Performance Evaluation of TWIST Welding Using Machine Learning Assisted Evolutionary Algorithms

被引:6
|
作者
Kumar, Dhiraj [1 ]
Ganguly, Samriddhi [1 ]
Acherjee, Bappa [2 ]
Kuar, Arunanshu Shekhar [1 ]
机构
[1] Jadavpur Univ, Dept Prod Engn, Kolkata 700032, India
[2] Birla Inst Technol, Dept Prod & Ind Engn, Ranchi 835215, India
关键词
Laser transmission welding; TWIST; Artificial neural network; Evolutionary algorithm; Machine learning; Multi-objective optimization; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; GENETIC ALGORITHM; OPTIMIZATION; PREDICTION; PARAMETERS; ATTRIBUTES; POLYMERS; GEOMETRY; TOOL; GA;
D O I
10.1007/s13369-023-08238-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The Transmission welding using incremental scanning technique (TWIST) combines linear feed with an oscillating laser beam to enhance weld quality and expand the process window. However, TWIST welding is influenced by nonlinear process variables, and achieving multiple objectives concurrently is challenging due to conflicting performance attributes. In industrial practice, time constraints and project specifications limit the effectiveness of methodologies tailored to specific workpiece materials or single performance optimization. The present study employs an artificial neural network (ANN) to establish a correlation between TWIST welding parameters and desired performance attributes. Various ANN model architectures are evaluated, with the 5-11-6-2 architecture achieving the highest accuracy (correlation coefficient of 0.998). For multi-objective optimization, the non-dominated sorted genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) and non-dominated sorted teaching learning-based optimization (NSTLBO) algorithm are employed, utilizing the ANN model's fitness function as the objective. The newly developed two-step model provides operators with the flexibility to prioritize factors based on project requirements, resulting in improved outcomes. Comparative analysis of the algorithms using seven metrics demonstrates that NSGA-II outperforms NSTLBO in solution prediction, albeit with slightly increased computing time. NSGA-II offers a broader range of Pareto optimum solutions compared to NSTLBO, which converges narrowly and restricts non-dominated sets. Validation experiments confirm the adequacy of both algorithms, supporting the effectiveness of the two-step model. The proposed methodology enables practitioners to achieve better weld quality, accommodate conflicting performance attributes, and effectively optimize multiple objectives in industrial applications.
引用
收藏
页码:2411 / 2441
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance Evaluation of TWIST Welding Using Machine Learning Assisted Evolutionary Algorithms
    Dhiraj Kumar
    Samriddhi Ganguly
    Bappa Acherjee
    Arunanshu Shekhar Kuar
    [J]. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2024, 49 : 2411 - 2441
  • [2] Performance evaluation of genetic algorithms and evolutionary programming in optimization and machine learning
    Abu-Zitar, R
    Nuseirat, AMA
    [J]. CYBERNETICS AND SYSTEMS, 2002, 33 (03) : 203 - 223
  • [3] Automated Machine Learning using Evolutionary Algorithms
    Anton, Mihai
    [J]. 2020 IEEE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT COMPUTER COMMUNICATION AND PROCESSING (ICCP 2020), 2020, : 101 - 107
  • [4] Performance evaluation of friction stir welding using machine learning approaches
    Verma, Shubham
    Gupta, Meenu
    Misra, Joy Prakash
    [J]. METHODSX, 2018, 5 : 1048 - 1058
  • [5] Instructor Performance Evaluation Through Machine Learning Algorithms
    Sowmiya, J.
    Kalaiselvi, K.
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL VISION AND BIO-INSPIRED COMPUTING, 2020, 1108 : 751 - 767
  • [6] Performance evaluation of evolutionary multiobjective optimization algorithms for multiobjective fuzzy genetics-based machine learning
    Hisao Ishibuchi
    Yusuke Nakashima
    Yusuke Nojima
    [J]. Soft Computing, 2011, 15 : 2415 - 2434
  • [7] Machine learning algorithms for diabetes detection: a comparative evaluation of performance of algorithms
    Surabhi Saxena
    Debashish Mohapatra
    Subhransu Padhee
    Goutam Kumar Sahoo
    [J]. Evolutionary Intelligence, 2023, 16 : 587 - 603
  • [8] Performance evaluation of evolutionary multiobjective optimization algorithms for multiobjective fuzzy genetics-based machine learning
    Ishibuchi, Hisao
    Nakashima, Yusuke
    Nojima, Yusuke
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2011, 15 (12) : 2415 - 2434
  • [9] Machine learning algorithms for diabetes detection: a comparative evaluation of performance of algorithms
    Saxena, Surabhi
    Mohapatra, Debashish
    Padhee, Subhransu
    Sahoo, Goutam Kumar
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 16 (02) : 587 - 603
  • [10] Performance evaluation of machine learning algorithms using optical and microwave data for LULC classification
    Chachondhia, Prachi
    Shakya, Achala
    Kumar, Gaurav
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING APPLICATIONS-SOCIETY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 23