Treatment prediction with machine learning in prostate cancer patients

被引:2
|
作者
Alatas, Emre [1 ,2 ]
Kokkulunk, Handan Tanyildizi [3 ]
Tanyildizi, Hilal [4 ,5 ]
Alcin, Goksel [6 ]
机构
[1] Beykent Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Management Informat Syst, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Kadir Has Univ, Inst Sci & Technol, Management Informat Syst, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Altinbas Univ, Vocat Sch Hlth Serv, Radiotherapy Program, Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Beykent Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Int Trade & Finance, Istanbul, Turkiye
[5] Istanbul Univ, Inst Social Sci, Business Adm, Istanbul, Turkiye
[6] Istanbul Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Prostate cancer; support vector machine; random forest; decision tree; machine learning;
D O I
10.1080/10255842.2023.2298364
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
There are various treatment modalities for prostate cancer, which has a high incidence. In this study, it is aimed to make predictions with machine learning in order to determine the optimal treatment option for prostate cancer patients. The study included 88 male patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. Independent variables were determined as Gleason scores, biopsy, PSA, SUVmax, and age. Prostate cancer treatments, which are dependent variables, were determined as hormone therapy(n = 30), radiotherapy(n = 28) and radiotherapy + hormone therapy(n = 30). Machine learning was carried out in the Python with SVM, RF, DT, ETC and XGBoost. Metrics such as accuracy, ROC curve, and AUC were used to evaluate the performance of multi-class predictions. The model with the highest number of successful predictions was the XGBoost. False negative rates for hormone therapy, radiotherapy, and radiotherapy + hormone therapy treatments were, respectively, 12.5, 33.3, and 0%. The accuracy values were computed as 0.61, 0.83, 0.83, 0.72 and 0.89 for SVM, RF, DT, ETC and XGBoost, respectively. The three features that had the greatest influence on the treatment model prediction for prostate cancer with XGBoost were biopsy, Gleason score (3 + 3), and PSA level, respectively. According to the AUC, ROC and accuracy, it was determined that the XGBoost was the model that made the best estimation of prostate cancer treatment. Among the variables biopsy, Gleason score, and PSA level are identified as key variables in prediction of treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prediction of Chemosensitivity in Multiple Primary Cancer Patients Using Machine Learning
    Zhang, Xianglan
    Jang, Mi
    Zheng, Zhenlong
    Gao, Aihua
    Lin, Zhenhua
    Kim, Ki-Yeol
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 41 (05) : 2419 - 2429
  • [42] Survivability Prediction for Patients with Tonsil Cancer Utilizing Machine Learning Algorithms
    Nobin, Rasel Hider
    Rahman, Mokhlesur
    Alam, Mohammad Jahangir
    [J]. 2022 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT CYBERNETICS TECHNOLOGY & APPLICATIONS (ICICYTA), 2022, : 210 - 215
  • [43] Exploring Machine Learning Models for Recurrence Prediction in Lung Cancer Patients
    Ramesh, Priyanka
    Jain, Anika
    Karuppasamy, Ramanathan
    Veerappapillai, Shanthi
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2022, 56 (03) : S398 - S406
  • [44] Prediction of Cervical Cancer Patients' Survival Period with Machine Learning Techniques
    Chanudom, Intorn
    Tharavichitkul, Ekkasit
    Laosiritaworn, Wimalin
    [J]. HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS RESEARCH, 2024, 30 (01) : 60 - 72
  • [45] Machine learning prediction of financial toxicity in patients with resected lung cancer
    Deboever, Nathaniel
    Al-Tashi, Qasem
    Eisenberg, Michael
    Hofstetter, Wayne
    Mehran, Reza
    Rice, David
    Roth, Jack
    Sepesi, Boris
    Swisher, Stephen
    Vaporciyan, Ara
    Walsh, Garrett
    Antonoff, Mara
    Wu, Jia
    Rajaram, Ravi
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 83 (07)
  • [46] Machine learning-based prediction of invisible intraprostatic prostate cancer lesions on 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in patients with primary prostate cancer
    Zhilong Yi
    Siqi Hu
    Xiaofeng Lin
    Qiong Zou
    MinHong Zou
    Zhanlei Zhang
    Lei Xu
    Ningyi Jiang
    Yong Zhang
    [J]. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2022, 49 : 1523 - 1534
  • [47] Machine learning-based prediction of invisible intraprostatic prostate cancer lesions on 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in patients with primary prostate cancer
    Yi, Zhilong
    Hu, Siqi
    Lin, Xiaofeng
    Zou, Qiong
    Zou, MinHong
    Zhang, Zhanlei
    Xu, Lei
    Jiang, Ningyi
    Zhang, Yong
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2022, 49 (05) : 1523 - 1534
  • [48] Clinical application of machine learning models in patients with prostate cancer before prostatectomy
    Adalgisa Guerra
    Matthew R. Orton
    Helen Wang
    Marianna Konidari
    Kris Maes
    Nickolas K. Papanikolaou
    Dow Mu Koh
    [J]. Cancer Imaging, 24
  • [49] Clinical application of machine learning models in patients with prostate cancer before prostatectomy
    Guerra, Adalgisa
    Orton, Matthew R.
    Wang, Helen
    Konidari, Marianna
    Maes, Kris
    Papanikolaou, Nickolas K.
    Koh, Dow Mu
    [J]. CANCER IMAGING, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [50] Application of Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Bone Metastasis in Patients with Prostate Cancer
    Liu, Wen-Cai
    Li, Ming-Xuan
    Qian, Wen-Xing
    Luo, Zhi-Wen
    Liao, Wei-Jie
    Liu, Zhi-Li
    Liu, Jia-Ming
    [J]. CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2021, 13 : 8723 - 8736