Postoperative rehabilitation versus early mobilization following scoliosis surgery: A single-blind randomized clinical trial

被引:3
|
作者
Bazancir, Zilan [1 ,4 ]
Talu, Burcu [2 ]
Korkmaz, Mehmet Fatih [3 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Phys Therapy & Rehabil, Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Inonu Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Malatya, Turkiye
[3] Istanbul Medeniyet Univ, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Hacet tepe Univ, Fac Phys Therapy & Rehabil, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; POSTERIOR SPINAL-FUSION; EARLY DISCHARGE; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; BALANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jos.2021.11.017
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: To compare the effect of five days of intensive postoperative rehabilitation and early mobilization following scoliosis surgery.Methods: Forty adolescent patients who had undergone scoliosis surgery were randomly allocated into a rehabilitation group (RG, n = 20) and a mobilization group (MG, n = 20). The RG received five days of intensive exercise program and early ambulation, the MG received five days of a standard gait training and early ambulation. The patients were evaluated for severity of pain using a visual analog scale, thorax mobility with the thoracic mobility index, balance with the functional reach test, walking distance with the 2-min walk test, and quality of life with the Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire. The length of hospital stay was recorded.Results: The RG was favored over the MG for improvements from 0 to 1 week for pain. Improvements from 0 to 1 week were significantly better in the RG than the MG group for thorax mobility, balance, and walking distance. Quality of life scores improvements from 0 to 1 week were significantly better in the RG group than in the MG group. The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RG group. Conclusion: Five days of intensive postoperative rehabilitation were superior to early mobilization in reducing the length of hospital stay, and in improving physical and functional outcomes following scoliosis surgery.(c) 2021 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:308 / 314
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of hydroxychloroquine on treatment and recurrence of acute brucellosis: a single-blind, randomized clinical trial
    Majzoobi, Mohammad Mahdi
    Hashemi, Seyyed Hamid
    Mamani, Mojgan
    Keramat, Fariba
    Poorolajal, Jalal
    Basir, Hamid Reza Ghasemi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2018, 51 (03) : 365 - 369
  • [42] Effect of frequent laser irradiation on orthodontic pain A single-blind randomized clinical trial
    Kim, Won Tae
    Bayome, Mohamed
    Park, Jun-Beom
    Park, Jae Hyun
    Baek, Seung-Hak
    Kook, Yoon-Ah
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2013, 83 (04) : 611 - 616
  • [43] The effectiveness of two different exercise approaches in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A single-blind, randomized-controlled trial
    Kocaman, Hikmet
    Bek, Nilgun
    Kaya, Mehmet Hanifi
    Buyukturan, Buket
    Yetis, Mehmet
    Buyukturan, Oznur
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (04):
  • [44] Citalopram versus fluoxetine for the treatment of patients with bulimia nervosa: A single-blind randomized controlled trial
    Paolo Leombruni
    Federico Amianto
    Nadia Delsedime
    Carla Gramaglia
    Giovanni Abbate-Daga
    Secondo Fassino
    Advances in Therapy, 2006, 23 : 481 - 494
  • [45] Colorectal liver metastases: surgery versus thermal ablation (COLLISION) – a phase III single-blind prospective randomized controlled trial
    Robbert S. Puijk
    Alette H. Ruarus
    Laurien G. P. H. Vroomen
    Aukje A. J. M. van Tilborg
    Hester J. Scheffer
    Karin Nielsen
    Marcus C. de Jong
    Jan J. J. de Vries
    Babs M. Zonderhuis
    Hasan H. Eker
    Geert Kazemier
    Henk Verheul
    Bram B. van der Meijs
    Laura van Dam
    Natasha Sorgedrager
    Veerle M. H. Coupé
    Petrousjka M. P. van den Tol
    Martijn R. Meijerink
    BMC Cancer, 18
  • [46] Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease:: A prospective randomized single-blind trial
    Gervaz, P.
    Morel, P.
    Inan, I.
    Bucher, P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 94 (06) : 762 - 763
  • [47] Colorectal liver metastases: surgery versus thermal ablation (COLLISION) - a phase III single-blind prospective randomized controlled trial
    Puijk, Robbert S.
    Ruarus, Alette H.
    Vroomen, Laurien G. P. H.
    van Tilborg, Aukje A. J. M.
    Scheffer, Hester J.
    Nielsen, Karin
    de Jong, Marcus C.
    de Vries, Jan J. J.
    Zonderhuis, Babs M.
    Eker, Hasan H.
    Kazemier, Geert
    Verheul, Henk
    van der Meijs, Bram B.
    van Dam, Laura
    Sorgedrager, Natasha
    Coupe, Veerle M. H.
    van den Tol, Petrousjka M. P.
    Meijerink, Martijn R.
    BMC CANCER, 2018, 18
  • [48] Citalopram versus fluoxetine for the treatment of patients with bulimia nervosa: A single-blind randomized controlled trial
    Leombruni, Paolo
    Amianto, Federico
    Delsedime, Nadia
    Gramaglia, Carla
    Abbate-Daga, Giovanni
    Fassino, Secondo
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2006, 23 (03) : 481 - 494
  • [49] Mirabegron versus Solifenacin in Children with Overactive Bladder: Prospective Randomized Single-Blind Controlled Trial
    Soliman, Mohamed G.
    El-Abd, Shawky
    El-Gamal, Osama M.
    Raheem, Ali Abdel
    Abou-Ramadan, Ahmed R.
    El-Abd, Ahmed S.
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2021, 105 (11-12) : 1011 - 1017
  • [50] Electromagnetic field versus diclofenac drugs on primary dysmenorrhea: A single-blind randomized controlled trial
    El Refaye, Ghada Ebrahim
    Botla, Afaf Mohamed
    Hussein, Hossam Al-Din
    Hamada, Hamada Ahmed
    Wadee, Amir N.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND ANALYTICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 10 (02) : 202 - 206