Value of psychosocial evaluation for left ventricular assist device candidates

被引:2
|
作者
Olt, Caroline K. [1 ]
Thuita, Lucy W. [2 ]
Soltesz, Edward G. [3 ,4 ]
Tong, Michael Z. [3 ,4 ]
Weiss, Aaron J. [3 ]
Kendall, Kay
Estep, Jerry D. [3 ,4 ]
Blackstone, Eugene H. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Hsich, Eileen M. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Cleveland, OH USA
[2] Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Heart & Vasc Inst, Cleveland, OH USA
[4] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Cleveland Clin, Lerner Coll Med, Cleveland, OH USA
[5] Transplant Ctr, Cleveland, OH USA
来源
关键词
hospital readmissions; heart transplantation; mechanical circulatory support; outcome assessment; SIPAT; RISK-FACTORS; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; SOCIETY; SIPAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.04.065
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Left ventricular assist devices require a psychosocial assessment to deter-mine candidacy despite limited data correlating with outcome. Our objective is to determine whether the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant, a tool validated for transplant and widely used by left ventricular assist device programs, predicts left ventricular assist device program hospital readmissions and death. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of adults at the Cleveland Clinic with Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant scores before primary left ventricular assist device program implantation from April 1, 2013, to December 31, 2018. The primary outcome was unplanned hospital readmissions censored at death, trans-plantation, and transfer of care. The secondary outcome was death. Results: There were 263 patients in the left ventricular assist device program with a median (Q1, Q3) Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant score of 16 (8, 28). During a median follow-up 1.2 years, 56 died, 65 underwent transplan-tation, and 21 had transferred care. There were 640 unplanned hospital readmis-sions among 250 patients with at least 1 outpatient visit at our center. In a multivariable analysis, Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant components but not total Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Trans-plant score was associated with readmissions. Psychopathology (Stanford Inte-grated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant C-IX) was associated with hemocompatibility (coefficient 0.21 +/- standard error 0.11, P = .040) and cardiac (0.15 +/- 0.065, P = .02) readmissions. Patient readiness was associated with noncar-diac (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant A-III, 0.24 +/- 0.099, P = .016) and cardiac (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant A-low total, 0.037 +/- 0.014, P = .007) readmissions. Poor living envi-ronment (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant B-VIII) was associated with device-related readmissions (0.83 +/- 0.34, P = .014). Death was associated with organic psychopathology or neurocognitive impairment (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant C-X, 0.59 +/- 0.21, P = .006). onclusions: Total Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant score was not associated with left ventricular assist device program readmission or mortality. However, we identified certain Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant components that were associated with outcome and could be used to create a left ventricular assist device program specific psychoso-cial tool. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023;165:1111-21)
引用
收藏
页码:1111 / +
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Psychosocial Evaluation of Candidates for Heart Transplant and Ventricular Assist Devices Beyond the Current Consensus
    Bui, Quan M.
    Allen, Larry A.
    LeMond, Lisa
    Brambatti, Michela
    Adler, Eric
    CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2019, 12 (07)
  • [32] Treatment of Ventricular Assist Device Thrombus by Implantation of an Additional Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Ricklefs, Marcel
    Hanke, Jasmin S.
    Schmitto, Jan D.
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2018, 42 (04) : 464 - 465
  • [33] Left Ventricular Assist Device in Pregnancy
    LaRue, Shane
    Shanks, Anthony
    Wang, I-wen
    Ewald, Gregory
    Anderson, Diane
    Joseph, Susan
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (02): : 426 - 428
  • [34] Current Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Chusri, Yanee
    Diloksumpan, Paweena
    Naiyanetr, Phornphop
    6TH BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE (BMEICON 2013), 2013,
  • [35] Left ventricular assist device.
    Vilchez, RA
    Kormos, R
    Kusne, S
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (13): : 1023 - 1024
  • [36] CARDIORESPONSIVE LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE
    Abadeer, A.
    Putnins, M.
    Badach, J.
    Kamdar, P.
    Yang, M.
    2013 39TH ANNUAL NORTHEAST BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE (NEBEC 2013), 2013, : 255 - 256
  • [37] Left ventricular assist device - an update
    Florian, A.
    Machler, H.
    Renz, D.
    Zimpfer, D.
    JOURNAL FUR KARDIOLOGIE, 2022, 29 (9-10): : 258 - 262
  • [38] Left ventricular assist device for everybody?
    Loardi, Claudia Maria
    Zanobini, Marco
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 57 (04) : 810 - 810
  • [39] Biologisation of the Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Guentner, H.
    Katsirntaki, K.
    Pflaum, M.
    Haverich, A.
    Wiegmann, B.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 40 (04): : S300 - S300
  • [40] Endocarditis in left ventricular assist device
    Thyagarajan, Braghadheeswar
    Kumar, Monisha Priyadarshini
    Sikachi, Rutuja R.
    Agrawal, Abhinav
    INTRACTABLE & RARE DISEASES RESEARCH, 2016, 5 (03) : 177 - 184