly and restricts non-dominated sets. Validation experiments confirm the adequacy of both algorithms, supporting the effectiveness of the two-step model. The proposed methodology enables practitioners to achieve better weld quality, accommodate conflicting performance attributes, and effectively optimize multiple objectives in industrial applications.
引用
收藏
页码:2411 / 2441
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Performance Evaluation of Best Feature Subsets for Crop Yield Prediction Using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Gopal, Maya P. S.
    Bhargavi, R.
    [J]. APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2019, 33 (07) : 621 - 642
  • [22] Performance evaluation of DHRR-RIS based HP design using machine learning algorithms
    Bangalore Institute of Technology, Visvesvaraya Technological University, Department of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering, Bangalore
    560004, India
    不详
    560004, India
    [J]. Intell. Converg. Netw, 2023, 3 (237-260): : 237 - 260
  • [23] StarTroper, a film trope rating optimizer using machine learning and evolutionary algorithms
    Hector Garcia-Ortega, Ruben
    Garcia-Sanchez, Pablo
    Julian Merelo-Guervos, Juan
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS, 2020, 37 (06)
  • [24] Design of polymers for energy storage capacitors using machine learning and evolutionary algorithms
    Joseph Kern
    Lihua Chen
    Chiho Kim
    Rampi Ramprasad
    [J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2021, 56 : 19623 - 19635
  • [25] Abrasive waterjet drilling process enhancement using machine learning and evolutionary algorithms
    Nagarajan, Lenin
    Mahalingam, Siva Kumar
    Vasudevan, Balaji
    [J]. MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2024, 39 (15) : 2166 - 2182
  • [26] Design of polymers for energy storage capacitors using machine learning and evolutionary algorithms
    Kern, Joseph
    Chen, Lihua
    Kim, Chiho
    Ramprasad, Rampi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2021, 56 (35) : 19623 - 19635
  • [27] Optimizzing simulated manufacturing systems using machine learning coupled to evolutionary algorithms
    Huyet, AL
    Paris, JL
    [J]. ETFA 2001: 8TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES AND FACTORY AUTOMATION, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 17 - 21
  • [28] Performance Analysis on Student Feedback using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Katragadda, Sharnitha
    Ravi, Varshitha
    Kumar, Prasanna
    Lakshmi, G. Jaya
    [J]. 2020 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (ICACCS), 2020, : 1161 - 1163
  • [29] Comparing the performance of machine learning algorithms using estimated accuracy
    Gupta, Sunil
    Saluja, Kamal
    Goyal, Ankur
    Vajpayee, Amit
    Tiwari, Vipin
    [J]. Measurement: Sensors, 2022, 24
  • [30] Predicting Fitness and Performance of Diving using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Mahajan, Uma
    Krishnan, Anup
    Malhotra, Vineet
    Sharma, Deep
    Gore, Sharad
    [J]. 2019 IEEE PUNE SECTION INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE (PUNECON), 2019,