Prognosis of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Mixed, Cardiogenic and Septic Shock

被引:2
|
作者
Kim, Ah-Ram [1 ]
Hyun, Junho [1 ]
Lee, Sang Eun [1 ]
Hong, Jung Ae [2 ]
Kang, Pil-Je [2 ]
Jung, Sung-Ho [2 ]
Kim, Min-Seok [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Div Cardiol,Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Asan Med Ctr Heart Inst, Heart Failure & Cardiac Transplantat Ctr, 88 Olymp Ro 43-gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
关键词
cardiogenic shock; septic shock; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; coronary care units; critical care; LACTATE CLEARANCE; RISK-FACTORS; SEPSIS; MORTALITY; ECMO;
D O I
10.1097/MAT.0000000000001933
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Mixed cardiogenic-septic shock (MS), defined as the combination of cardiogenic (CS) and septic (SS) shock, is often encountered in cardiac intensive care units. Herein, the authors compared the impact of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in MS, CS, and SS. Of 1,023 patients who received VA-ECMO from January 2012 to February 2020 at a single center, 211 with pulmonary embolism, hypovolemic shock, aortic dissection, and unknown causes of shock were excluded. The remaining 812 patients were grouped based on the cause of shock at VA-ECMO application: i) MS (n = 246, 30.3%), ii) CS (n = 466, 57.4%), iii) SS (n = 100, 12.3%). The MS group was younger and had lower left ventricular ejection fraction than the CS or SS group did. The 30 day and 1 year mortalities were the highest in SS (30 day mortality: 50.4% vs. 43.3% vs. 69.0%, p < 0.001 for MS versus CS versus SS, respectively; 1 year mortality: 67.5% vs. 53.2% vs. 81.0%, p < 0.001 for MS versus CS versus SS, respectively). Posthoc analysis showed that the 30 day mortality of MS was not different from CS, while the 1 year mortality of MS was worse than CS but better than SS. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation application for MS may help improve survival and should therefore be considered if indicated.
引用
收藏
页码:658 / 664
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Early Electroencephalography Findings in Cardiogenic Shock Patients Treated by Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
    Sinnah, Fabrice
    Dalloz, Marie-Amelie
    Magalhaes, Eric
    Wanono, Ruben
    Neuville, Mathilde
    Smonig, Roland
    Radjou, Aguila
    Mourvillier, Bruno
    Bouadma, Lila
    Timsit, Jean-Francois
    d'Ortho, Marie-Pia
    Rouvel-Tallec, Any
    Sonneville, Romain
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (05) : E389 - E394
  • [42] Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock: The impact of cannulation strategy on survival
    Alhijab, Fatimah A.
    Tantawy, Tarek M.
    Ismail, Huda H.
    AlBarrak, Mohammed
    Adam, Adam, I
    Belghith, Makhlouf
    Hassan, Essam
    Pragliola, Claudio
    Albabtain, Monirah A.
    Arafat, Amr A.
    PERFUSION-UK, 2023, 38 (07): : 1444 - 1452
  • [43] Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Polypharmacy-Induced Cardiogenic Shock and Respiratory Failure
    Chung, Jane
    Bateson, Brian
    Patel, Vijay
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2018, 84 (11) : E483 - E484
  • [44] Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock: indications, mode of operation, and current evidence
    de Chambrun, Marc Pineton
    Brechot, Nicolas
    Combes, Alain
    CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2019, 25 (04) : 397 - 402
  • [45] Cost-utility of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest
    Jaamaa-Holmberg, Salla
    Salmela, Birgitta
    Suojaranta, Raili
    Lemstrom, Karl B.
    Lommi, Jyri
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE, 2020, 9 (04) : 333 - 341
  • [46] Survival on Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Cardiogenic Shock: Which Lactate Is Most Useful?
    Omar, Hesham R.
    Handshoe, Jonathan W.
    Tribble, Thomas
    Guglin, Maya
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2022, 68 (01) : 41 - 45
  • [47] Evaluation of factors affecting prognosis in venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation prognostic factors
    Cetingoz, Esin
    Girgin, Senem
    Cosar, Mehmet Ali
    Golboyu, Birzat Emre
    Tellioglu, Tahsin Murat
    Eygi, Bortecin
    Aksun, Murat
    Gurbuz, Ali
    Karahan, Nagihan
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND ANALYTICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 14 : 319 - 324
  • [48] Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Versus Conventional Therapy in Severe Pediatric Septic Shock
    Oberender, Felix
    Ganeshalingham, Anusha
    Fortenberry, James D.
    Hobson, Michael J.
    Houmes, Robert J.
    Morris, Kevin P.
    Numa, Andrew
    Hoq, Mohammad M.
    Donath, Susan
    Beca, John
    Butt, Warwick
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (10) : 965 - 972
  • [49] Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Septic Shock
    Falk, Lars
    Hultman, Jan
    Broman, Lars Mikael
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (08) : 1097 - 1105
  • [50] Initial Experience of Transaortic Catheter Venting in Patients with Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Cardiogenic Shock
    Hong, Tae Hee
    Byun, Joung Hun
    Lee, Hee Moon
    Kim, Yong Hwan
    Kang, Gu-Hyun
    Oh, Ju Hyeon
    Hwang, Sang Won
    Kim, Han Yong
    Park, Jae Hong
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2016, 62 (02) : 117 - 122