Pneumatic Retinopexy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment in Elderly Patients

被引:5
|
作者
Shor, Reut [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Melo, Isabela Martins [1 ,2 ]
Motekalem, Yasmin [3 ]
Zajner, Chris [4 ]
Muni, Rajeev H. [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Ophthalmol & Vis Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] St Michaels Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Unity Hlth Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Western Univ, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Kensington Vis & Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] St Michaels Hosp, 8th Floor,Donnelly Wing,30 Bond St, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
来源
OPHTHALMOLOGY RETINA | 2023年 / 7卷 / 11期
关键词
Clinical settings outcomes; Elderly; Pars plana vitrectomy; Pneumatic retinopexy; Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; VITRECTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.oret.2023.07.010
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess clinical outcomes in elderly patients aged > 75 years who underwent pneumatic retinopexy (PnR) for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).Subjects: Patients aged >= 75 years with primary RRD undergoing PnR. Methods: This study evaluates clinical outcomes among eligible patients who presented from October 1, 2010, to December 31, 2022, with a minimum of 3 months' follow-up. There were no limitations with respect to the number, size, or location of retinal breaks. Exclusion criteria included significant proliferative vitreoretinopathy or previous retinal detachment repair in the index eye, inability to maintain the postoperative posturing requirements or inability to carry out adequate examination of the peripheral retina because of media opacity. Lens status did not impact the decision to offer PnR. Main Outcome Measures: Pneumatic retinopexy primary anatomic reattachment rate and postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 3 months.Results: Eighty patients with a mean age of 80.6 +/- 4.6 years were included in this study; 35% (28/80) were phakic and 34% (27/80) presented with a fovea-on RRD. The mean number of breaks in the detached retina was 1.52 +/- 1.13, and the mean number of quadrants of detached retina was 2.35 +/- 0.93. The primary anatomic reattachment rate at 3 months after PnR was 78.8% (63/80), whereas the remaining 21.2% (17/80) failed PnR and underwent an operating room procedure. There was a statistically significant improvement in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) BCVA from baseline to 3 months (1.29 +/- 0.94 and 0.69 +/- 0.67, respectively, P < 0.001). A subgroup analysis that only included patients aged > 80 years was also performed, with a total of 39 patients with a mean age of 84.4 +/- 3.5 years. The primary anatomic reattachment rate with PnR in this subgroup was 74.4% (29/39), with a statistically significant improvement in BCVA from baseline to 3 months (1.4 +/- 1.05 and 0.77 +/- 0.70, respectively; P = 0.004).Conclusions: Elderly patients treated with PnR for primary RRD had relatively comparable primary anatomic reattachment rates with other surgical techniques such as pars plana vitrectomy and scleral buckle. Pneumatic retinopexy is an effective, minimally invasive office-based procedure that may be desirable for some elderly patients.
引用
收藏
页码:959 / 964
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of pneumatic retinopexy and scleral buckling in the management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment - Reply
    Han, DP
    Hartz, A
    Guse, CE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 127 (06) : 742 - 743
  • [42] Cost Analysis of Pneumatic Retinopexy versus Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
    Elhusseiny, Abdelrahman M.
    Yannuzzi, Nicolas A.
    Smiddy, William E.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY RETINA, 2019, 3 (11): : 956 - 961
  • [43] Pneumatic retinopexy outcomes as primary or secondary surgical option for treating rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
    Dhami, Abhinav
    Shah, Kunal Kaushik
    Ratra, Dhanashree
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 66 (03) : 420 - 425
  • [44] Surgical Success and Functional Outcomes of Failed Pneumatic Retinopexy for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
    Mammo, Zaid
    Martens, Rosanna
    Merkur, Andrew
    Kirker, Andrew
    Albiani, David
    De Moraes, C. Gustavo
    Chang, Stanley
    Maberley, David
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2018, 59 (09)
  • [45] Comparative study of vitrectomy, pneumatic retinopexy, and scleral buckling for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
    BeltranLoustaunau, MA
    Troconis, D
    MoralesCanton, V
    OchoaContreras, D
    DalmaWeiszhausz, J
    JimenezSierra, JM
    PaczkaZapata, JA
    Martinez, JJ
    QuirozMercado, H
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1997, 38 (04) : 3156 - 3156
  • [46] Efficacy of Pneumatic Retinopexy versus Vitrectomy with Scieral Buckle in Repairing Uncomplicated Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
    Li, Deborah
    Szanto, David
    White, Emily R.
    Fazio, Nicholas
    Chaudhary, Khurram
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2024, 65 (07)
  • [47] Scleral buckling with adjuvant pneumatic retinopexy versus scleral buckling alone for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
    Jung, Young Hoon
    Park, Kyu Hyung
    Woo, Se Joon
    Joo, Kwangsic
    Kim, Min Seok
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [48] Scleral buckling with adjuvant pneumatic retinopexy versus scleral buckling alone for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
    Young Hoon Jung
    Kyu Hyung Park
    Se Joon Woo
    Kwangsic Joo
    Min Seok Kim
    Scientific Reports, 14
  • [49] Pneumatic Retinopexy for the Repair of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis
    Fabian, Ido D.
    Kinori, Michael
    Efrati, Michal
    Alhalel, Amir
    Desatnik, Howard
    Hai, Orit Vidne
    Katz, Gabriel
    Platner, Eva
    Moisseiev, Joseph
    JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 131 (02) : 166 - 171
  • [50] Comparison of pneumatic retinopexy versus scleral buckling in the management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD)
    Han, DP
    Mohsin, N
    Guse, CE
    Hartz, AJ
    Tarkanian, C
    Wolf, MD
    Sramek, SJ
    Mieler, WF
    Pulido, JS
    Connor, TB
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1997, 38 (04) : 2228 - 2228