Co-benefits of carbon sink and low carbon food supply via shellfish and algae farming in China from 2003 to 2020

被引:9
|
作者
Le, Chen-Yao [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Feng, Jing-Chun [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Sun, Liwei [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yuan, Weiyu [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wu, Guozhong [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Si [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yang, Zhifeng [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Technol, Res Ctr Ecol & Environm Coastal Area & Deep Sea, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Marine Sci & Engn Guangdong Lab Guangzhou, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Marine Sci & Engn Guangdong Lab Guangzhou, Guangzhou 511458, Peoples R China
[4] Guangdong Univ Technol, Sch Ecol Environm & Resources, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Negative emission technology; Carbon sink; Mariculture; Driving factor; Decoupling analysis; EU; AQUACULTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137436
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Innovative strategies for effective carbon emission reduction play an important role to limit global warming to less than 1.5 degrees C. Mariculture of shellfish and algae has double benefits of obtaining food with a low-carbon footprint and sequestrating carbon during the natural process. This work estimated the co-benefits of low carbon food supply and carbon sequestration via shellfish and algae farming in China. Spatiotemporal evolution, driving factors, and decoupling status of shellfish and algae farming from 2003 to 2020 were comprehensively analyzed. Results showed that approximately 6.0 Mt CO2-eq yr  1 were sequestrated in China from 2003 to 2020 via shellfish and algae farming. Shellfish farming could reduce carbon emissions by 31.7 Mt CO2-eq yr  1 by providing 0.39 Mt yr  1 of highly-quality protein when compared to beef production. Moreover, algae farming could reduce the carbon emissions of 0.7 Mt CO2-eq yr  1 by providing 1.6 Mt yr  1 edible food (vegetable) when compared to beet production. The increasing marine fishery economy and farming capacity are the main driving factors for the continuously improving CO2 sequestration capacity of shellfish and algae during 2003-2020. These two driving factors increased carbon sink by 10.35 Mt CO2-eq from 2003 to 2020 accordingly. However, farming area efficiency had a mainly negative effect on the carbon sink with a total 6.94 Mt CO2-eq reduction. In general, China's shellfish and algae farming values account for only a small proportion of the marine fishery value, requiring robust incentive strategies, such as government subsidies and blue carbon trading, to improve carbon sink capacity in China.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The co-benefits for food carbon footprint and overweight and obesity from dietary adjustments in China
    Wang, Lan
    Cui, Shenghui
    Hu, Yuanchao
    Connor, O'Patrick
    Gao, Bing
    Huang, Wei
    Zhang, Ying
    Xu, Su
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 289
  • [2] Public willingness to pay for carbon farming and its co-benefits
    Kragt, M. E.
    Gibson, F. L.
    Maseyk, F.
    Wilson, K. A.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 126 : 125 - 131
  • [3] Air quality co-benefits of carbon pricing in China
    Mingwei Li
    Da Zhang
    Chiao-Ting Li
    Kathleen M. Mulvaney
    Noelle E. Selin
    Valerie J. Karplus
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2018, 8 : 398 - 403
  • [4] Air quality co-benefits of carbon pricing in China
    Li, Mingwei
    Zhang, Da
    Li, Chiao-Ting
    Mulvaney, Kathleen M.
    Selin, Noelle E.
    Karplus, Valerie J.
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2018, 8 (05) : 398 - +
  • [5] Charcoal addition to soils in NE England: A carbon sink with environmental co-benefits?
    Bell, M. J.
    Worrall, F.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 409 (09) : 1704 - 1714
  • [6] Beyond cost and carbon: The multidimensional co-benefits of low carbon transitions in Europe
    Sovacool, Benjamin K.
    Martiskainen, Mari
    Hook, Andrew
    Baker, Lucy
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 169
  • [7] Low carbon scenarios for transport in India: Co-benefits analysis
    Dhar, Subash
    Shukla, Priyadarshi R.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 81 : 186 - 198
  • [8] Co-benefits of low carbon policies in the built environment: An investigation into the adoption of co-benefits by Australian local government
    Karim, S. M.
    Thompson, S.
    Williams, P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL HIGH-PERFORMANCE BUILT ENVIRONMENT CONFERENCE - A SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT CONFERENCE 2016 SERIES (SBE16), IHBE 2016, 2017, 180 : 890 - 900
  • [9] Urban energy, carbon management (low carbon cities) and co-benefits for human health
    Milner, James
    Davies, Michael
    Wilkinson, Paul
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2012, 4 (04) : 398 - 404
  • [10] Detecting and Understanding Synergies and Co-Benefits of Low Carbon Development in the Electric Power Industry in China
    Jiang, Ping
    Alimujiang, Adila
    Dong, Hongjia
    Yan, Xiaoyu
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (01)