Treatment prediction with machine learning in prostate cancer patients

被引:2
|
作者
Alatas, Emre [1 ,2 ]
Kokkulunk, Handan Tanyildizi [3 ]
Tanyildizi, Hilal [4 ,5 ]
Alcin, Goksel [6 ]
机构
[1] Beykent Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Management Informat Syst, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Kadir Has Univ, Inst Sci & Technol, Management Informat Syst, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Altinbas Univ, Vocat Sch Hlth Serv, Radiotherapy Program, Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Beykent Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Int Trade & Finance, Istanbul, Turkiye
[5] Istanbul Univ, Inst Social Sci, Business Adm, Istanbul, Turkiye
[6] Istanbul Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Prostate cancer; support vector machine; random forest; decision tree; machine learning;
D O I
10.1080/10255842.2023.2298364
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
There are various treatment modalities for prostate cancer, which has a high incidence. In this study, it is aimed to make predictions with machine learning in order to determine the optimal treatment option for prostate cancer patients. The study included 88 male patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. Independent variables were determined as Gleason scores, biopsy, PSA, SUVmax, and age. Prostate cancer treatments, which are dependent variables, were determined as hormone therapy(n = 30), radiotherapy(n = 28) and radiotherapy + hormone therapy(n = 30). Machine learning was carried out in the Python with SVM, RF, DT, ETC and XGBoost. Metrics such as accuracy, ROC curve, and AUC were used to evaluate the performance of multi-class predictions. The model with the highest number of successful predictions was the XGBoost. False negative rates for hormone therapy, radiotherapy, and radiotherapy + hormone therapy treatments were, respectively, 12.5, 33.3, and 0%. The accuracy values were computed as 0.61, 0.83, 0.83, 0.72 and 0.89 for SVM, RF, DT, ETC and XGBoost, respectively. The three features that had the greatest influence on the treatment model prediction for prostate cancer with XGBoost were biopsy, Gleason score (3 + 3), and PSA level, respectively. According to the AUC, ROC and accuracy, it was determined that the XGBoost was the model that made the best estimation of prostate cancer treatment. Among the variables biopsy, Gleason score, and PSA level are identified as key variables in prediction of treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Machine Learning for the Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Prostate Cancer
    Sabbagh, A.
    Washington, S., III
    Tilki, D.
    Hong, J. C.
    Feng, J.
    Chen, M. H.
    Wu, J.
    Huland, H.
    Graefen, M.
    Wiegel, T.
    Boehmer, D.
    Cowan, J.
    Cooperberg, M. R.
    Feng, F. Y.
    Trock, B.
    Partin, A. W.
    DAmico, A. V.
    Carroll, P.
    Mohamad, O.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 114 (03): : S47 - S48
  • [2] Prostate Cancer Probability Prediction By Machine Learning Technique
    Jovic, Srdan
    Miljkovic, Milica
    Ivanovic, Miljan
    Saranovic, Milena
    Arsic, Milena
    [J]. CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2017, 35 (10) : 647 - 651
  • [3] Prediction System for Prostate Cancer Recurrence Using Machine Learning
    Lee, Sun Jung
    Yu, Sung Hye
    Kim, Yejin
    Kim, Jae Kwon
    Hong, Jun Hyuk
    Kim, Choung-Soo
    Seo, Seong Il
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Jeong, Chang Wook
    Lee, Ji Youl
    Choi, In Young
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (04):
  • [4] Prediction of Prostate Cancer using Ensemble of Machine Learning Techniques
    Oyewo, O. A.
    Boyinbode, O. K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 11 (03) : 149 - 154
  • [5] Prediction of Cancer Treatment Using Advancements in Machine Learning
    Singh, Arun Kumar
    Ling, Jingjing
    Malviya, Rishabha
    [J]. RECENT PATENTS ON ANTI-CANCER DRUG DISCOVERY, 2023, 18 (03) : 364 - 378
  • [6] Machine learning and treatment outcome prediction for oral cancer
    Chu, Chui S.
    Lee, Nikki P.
    Adeoye, John
    Thomson, Peter
    Choi, Siu-Wai
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL PATHOLOGY & MEDICINE, 2020, 49 (10) : 977 - 985
  • [7] Treatment Stratification of Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer by Machine Learning
    Deng, Kaiwen
    Li, Hongyang
    Guan, Yuanfang
    [J]. ISCIENCE, 2020, 23 (02)
  • [8] COMPARISION OF FOUR MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES FOR THE PREDICTION OF PROSTATE CANCER SURVIVABILITY
    Wen, Huaiyu
    Li, Sufang
    Li, Wei
    Li, Jianping
    Yin, Chang
    [J]. 2018 15TH INTERNATIONAL COMPUTER CONFERENCE ON WAVELET ACTIVE MEDIA TECHNOLOGY AND INFORMATION PROCESSING (ICCWAMTIP), 2018, : 112 - 116
  • [9] Interpretation of machine learning methods for the prediction of breast and prostate cancer risk
    Klie, Adam
    Talwar, James
    Pagadala, Meghana
    Carter, Hannah
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 82 (12)
  • [10] Clinically Consistent Prostate Cancer Outcome Prediction Models with Machine Learning
    Vallon, J. J.
    Panjwani, N.
    Ling, X.
    Vij, S.
    Pollom, E.
    Bagshaw, H. P.
    Srinivas, S.
    Leppert, J.
    Bayati, M.
    Buyyounouski, M. K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 114 (03): : E126 - E127