Co-benefits of carbon sink and low carbon food supply via shellfish and algae farming in China from 2003 to 2020

被引:9
|
作者
Le, Chen-Yao [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Feng, Jing-Chun [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Sun, Liwei [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yuan, Weiyu [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wu, Guozhong [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Si [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yang, Zhifeng [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Technol, Res Ctr Ecol & Environm Coastal Area & Deep Sea, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Marine Sci & Engn Guangdong Lab Guangzhou, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Marine Sci & Engn Guangdong Lab Guangzhou, Guangzhou 511458, Peoples R China
[4] Guangdong Univ Technol, Sch Ecol Environm & Resources, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Negative emission technology; Carbon sink; Mariculture; Driving factor; Decoupling analysis; EU; AQUACULTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137436
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Innovative strategies for effective carbon emission reduction play an important role to limit global warming to less than 1.5 degrees C. Mariculture of shellfish and algae has double benefits of obtaining food with a low-carbon footprint and sequestrating carbon during the natural process. This work estimated the co-benefits of low carbon food supply and carbon sequestration via shellfish and algae farming in China. Spatiotemporal evolution, driving factors, and decoupling status of shellfish and algae farming from 2003 to 2020 were comprehensively analyzed. Results showed that approximately 6.0 Mt CO2-eq yr  1 were sequestrated in China from 2003 to 2020 via shellfish and algae farming. Shellfish farming could reduce carbon emissions by 31.7 Mt CO2-eq yr  1 by providing 0.39 Mt yr  1 of highly-quality protein when compared to beef production. Moreover, algae farming could reduce the carbon emissions of 0.7 Mt CO2-eq yr  1 by providing 1.6 Mt yr  1 edible food (vegetable) when compared to beet production. The increasing marine fishery economy and farming capacity are the main driving factors for the continuously improving CO2 sequestration capacity of shellfish and algae during 2003-2020. These two driving factors increased carbon sink by 10.35 Mt CO2-eq from 2003 to 2020 accordingly. However, farming area efficiency had a mainly negative effect on the carbon sink with a total 6.94 Mt CO2-eq reduction. In general, China's shellfish and algae farming values account for only a small proportion of the marine fishery value, requiring robust incentive strategies, such as government subsidies and blue carbon trading, to improve carbon sink capacity in China.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Health Effects of Energy Intensive Sectors and the Potential Health Co-Benefits of a Low Carbon Industrial Transition in China
    Yang, Tingru
    Liu, Wenling
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (17)
  • [22] Public willingness to pay for carbon farming and its co-benefits (vol 126, pg 125, 2016)
    Kragt, M. E.
    Gibson, F. L.
    Maseyk, F.
    Wilson, K. A.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 149 : 306 - 306
  • [23] Optimal straw management co-benefits crop yield and soil carbon sequestration of intensive farming systems
    Wang, Liang
    Wang, Enli
    Qian, Xin
    Gao, Yingbo
    Zhang, Hui
    Li, Zongxin
    Liu, Kaichang
    [J]. LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 34 (08) : 2322 - 2333
  • [24] Analysis of Air Quality and Health Co-Benefits under Low Carbon Pathway in Taiwan
    Lai, Hsin-Chih
    Chung, Shih-Ming
    Li, Li-Ling
    Lin, Wen-Yinn
    Hsiao, Min-Chuan
    [J]. AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (07)
  • [25] Promoting co-benefits of carbon farming in Oceania: Applying and adapting approaches and metrics from existing market-based schemes
    Baumber, Alex
    Metternicht, Graciela
    Cross, Rebecca
    Ruoso, Laure-Elise
    Cowie, Annette L.
    Waters, Cathleen
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 39
  • [26] ASSESSMENT OF ENERGY SECURITY AND CO-BENEFITS OF LOW-CARBON SOCIETY SCENARIOS IN THAILAND
    Selvakkumaran, Sujeetha
    Limmeechokchai, Bundit
    [J]. SURANAREE JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 19 (02): : 61 - 78
  • [27] Cheap carbon and biodiversity co-benefits from forest regeneration in a hotspot of endemism
    Gilroy, James J.
    Woodcock, Paul
    Edwards, Felicity A.
    Wheeler, Charlotte
    Baptiste, Brigitte L. G.
    Uribe, Claudia A. Medina
    Haugaasen, Torbjorn
    Edwards, David P.
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2014, 4 (06) : 503 - 507
  • [28] Cheap carbon and biodiversity co-benefits from forest regeneration in a hotspot of endemism
    Gilroy J.J.
    Woodcock P.
    Edwards F.A.
    Wheeler C.
    Baptiste B.L.G.
    Medina Uribe C.A.
    Haugaasen T.
    Edwards D.P.
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2014, 4 (6) : 503 - 507
  • [29] Life cycle assessment demonstrates environmental co-benefits and trade-offs of low-carbon electricity supply options
    Gibon, Thomas
    Arvesen, Anders
    Hertwich, Edgar G.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 76 : 1283 - 1290
  • [30] Analysing co-benefits of the energy conservation and carbon reduction in China's large commercial buildings
    Jiang, Ping
    Dong, Wenbo
    Kung, YiHsiu
    Geng, Yong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 58 : 112 - 120