Value of psychosocial evaluation for left ventricular assist device candidates

被引:2
|
作者
Olt, Caroline K. [1 ]
Thuita, Lucy W. [2 ]
Soltesz, Edward G. [3 ,4 ]
Tong, Michael Z. [3 ,4 ]
Weiss, Aaron J. [3 ]
Kendall, Kay
Estep, Jerry D. [3 ,4 ]
Blackstone, Eugene H. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Hsich, Eileen M. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Cleveland, OH USA
[2] Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Heart & Vasc Inst, Cleveland, OH USA
[4] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Cleveland Clin, Lerner Coll Med, Cleveland, OH USA
[5] Transplant Ctr, Cleveland, OH USA
来源
关键词
hospital readmissions; heart transplantation; mechanical circulatory support; outcome assessment; SIPAT; RISK-FACTORS; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; SOCIETY; SIPAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.04.065
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Left ventricular assist devices require a psychosocial assessment to deter-mine candidacy despite limited data correlating with outcome. Our objective is to determine whether the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant, a tool validated for transplant and widely used by left ventricular assist device programs, predicts left ventricular assist device program hospital readmissions and death. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of adults at the Cleveland Clinic with Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant scores before primary left ventricular assist device program implantation from April 1, 2013, to December 31, 2018. The primary outcome was unplanned hospital readmissions censored at death, trans-plantation, and transfer of care. The secondary outcome was death. Results: There were 263 patients in the left ventricular assist device program with a median (Q1, Q3) Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant score of 16 (8, 28). During a median follow-up 1.2 years, 56 died, 65 underwent transplan-tation, and 21 had transferred care. There were 640 unplanned hospital readmis-sions among 250 patients with at least 1 outpatient visit at our center. In a multivariable analysis, Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant components but not total Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Trans-plant score was associated with readmissions. Psychopathology (Stanford Inte-grated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant C-IX) was associated with hemocompatibility (coefficient 0.21 +/- standard error 0.11, P = .040) and cardiac (0.15 +/- 0.065, P = .02) readmissions. Patient readiness was associated with noncar-diac (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant A-III, 0.24 +/- 0.099, P = .016) and cardiac (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant A-low total, 0.037 +/- 0.014, P = .007) readmissions. Poor living envi-ronment (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant B-VIII) was associated with device-related readmissions (0.83 +/- 0.34, P = .014). Death was associated with organic psychopathology or neurocognitive impairment (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant C-X, 0.59 +/- 0.21, P = .006). onclusions: Total Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant score was not associated with left ventricular assist device program readmission or mortality. However, we identified certain Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant components that were associated with outcome and could be used to create a left ventricular assist device program specific psychoso-cial tool. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023;165:1111-21)
引用
收藏
页码:1111 / +
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Serum cytokines in left ventricular assist device candidates
    Birks, EJ
    Khaghani, A
    Bowles, C
    Hunt, D
    Pepper, JR
    Banner, NR
    Yacoub, MH
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (1-2) : 1974 - 1975
  • [2] Commentary: Bringing objectivity to the nonmedical evaluation of left ventricular assist device candidates
    Mancini, Donna
    Moss, Noah
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 165 (03): : 1123 - 1124
  • [3] Predicting Function: The Value of Preoperative OT Evaluations for Left Ventricular Assist Device Candidates
    Cannone, Kellie
    Wong, John
    McInnis, Lauren
    Begin, Abigail
    Dittrich, Marissa
    Donovan, Erin E.
    Beatty, Kimberly
    Lam, Nicole C.
    Taubert, Alyssa M.
    Asiello, Jessica
    Kelley, Christina M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2024, 78
  • [4] Assessment of Right Ventricular Function in Left Ventricular Assist Device Candidates
    Hayek, Salim
    Sims, Daniel B.
    Markham, David W.
    Butler, Javed
    Kalogeropoulos, Andreas P.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2014, 7 (02) : 379 - 389
  • [5] Successful conservative management of left ventricular assist device candidates
    Havakuk, Ofer
    Hochstadt, Aviram
    Sadon, Sapir
    Perl, Michal Laurel
    Sadeh, Ben
    Milwidsky, Assi
    Sapir, Orly Ran
    Granot, Yoav
    Lupu, Lior
    Levi, Erez
    Farkash, Ariel
    Ben Gal, Yanai
    Banai, Shmuel
    Topilsky, Yan
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2023, 10 (01): : 601 - 615
  • [6] Evaluation of the quality of life and of psychosocial factors during left ventricular assist device support
    Piccari, R.
    Bartolini, S.
    Franchini, M.
    De Lio, L.
    Cottini, M.
    Sampieri, E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2017, 16 : S26 - S26
  • [7] Psychosocial Factors and Outcomes with Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy
    Lundgren, S.
    High, R.
    Poon, C.
    Raichlin, E.
    Zolty, R.
    Burdorf, A.
    Um, J.
    Lowes, B.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 36 (04): : S338 - S338
  • [8] Prognostic Value of the Nutritional Risk Index in Candidates for Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy
    Uribarri, A.
    Rojas, S. V.
    Hanke, J. S.
    Dogan, G.
    Siemeni, T.
    Kaufeld, T.
    Goecke, T.
    Rojas-Hernandez, S.
    Warnecke, G.
    Bara, C.
    Avsar, M.
    Schmitto, J. D.
    Haverich, A.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 37 (04): : S463 - S464
  • [9] Prognostic Value of the Nutritional Risk Index in Candidates for Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy
    Uribarri, Aitor
    Rojas, Sebastian, V
    Hanke, Jasmin S.
    Dogan, Guenes
    Siemeni, Thierry
    Kaufeld, Tim
    Ius, Fabio
    Goecke, Tobias
    Rojas-Hernandez, Sara
    Warnecke, Gregor
    Bara, Christoph
    Avsar, Murat
    Haverich, Axel
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2019, 72 (08): : 608 - 615
  • [10] Psychosocial Evaluation before Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Can Predict Device Complication during Support
    Uriel, N.
    Gukasyan, N.
    Pak, S. W.
    George, G.
    Westfal, E.
    Flannery, M.
    Gonzales-Costello, J.
    Sims, D. B.
    Colombo, P. C.
    Mancini, D.
    Takayama, H.
    Naka, Y.
    Jorde, U. P.
    Shapiro, P. A.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 30 (04): : S71 - S71