Patient versus physician preferences for lipid-lowering drug therapy: A discrete choice experiment

被引:2
|
作者
Zhang, Lingli [1 ]
Chen, Jiali [2 ]
Cao, Zhaoliu [3 ]
Zhang, Mengdie [1 ]
Ma, Rui [1 ]
Zhang, Pei [1 ]
Yao, Guiqing [4 ,5 ]
Li, Xin [1 ,2 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Sch Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Regulatory Sci & Pharmacoecon, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Dept Hlth Policy, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing City Qixia Dist Hosp, Dept Pharm, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Leicester, Coll Life Sci, Dept Cardiovasc Sci, Leicester, England
[5] Univ Leicester, Coll Life Sci, Leicester Clin Trial Unit, Leicester, England
[6] Nanjing Med Univ, Ctr Global Hlth, Sch Publ Hlth, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[7] Nanjing Med Univ, Sch Pharm, 101 Longmian Ave, Nanjing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
discrete choice experiment; lipid-lowering drug; preferences;
D O I
10.1111/hex.14043
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The emergence of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors offered dyslipidemia patients an alternative to statins for lipid-lowering treatment. Understanding patient and physician preferences for lipid-lowering drugs may promote shared decision-making and improve treatment outcomes. Methods: This study utilized an online discrete choice experiment (DCE) to assess the relative importance (RI) of six attributes related to lipid-lowering drugs, including frequency of administration, mode of administration, reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level, risk of myopathy, risk of liver damage, and out-of-pocket monthly cost. Respondents were recruited from dyslipidemia patients and cardiovascular physicians in China. A mixed logit model and latent class analysis were employed to estimate the preference coefficient, marginal willingness to pay (mWTP), and RI of attributes. Ethical approval has been obtained for this study. Results: A total of 708 patients and 507 physicians participated in the survey. Patients prioritized the 'risk of liver damage' (RI = 23.6%) with 'mode of administration' (RI = 19.2%) and 'frequency of administration' (RI = 18.8%) following closely. Contrarily, physicians prioritized the 'reduction of LDL-C level' (RI = 33.5%), followed by 'risk of liver damage' (RI = 26.0%) and 'risk of myopathy' (RI = 16.1%). Patients placed a higher value on 'frequency of administration' (p < .001) and 'mode of administration' (p < .001) compared to physicians, while physicians valued 'reduction of LDL-C level' (p < .001) and 'risk of myopathy' (p = .012) more than patients. Physicians exhibited higher mWTP than patients for all attributes except frequency and mode of administration. The LCA revealed three distinct patient classes: focus on oral administration, focus on hepatic safety and frequency and focus on hepatic safety and cost. Likewise, three physician classes were identified: frequency-insensitive, efficacy-focused and safety-focused. Conclusions: The preferences for lipid-lowering drug therapy differed between patients and physicians in China. Physicians should take into account patients' preferences and provide personalized treatment when they formulate lipid-lowering treatment plans. Patient or Public Contribution: Patients participated in the questionnaire design process. They engaged in a focus group discussion to determine attributes and levels and also participated in a pilot survey to assess the comprehensibility of the questionnaires. Additionally, patients were involved in the DCE survey to express their preferences. The findings of patient preference for lipid-lowering drug therapy will promote shared decision-making and optimize the treatment regimen.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient preferences for osteoporosis in Spain: a discrete choice experiment
    Darba, J.
    Restovic, G.
    Kaskens, L.
    Balbona, M. A.
    Carbonell, A.
    Cavero, P.
    Jordana, M.
    Prieto, C.
    Molina, A.
    Padro, I.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 22 (06) : 1947 - 1954
  • [42] PATIENT PREFERENCES IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA: A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT
    Tervonen, T.
    Duenas, A.
    Collacott, H.
    Lam, A.
    Gries, K. S.
    Carson, R.
    Trevor, N.
    Krucien, N.
    He, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (07) : S299 - S299
  • [43] Patients' Preferences in Anticoagulant Therapy Discrete Choice Experiment
    Najafzadeh, Mehdi
    Gagne, Joshua J.
    Choudhry, Niteesh K.
    Polinski, Jennifer M.
    Avorn, Jerry
    Schneeweiss, Sebastian S.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2014, 7 (06): : 912 - 919
  • [44] LIPID-LOWERING THERAPY IN PERSPECTIVE
    THOMPSON, GR
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 1988, 42 (02): : 61 - 64
  • [45] The Future of Lipid-Lowering Therapy
    van Zwol, Willemien
    Rimbert, Antoine
    Kuivenhoven, Jan Albert
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (07)
  • [46] Lipid-Lowering Drug Therapy for CVD Prevention: Looking into the Future
    Stein, Evan A.
    Raal, Frederick J.
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2015, 17 (11)
  • [47] Patient preferences for maintenance therapy in Crohn's disease: A discrete-choice experiment
    Hazlewood, Glen S.
    Pokharel, Gyanendra
    Deardon, Robert
    Marshall, Deborah A.
    Bombardier, Claire
    Tomlinson, George
    Ma, Christopher
    Seow, Cynthia H.
    Panaccione, Remo
    Kaplan, Gilaad G.
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (01):
  • [48] Lipid-Lowering Drug Therapy for CVD Prevention: Looking into the Future
    Evan A. Stein
    Frederick J. Raal
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2015, 17
  • [49] General Population vs. Patient Preferences in Anticoagulant Therapy: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Mehdi Najafzadeh
    Sebastian Schneeweiss
    Niteesh K. Choudhry
    Jerry Avorn
    Joshua J. Gagne
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2019, 12 : 235 - 246
  • [50] Line of Therapy and Patient Preferences Treating Lung Cancer: A Discrete-Choice Experiment
    Bridges, J.
    Roy, U. Basu
    Janssen, E.
    Ferris, A.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 13 (10) : S378 - S379